Suppr超能文献

研究人员在数字和社交媒体生态系统中与公众使用的健康科学传播策略:一项系统综述方案

Health science communication strategies used by researchers with the public in the digital and social media ecosystem: a systematic scoping review protocol.

作者信息

Fontaine Guillaume, Lavallée Andréane, Maheu-Cadotte Marc-André, Bouix-Picasso Julien, Bourbonnais Anne

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

Research Center, Montreal Heart Institute, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 30;8(1):e019833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019833.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The optimisation of health science communication (HSC) between researchers and the public is crucial. In the last decade, the rise of the digital and social media ecosystem allowed for the disintermediation of HSC. Disintermediation refers to the public's direct access to information from researchers about health science-related topics through the digital and social media ecosystem, a process that would otherwise require a human mediator, such as a journalist. Therefore, the primary aim of this scoping review is to describe the nature and the extent of the literature regarding HSC strategies involving disintermediation used by researchers with the public in the digital and social media ecosystem. The secondary aim is to describe the HSC strategies used by researchers, and the communication channels associated with these strategies.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a scoping review based on the Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology and perform a systematic search of six bibliographical databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, IBSS, PubMed, Sociological Abstracts and Web of Science), four trial registries and relevant sources of grey literature. Relevant journals and reference lists of included records will be hand-searched. Data will be managed using the EndNote software and the Rayyan web application. Two review team members will perform independently the screening process as well as the full-text assessment of included records. Descriptive data will be synthesised in a tabular format. Data regarding the nature and the extent of the literature, the HSC strategies and the associated communication channels will be presented narratively.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This review does not require institutional review board approval as we will use only collected and published data. Results will allow the mapping of the literature about HSC between researchers and the public in the digital and social media ecosystem, and will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

摘要

引言

优化研究人员与公众之间的健康科学传播(HSC)至关重要。在过去十年中,数字和社交媒体生态系统的兴起使得健康科学传播得以去中介化。去中介化是指公众通过数字和社交媒体生态系统直接从研究人员那里获取有关健康科学相关主题的信息,而这一过程在其他情况下需要诸如记者这样的人力中介。因此,本范围综述的主要目的是描述有关研究人员在数字和社交媒体生态系统中与公众使用涉及去中介化的健康科学传播策略的文献的性质和范围。次要目的是描述研究人员使用的健康科学传播策略以及与这些策略相关的传播渠道。

方法与分析

我们将根据乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的方法进行范围综述,并对六个书目数据库(CINAHL、EMBASE、IBSS、PubMed、社会学摘要和科学引文索引)、四个试验注册库和相关灰色文献来源进行系统检索。将手工检索相关期刊和纳入记录的参考文献列表。数据将使用EndNote软件和Rayyan网络应用程序进行管理。两名综述团队成员将独立进行筛选过程以及对纳入记录的全文评估。描述性数据将以表格形式进行综合。有关文献的性质和范围、健康科学传播策略以及相关传播渠道的数据将以叙述方式呈现。

伦理与传播

由于我们仅使用已收集和已发表的数据,本综述无需机构审查委员会批准。研究结果将有助于绘制数字和社交媒体生态系统中研究人员与公众之间关于健康科学传播的文献图谱,并将发表在同行评审期刊上。

相似文献

7
Creating dementia-friendly and inclusive communities for social inclusion: a scoping review protocol.
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 17;10(6):e035028. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035028.
8
Co-design of Digital Health Interventions for Young Adults: Protocol for a Scoping Review.
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Oct 24;11(10):e38635. doi: 10.2196/38635.
9
Mapping the digital food environment: a scoping review protocol.
BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 22;10(4):e036241. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036241.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Communicating Health Research With Plain Language.
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251357755. doi: 10.1177/00469580251357755. Epub 2025 Sep 8.
2
Strategies for communicating scientific evidence on healthcare to managers and the population: a scoping review.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jul 10;21(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01017-2.
3
Investigating mediated public engagement with science on the "science" subreddit: From the participants' perspective.
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 28;16(4):e0249181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249181. eCollection 2021.
4
Risk Perception of Air Pollution: A Systematic Review Focused on Particulate Matter Exposure.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 3;17(17):6424. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176424.
6
An emerging form of public engagement with science: Ask Me Anything (AMA) sessions on Reddit r/science.
PLoS One. 2019 May 15;14(5):e0216789. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216789. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
2
Using Twitter™ to drive research impact: A discussion of strategies, opportunities and challenges.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Jul;59:15-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
3
Translating Research for Health Policy Decisions: Is It Time for Researchers to Join Social Media?
Acad Med. 2016 Oct;91(10):1341-1343. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001182.
4
Science communication on YouTube: Factors that affect channel and video popularity.
Public Underst Sci. 2016 Aug;25(6):706-18. doi: 10.1177/0963662515572068. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
5
Ebola and the social media.
Lancet. 2014 Dec 20;384(9961):2207. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62418-1. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
7
What conceptions of science communication are espoused by science research funding bodies?
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jul;23(5):511-27. doi: 10.1177/0963662512455295.
8
Why should we promote public engagement with science?
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):4-15. doi: 10.1177/0963662513518154.
10
Scoping studies: advancing the methodology.
Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验