• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院预防静脉用药错误的系统防御措施:系统评价。

Systemic Defenses to Prevent Intravenous Medication Errors in Hospitals: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacy Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki; Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e1669-e1680. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000688.

DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000000688
PMID:32175962
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8612901/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Intravenous medication delivery is a complex process that poses systemic risks of errors. The objective of our study was to identify systemic defenses that can prevent in-hospital intravenous (IV) medication errors.

METHODS

A systematic review adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, CINAHL, and EMB reviews for articles published between January 2005 and June 2016. Peer-reviewed journal articles published in English were included. Two reviewers independently selected articles according to a predetermined PICO tool. The quality of studies was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system, and the evidence was analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-six studies from 11 countries were included in the analysis. We identified systemic defenses related to administration (n = 24 studies), prescribing (n = 8), preparation (n = 6), treatment monitoring (n = 2), and dispensing (n = 1). In addition, 5 studies explored defenses related to multiple stages of the drug delivery process. Systemic defenses including features of closed-loop medication management systems appeared in 61% of the studies, with smart pumps being the defense most widely studied (24%). The evidence quality of the included articles was limited, as 83% were graded as low quality, 13% were of moderate quality, and only 4% were of high quality.

CONCLUSIONS

In-hospital IV medication processes are developing toward closed-loop medication management systems. Our study provides health care organizations with preliminary knowledge about systemic defenses that can prevent IV medication errors, but more rigorous evidence is needed. There is a need for further studies to explore combinations of different systemic defenses and their effectiveness in error prevention throughout the drug delivery process.

摘要

目的

静脉给药是一个复杂的过程,会带来全身性的用药错误风险。本研究旨在确定能预防院内静脉(IV)用药错误的系统性防护措施。

方法

我们遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行了系统综述。我们检索了 MEDLINE(Ovid)、Scopus、CINAHL 和 EMB 评论,以获取 2005 年 1 月至 2016 年 6 月发表的文章。纳入了发表在英语期刊上的同行评议文章。两名评审员根据预定的 PICO 工具独立选择文章。使用推荐评估、制定和评估系统对研究质量进行评估,并使用定性内容分析对证据进行分析。

结果

11 个国家的 46 项研究被纳入分析。我们确定了与给药(n = 24 项研究)、处方(n = 8 项)、准备(n = 6 项)、治疗监测(n = 2 项)和分发(n = 1 项)相关的系统性防护措施。此外,有 5 项研究探讨了与药物输送过程多个阶段相关的防护措施。包括闭环药物管理系统特征的系统性防护措施出现在 61%的研究中,其中智能泵是研究最广泛的防护措施(24%)。纳入文章的证据质量有限,83%被评为低质量,13%为中质量,只有 4%为高质量。

结论

院内 IV 给药过程正朝着闭环药物管理系统的方向发展。本研究为医疗机构提供了有关能预防 IV 用药错误的系统性防护措施的初步知识,但需要更严格的证据。需要进一步研究来探索不同系统性防护措施的组合及其在整个药物输送过程中预防错误的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e0f/8612901/cc79806e9729/pts-17-e1669-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e0f/8612901/86229e847ec3/pts-17-e1669-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e0f/8612901/cc79806e9729/pts-17-e1669-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e0f/8612901/86229e847ec3/pts-17-e1669-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e0f/8612901/cc79806e9729/pts-17-e1669-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Systemic Defenses to Prevent Intravenous Medication Errors in Hospitals: A Systematic Review.医院预防静脉用药错误的系统防御措施:系统评价。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e1669-e1680. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000688.
2
Systemic Causes of In-Hospital Intravenous Medication Errors: A Systematic Review.医院内静脉用药错误的系统原因:系统评价。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e1660-e1668. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000632.
3
Evolution of Intravenous Medication Errors and Preventive Systemic Defenses in Hospital Settings-A Narrative Review of Recent Evidence.静脉用药错误的演变和医院环境中的预防系统性防御措施:近期证据的叙述性综述。
J Patient Saf. 2024 Jun 1;20(4):e29-e39. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001222. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Safety, time and cost evaluation of automated and semi-automated drug distribution systems in hospitals: a systematic review.医院自动化和半自动化药品分发系统的安全性、时间和成本评估:系统评价。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2020 Sep;27(5):253-262. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-001791. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
7
Interventions to ensure medication safety in acute care: an umbrella review.干预措施以确保急性护理中的药物安全:伞式综述。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2020 Jun;18(2):188-211. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000232.
8
Causes of medication administration errors in hospitals: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.医院给药错误的原因:定量和定性证据的系统评价。
Drug Saf. 2013 Nov;36(11):1045-67. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0090-2.
9
Automated unit dose dispensing systems producing individually packaged and labelled drugs for inpatients: a systematic review.为住院患者生产单剂量独立包装和贴标签药品的自动单剂量配药系统:一项系统评价
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2023 May;30(3):127-135. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2021-003002. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
10
Incidence and prevalence of intravenous medication errors in the UK: a systematic review.英国静脉药物错误的发生率和流行率:系统评价。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2020 Jan;27(1):3-8. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-001624. Epub 2018 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Bridging generations: The central role of career-stage mentorship in social and administrative pharmacy.跨越代际:职业阶段指导在社会与行政药学中的核心作用
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 Sep 10;16:100506. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100506. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Investigating pediatric nurses' perceptions of factors contributing to MAEs at Yendi hospital, Ghana.调查加纳延迪医院儿科护士对导致医疗不良事件的因素的看法。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Dec 3;24(1):792. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-05269-x.
3
Frontline nursing staff's perceptions of intravenous medication administration: the first step toward safer infusion processes-a qualitative study.
一线护理人员对静脉药物给药的看法:迈向更安全输液流程的第一步——一项定性研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jun 27;13(2):e002809. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002809.
4
Use of Computerized Physician Order Entry with Clinical Decision Support to Prevent Dose Errors in Pediatric Medication Orders: A Systematic Review.使用计算机化医师医嘱录入和临床决策支持系统预防儿科药物医嘱剂量错误:系统评价。
Paediatr Drugs. 2024 Mar;26(2):127-143. doi: 10.1007/s40272-023-00614-6. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
5
Medication errors related to high-alert medications in a paediatric university hospital - a cross-sectional study analysing error reporting system data.儿科大学医院高警示药物相关用药错误-横断面研究分析差错报告系统数据。
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Oct 31;23(1):548. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04333-2.
6
A qualitative analysis of intravenous smart pump usability.静脉智能输液泵可用性的定性分析。
Nurs Open. 2022 Jul;9(4):2171-2178. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1227. Epub 2022 May 19.
7
Dose error reduction software in medication safety risk management - optimising the smart infusion pump dosing limits in neonatal intensive care unit prior to implementation.剂量错误减少软件在药物安全风险管理中的应用-在实施前优化新生儿重症监护病房智能输液泵的给药限制。
BMC Pediatr. 2022 Mar 8;22(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03183-8.
8
Prevalence and determinants of medication administration errors in clinical wards: A two-centre prospective observational study.临床病房药物管理错误的发生率及决定因素:一项两中心前瞻性观察研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jan;32(1-2):208-220. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16215. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
9
Effect of automated unit dose dispensing with barcode scanning on medication administration errors: an uncontrolled before-and-after study.条形码扫描自动化单元剂量配发对给药错误的影响:一项非对照前后研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Nov 13;33(4). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab142.
10
Prevalence and determinants of intravenous admixture preparation errors: A prospective observational study in a university hospital.静脉药物混合配置差错的发生率及其决定因素:某大学医院的前瞻性观察研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2022 Feb;44(1):44-52. doi: 10.1007/s11096-021-01310-6. Epub 2021 Aug 7.