• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一线护理人员对静脉药物给药的看法:迈向更安全输液流程的第一步——一项定性研究。

Frontline nursing staff's perceptions of intravenous medication administration: the first step toward safer infusion processes-a qualitative study.

机构信息

Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Japan

Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Shinjuku-ku, Japan.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jun 27;13(2):e002809. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002809.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002809
PMID:38942437
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11216072/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Intravenous medication errors continue to significantly impact patient safety and outcomes. This study sought to clarify the complexity and risks of the intravenous administration process.

DESIGN

A qualitative focus group interview study.

SETTING

Focused interviews were conducted using process mapping with frontline nurses responsible for medication administration in September 2020.

PARTICIPANTS

Front line experiened nurses from a Japanese tertiary teaching hospital.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was to identify the mental models frontline nurses used during intravenous medication administration, which influence their interactions with patients, and secondarily, to examine the medication process gaps between the mental models nurses perceive and the actual defined medication administration process.

RESULTS

We found gaps between the perceived clinical administration process and the real process challenges with an emphasis on the importance of verifying to see if the drug was ordered for the patient immediately before its administration.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel and applied improvement approach can help nurses and managers better understand the process vulnerability of the infusion process and develop a deeper understanding of the administration steps useful for reliably improving the safety of intravenous medications.

摘要

目的

静脉用药错误继续对患者安全和结果产生重大影响。本研究旨在阐明静脉给药过程的复杂性和风险。

设计

定性焦点小组访谈研究。

地点

2020 年 9 月,对负责药物管理的一线护士进行了基于流程映射的焦点小组访谈。

参与者

来自日本一家三级教学医院的一线有经验护士。

主要和次要结果测量

主要结果测量是确定一线护士在静脉用药管理过程中使用的心智模型,这些模型影响他们与患者的互动;其次,检查护士感知的药物治疗过程差距与实际定义的药物管理过程之间的差距。

结果

我们发现感知到的临床管理过程与实际过程之间存在差距,重点强调了在给药前立即核实药物是否为患者开具的重要性。

结论

这种新颖且实用的改进方法可以帮助护士和管理人员更好地了解输液过程的流程脆弱性,并深入了解给药步骤,有助于可靠地提高静脉用药的安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03f3/11216072/e4dd702f6440/bmjoq-2024-002809f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03f3/11216072/e4dd702f6440/bmjoq-2024-002809f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03f3/11216072/e4dd702f6440/bmjoq-2024-002809f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Frontline nursing staff's perceptions of intravenous medication administration: the first step toward safer infusion processes-a qualitative study.一线护理人员对静脉药物给药的看法:迈向更安全输液流程的第一步——一项定性研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jun 27;13(2):e002809. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002809.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Consequences, costs and cost-effectiveness of workforce configurations in English acute hospitals.英国急症医院劳动力配置的后果、成本及成本效益
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(25):1-107. doi: 10.3310/ZBAR9152.
4
Results of a qualitative semi-structured interview study with hospital nursing staff to improve incident reporting systems in Estonia.一项针对爱沙尼亚医院护理人员的定性半结构化访谈研究结果,旨在改进事件报告系统。
J Healthc Qual Res. 2025 Jan-Feb;40(1):39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.10.003. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
5
Technology-enabled CONTACT tracing in care homes in the COVID-19 pandemic: the CONTACT non-randomised mixed-methods feasibility study.新冠疫情期间养老院中基于技术的接触者追踪:CONTACT非随机混合方法可行性研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(24):1-24. doi: 10.3310/UHDN6497.
6
Assessing employee silence about patient safety and its association with environmental factors among nurses in Ardabil: a cross-sectional study.评估阿尔达比勒护士对患者安全问题保持沉默的情况及其与环境因素的关联:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 18;25(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12426-0.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
The Experiences of Critical Care Nurses Implementing Point-Of-Care Ultrasound: A Qualitative Study.重症护理护士实施床旁超声检查的经验:一项定性研究。
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 Jul;30(4):e70104. doi: 10.1111/nicc.70104.
9
Comparison of routes for achieving parenteral access with a focus on the management of patients with Ebola virus disease.实现肠外通路的途径比较,重点关注埃博拉病毒病患者的管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 26;2015(2):CD011386. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011386.pub2.
10
Unveiling the Impact of Operational Failures on Patients: A SEIPS-based Analysis From the Perspective of Hospital Nurses.揭示操作失误对患者的影响:基于医院护士视角的SEIPS分析
J Patient Saf. 2025 Aug 1;21(5):339-347. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001341. Epub 2025 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges in Pediatric Fluid Management: Insights into Nursing Practices and Knowledge.儿科液体管理中的挑战:对护理实践与知识的洞察
Sage Open Pediatr. 2025 Sep 1;12:30502225251364933. doi: 10.1177/30502225251364933. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Public Health Workforce Professional Development Analysis: A Human-Systems Integration for Healthy Communities.公共卫生劳动力专业发展分析:健康社区的人类系统整合
Int J Public Health. 2025 Feb 27;70:1608006. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2025.1608006. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
The Safety of Inpatient Health Care.住院患者医疗安全。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Jan 12;388(2):142-153. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2206117.
2
Intravenous Smart Pumps at the Point of Care: A Descriptive, Observational Study.静脉智能输液泵在床边护理中的应用:一项描述性、观察性研究。
J Patient Saf. 2022 Sep 1;18(6):553-558. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001057. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
3
Process mapping in healthcare: a systematic review.医疗保健中的流程映射:一项系统综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 14;21(1):342. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06254-1.
4
Systemic Defenses to Prevent Intravenous Medication Errors in Hospitals: A Systematic Review.医院预防静脉用药错误的系统防御措施:系统评价。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e1669-e1680. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000688.
5
Smart pumps improve medication safety but increase alert burden in neonatal care.智能输液泵可提高药物安全性,但会增加新生儿护理中的报警负担。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Nov 7;19(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0945-2.
6
Best Practices to Decrease Infusion-Associated Medication Errors.减少输液相关用药错误的最佳实践。
J Infus Nurs. 2019 Jul/Aug;42(4):183-192. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000329.
7
Anaphylaxis-related Malpractice Lawsuits.过敏反应相关医疗事故诉讼
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Jul;19(4):693-700. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.4.37453. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
8
Nurses' Attitudes Toward the Single Checking of Medications.护士对药品单人核对的态度。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2017 Aug;14(4):274-281. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12201. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
9
Our current approach to root cause analysis: is it contributing to our failure to improve patient safety?我们当前的根本原因分析方法:它是否导致了我们在改善患者安全方面的失败?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 May;26(5):381-387. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005991. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
10
The frequency of intravenous medication administration errors related to smart infusion pumps: a multihospital observational study.与智能输液泵相关的静脉用药给药错误发生率:一项多医院观察性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Feb;26(2):131-140. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004465. Epub 2016 Feb 23.