Department of Health Sciences University of Leicester and University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, LE1 5WW, UK.
Life Expert Centre, Schipvaartstraat 4, Leuven, Belgium.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Apr;40(4):569-581. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.01.017. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
The availability of non-invasive diagnostic tests is an important factor in the renewed interest in adenomyosis, as the disease can now be more accurately mapped in the uterus without a need for hysterectomy. An agreed system for classifying and reporting the condition will enhance our understanding of the disease and is envisaged to enable comparison of research studies and treatment outcomes. In this review, we assess previous and more recent attempts at producing a taxonomy, especially in view of the latest proposal for subdivision of adenomyosis into an internal and an external variant. In this context, we also explore the uncertainties linked to classifying involvement of the uterovesical pouch, the pouch of Douglas and lesions in the outer myometrium. Two opposing hypotheses are forwarded to explain the pathogenesis of these variants, namely that disease localized in these areas originates from an invasion by uterine adenomyosis of peritoneal organs; alternatively, that lesions present in the outer myometrium originate from peritoneal endometriosis. At the root of debates around these opposing theories of pathogenesis is fragmentary evidence. Because of the limitations of currently available evidence, and until this issue is resolved, broad agreement on a hypothesis to underpin any proposed classification is unlikely.
非侵入性诊断测试的可用性是人们对子宫腺肌病重新产生兴趣的一个重要因素,因为现在无需进行子宫切除术就可以更准确地在子宫内对该病进行定位。一个商定的分类和报告疾病的系统将增强我们对该疾病的理解,并有望实现研究和治疗结果的比较。在这篇综述中,我们评估了之前和最近在制作分类法方面的尝试,特别是鉴于最近提出的将子宫腺肌病细分为内部和外部变异的建议。在这方面,我们还探讨了与分类子宫膀胱窝、Douglas 窝和外肌层病变的参与相关的不确定性。提出了两种对立的假说来解释这些变异的发病机制,即这些部位的疾病起源于子宫腺肌病对腹膜器官的侵袭;或者,外肌层的病变起源于腹膜内异症。这些对立的发病机制理论的争论根源在于证据不完整。由于目前可用证据的局限性,并且在解决这个问题之前,不太可能就任何拟议分类的基础假说达成广泛共识。