• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Social Impact of Psychological Research on Well-Being Shared in Social Media.社交媒体中分享的心理学研究对幸福感的社会影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 26;11:135. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00135. eCollection 2020.
2
Social impact in social media: A new method to evaluate the social impact of research.社交媒体中的社会影响力:一种评估研究社会影响力的新方法。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 29;13(8):e0203117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203117. eCollection 2018.
3
Communicative Methodology: Contributions to Social Impact Assessment in Psychological Research.交际方法:对心理学研究中社会影响评估的贡献。
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 3;11:286. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00286. eCollection 2020.
4
[A proposal for reforming psychologists' training in France and in the European Union].[关于法国及欧盟心理学家培训改革的一项提议]
Encephale. 2009 Feb;35(1):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.11.008. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
5
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
6
Knowledge Exchange and Discovery in the Age of Social Media: The Journey From Inception to Establishment of a Parent-Led Web-Based Research Advisory Community for Childhood Disability.社交媒体时代的知识交流与发现:从创立到建立一个由家长主导的基于网络的儿童残疾研究咨询社区的历程。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Nov 11;18(11):e293. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5994.
7
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
8
Health science communication strategies used by researchers with the public in the digital and social media ecosystem: a systematic scoping review protocol.研究人员在数字和社交媒体生态系统中与公众使用的健康科学传播策略:一项系统综述方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 30;8(1):e019833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019833.
9
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
10
Scaling Up Research on Drug Abuse and Addiction Through Social Media Big Data.通过社交媒体大数据扩大药物滥用和成瘾研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 31;19(10):e353. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6426.

引用本文的文献

1
Create Solidarity Networks: Dialogs in Reddit to Overcome Depression and Suicidal Ideation among Males.创建团结网络:Reddit 上的对话,以帮助男性克服抑郁和自杀意念。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 13;18(22):11927. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211927.
2
Social Media for Knowledge Acquisition and Dissemination: The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Collaborative Learning Driven Social Media Adoption.用于知识获取与传播的社交媒体:新冠疫情对协作学习驱动的社交媒体采用的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 May 31;12:648253. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648253. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
To Mix or Not To Mix? A Meta-Method Approach to Rethinking Evaluation Practices for Improved Effectiveness and Efficiency of Psychological Therapies Illustrated With the Application of Perceptual Control Theory.混合还是不混合?一种元方法,用于重新思考评估实践,以提高心理治疗的有效性和效率,并以感知控制理论的应用为例进行说明。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 26;10:1445. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01445. eCollection 2019.
2
Evaluation of a policy intervention to promote the health and wellbeing of workers in small and medium sized enterprises - a cluster randomised controlled trial.评价一项政策干预措施,以促进中小企业员工的健康和福利 - 一项群组随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 2;19(1):493. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6582-y.
3
Return to work and associations with psychosocial well-being and health-related quality of life in coronary heart disease patients: Results from EUROASPIRE IV.重返工作与冠心病患者的心理健康和健康相关生活质量的关系:来自 EUROASPIRE IV 的研究结果。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019 Sep;26(13):1386-1395. doi: 10.1177/2047487319843079. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
4
The role of optimism, self-esteem, and self-efficacy in moderating the relation between health comparisons and subjective well-being: Results of a nationally representative longitudinal study among older adults.乐观、自尊和自我效能在调节健康比较与主观幸福感之间的关系中的作用:一项针对老年人的全国性纵向研究的结果。
Br J Health Psychol. 2019 Sep;24(3):547-570. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12367. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
5
Christians and Buddhists Are Comparably Happy on Twitter: A Large-Scale Linguistic Analysis of Religious Differences in Social, Cognitive, and Emotional Tendencies.基督教徒和佛教徒在推特上同样快乐:对社交、认知和情感倾向中宗教差异的大规模语言分析
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 6;10:113. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00113. eCollection 2019.
6
Does engagement in productive activities affect mental health and well-being in older adults with a chronic physical disability? Observational evidence from a Swiss cohort study.从事生产性活动是否会影响患有慢性身体残疾的老年人的心理健康和幸福感?来自瑞士队列研究的观察证据。
Aging Ment Health. 2020 May;24(5):732-739. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1576158. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
7
Using Eye Tracking to Explore Facebook Use and Associations with Facebook Addiction, Mental Well-being, and Personality.利用眼动追踪技术探索Facebook的使用情况以及与Facebook成瘾、心理健康和人格的关联。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2019 Feb 18;9(2):19. doi: 10.3390/bs9020019.
8
Protecting the Value of Medical Science in the Age of Social Media and "Fake News".在社交媒体和“假新闻”时代保护医学科学的价值
JAMA. 2018 Dec 18;320(23):2415-2416. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.18416.
9
Using Facebook for Improving the Psychological Well-Being of Individuals Experiencing Homelessness: Experimental and Longitudinal Study.利用脸书改善无家可归者的心理健康:实验性与纵向研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2018 Oct 10;5(4):e59. doi: 10.2196/mental.9814.
10
Social impact in social media: A new method to evaluate the social impact of research.社交媒体中的社会影响力:一种评估研究社会影响力的新方法。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 29;13(8):e0203117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203117. eCollection 2018.

社交媒体中分享的心理学研究对幸福感的社会影响。

Social Impact of Psychological Research on Well-Being Shared in Social Media.

作者信息

Pulido Cristina M, Mara Liviu-Catalin, Ionescu Vladia, Sordé-Martí Teresa

机构信息

Department of Journalism and Communication Sciences, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Business Management, University of Rovira and Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 26;11:135. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00135. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00135
PMID:32174862
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7054436/
Abstract

The purpose of this article is to demonstrate how the Social Impact in Social Media (SISM, hereinafter) methodology applied in psychological research provides evidence for the visibility of the social impact of the research. This article helps researchers become aware of whether and how their improvements are capturing the interest of citizens and how citizens are applying such evidence and obtaining better outcomes, in this case, in relation to well-being. In addition, citizens can access the latest evidence on social media and act as channels of communication between science and social or personal networks and, in doing so, they can improve the living conditions of others. This methodology is also useful for agencies that support researchers in psychology with financial assistance, which can use it to evaluate the social impact of the funds that they invest in research. In this article, the 10 studies on well-being were selected for analysis using the following criteria: their research results led to demonstrable improvement in well-being, and these improvements are presented on social media. We applied the social impact coverage ratio to identify the percentage of the social impact shared in social media in relation to the total amount of social media data collected. Finally, examples of quantitative and qualitative evidence of the social impact of the research on well-being are presented.

摘要

本文的目的是展示在心理学研究中应用的社交媒体中的社会影响(以下简称SISM)方法如何为研究的社会影响的可见性提供证据。本文帮助研究人员了解他们的研究成果是否以及如何引起公民的兴趣,以及公民如何应用这些证据并获得更好的结果,在这种情况下,是关于幸福感的结果。此外,公民可以获取社交媒体上的最新证据,并充当科学与社会或个人网络之间的沟通渠道,通过这样做,他们可以改善他人的生活条件。这种方法对那些为心理学研究人员提供资金支持的机构也很有用,这些机构可以用它来评估他们投资于研究的资金的社会影响。在本文中,根据以下标准选择了10项关于幸福感的研究进行分析:它们的研究结果导致幸福感有可证明的改善,并且这些改善在社交媒体上有所呈现。我们应用社会影响覆盖率来确定在社交媒体上分享的社会影响占所收集的社交媒体数据总量的百分比。最后,展示了关于幸福感研究的社会影响的定量和定性证据的示例。