Campbell L D
J Prosthet Dent. 1977 May;37(5):507-16. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(77)90163-9.
Simlated partial denture frameworks were fabricated for 12 dentists (subjects) who had intact dentitions and who had intact dentitions and who had had no previous experience in wearing partial dentures. The outline of the major connectors was modified during a 1 week interval. The data obtained from questionnaires brought about the following conclusions: 1. Preferences in maxillary major connector design were as follows: (1) broad posterior strap, (2) anteroposterior bar, (3) ring-type design, and (4) full palatal coverage. 2. The mandibular lingual bar was chosen over the lingual plate by a 3:1 ratio. 3. The natural palatal metal finish was perferred to the highly polished finish. 4. Metal borders parallel to tongue movement were better tolerated than those lying transverse. 5. Thickening of the posterior strap to permit its narrowing was not clinically feasible. 6. In general, patients adapted best to major connectors that covered the least amount of soft tissues.
为12名牙列完整且此前无佩戴局部义齿经验的牙医(受试者)制作了模拟局部义齿支架。在1周的间隔期内修改了大连接体的轮廓。从问卷调查中获得的数据得出了以下结论:1. 对上颌大连接体设计的偏好如下:(1)宽后腭杆,(2)前后杆,(3)环形设计,以及(4)全腭覆盖。2. 下颌舌杆与舌板的选择比例为3:1。3. 天然腭部金属表面处理比高度抛光的表面处理更受青睐。4. 与舌运动平行的金属边缘比横向的金属边缘耐受性更好。5. 加厚后腭杆以使其变窄在临床上不可行。6. 一般来说,患者对覆盖软组织最少的大连接体适应得最好。