Suppr超能文献

两种下颌主要连接体设计的临床比较:舌下杆和舌板。

Clinical comparison of two mandibular major connector designs: the sublingual bar and the lingual plate.

作者信息

Hansen C A, Campbell D J

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 1985 Dec;54(6):805-9. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(85)90475-5.

Abstract

Two mandibular removable partial dentures, one with a sublingual bar and one with a lingual plate as the major connector, were constructed for 10 patients. Both were made using the same impression and were identical except for the design of the major connector. The two major connector designs were evaluated by the patients at the conclusion of the study. Eight of the 10 patients preferred the lingual plate and nine of the 10 found both designs satisfactory. One patient indicated a strong preference for the sublingual bar over the lingual plate and another found both designs equally acceptable. We have concluded from the final data that the sublingual bar compares favorably with the lingual plate in patient acceptance and should be considered as a viable design alternative when a lingual plate is not indicated.

摘要

为10名患者制作了两个下颌可摘局部义齿,一个带有舌下杆,另一个以舌板作为主要连接体。两者均采用相同的印模制作,除主要连接体设计外完全相同。在研究结束时,由患者对这两种主要连接体设计进行评估。10名患者中有8名更喜欢舌板,10名中有9名认为两种设计都令人满意。一名患者表示强烈倾向于舌下杆而非舌板,另一名患者则认为两种设计同样可以接受。根据最终数据我们得出结论,在患者接受度方面,舌下杆与舌板相比具有优势,当不适合使用舌板时,舌下杆应被视为一种可行的设计选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验