• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教师发展在提高牙医学教育多项选择题质量中的作用。

The Role of Faculty Development in Improving the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions in Dental Education.

出版信息

J Dent Educ. 2020 Mar;84(3):316-322. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.189.

DOI:10.21815/JDE.019.189
PMID:32176343
Abstract

Valid and reliable assessment of students' knowledge and skills is integral to dental education. However, most faculty members receive no formal training on student assessment techniques. The aim of this study was to quantify the value of a professional development program designed to improve the test item-writing skills of dental faculty members. A quasi-experimental (pretest, intervention, posttest) study was conducted with faculty members in the dental school of Majmaah University, Saudi Arabia. Data assessed were 450 multiple-choice questions (MCQs) from final exams in 15 courses in 2017 (prior to the intervention; pretest) and the same number in 2018 (after the intervention; posttest). The intervention was a faculty development program implemented in 2018 to improve the writing of MCQs. This training highlighted construct-irrelevant variance-the abnormal increase or decrease in test scores due to factors extraneous to constructs of interest-and provided expert advice to rectify flaws. Item analysis of pre- and post-intervention MCQs determined the difficulty index, discrimination index, and proportion of non-functional distractors for each question. MCQs on 2017 and 2018 exams were compared on each of these parameters. The results showed statistically significant improvements in MCQs from 2017 to 2018 on all parameters. MCQs with low discrimination decreased, those with high discrimination increased, and the proportion of questions with more than two non-functional distractors were reduced. These results provide evidence of improved test item quality following implementation of a long-term faculty development program. Additionally, the findings underscore the need for an active dental education department and demonstrate its value for dental schools.

摘要

对学生的知识和技能进行有效且可靠的评估是牙科教育的重要组成部分。然而,大多数教师并未接受过学生评估技术的正规培训。本研究旨在量化一项旨在提高牙科教师试题编写技能的专业发展计划的价值。本研究采用准实验(前测、干预、后测)设计,在沙特阿拉伯麦加大学牙科学院的教师中进行。评估的数据是 2017 年 15 门课程期末考试中的 450 道多项选择题(MCQ)(干预前;前测)和 2018 年相同数量的 MCQ(干预后;后测)。干预措施是 2018 年实施的一项教师发展计划,旨在提高 MCQ 的编写质量。该培训强调了与结构无关的方差-由于与感兴趣的结构无关的因素导致的考试成绩的异常增加或减少-并提供了纠正缺陷的专家建议。对干预前后的 MCQ 进行项目分析,确定每个问题的难度指数、区分指数和非功能干扰项的比例。比较了 2017 年和 2018 年考试的 MCQ 在这些参数上的差异。结果表明,2017 年至 2018 年,所有参数的 MCQ 均有显著提高。区分度低的 MCQ 减少,区分度高的 MCQ 增加,有两个以上非功能干扰项的问题比例减少。这些结果为实施长期教师发展计划后测试项目质量的提高提供了证据。此外,研究结果强调了积极的牙科教育部门的必要性,并展示了其对牙科学校的价值。

相似文献

1
The Role of Faculty Development in Improving the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions in Dental Education.教师发展在提高牙医学教育多项选择题质量中的作用。
J Dent Educ. 2020 Mar;84(3):316-322. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.189.
2
Will a Short Training Session Improve Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Quality by Dental School Faculty? A Pilot Study.短期培训课程能否提高牙科学院教师编写选择题的质量?一项试点研究。
J Dent Educ. 2017 Aug;81(8):948-955. doi: 10.21815/JDE.017.047.
3
A One-Day Dental Faculty Workshop in Writing Multiple-Choice Questions: An Impact Evaluation.一场关于编写选择题的为期一天的牙科学院研讨会:影响评估。
J Dent Educ. 2015 Nov;79(11):1305-13.
4
Effectiveness of longitudinal faculty development programs on MCQs items writing skills: A follow-up study.纵向教师发展计划对多项选择题编写技能的有效性:一项随访研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 10;12(10):e0185895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185895. eCollection 2017.
5
Impact of a longitudinal faculty development program on the quality of multiple-choice question item writing in medical education.纵向教师发展计划对医学教育中多项选择题编写质量的影响。
Ann Afr Med. 2021 Jan-Mar;20(1):46-51. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_14_20.
6
Knowledge of dental faculty in gulf cooperation council states of multiple-choice questions' item writing flaws.海湾合作委员会国家牙科教师对多选题项目编写缺陷的认识。
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1812224. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1812224.
7
Effect of Faculty Training on Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions.教师培训对多项选择题质量的影响。
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2020 Jul-Sep;10(3):210-214. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_30_20. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
8
Knowledge, application and how about competence? Qualitative assessment of multiple-choice questions for dental students.知识、应用和能力如何?对牙科学生多选题的定性评估。
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1714199. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1714199.
9
Writing Multiple Choice Questions-Has the Student Become the Master?编写多项选择题——学生是否已经成为主人?
Teach Learn Med. 2023 Jun-Jul;35(3):356-367. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2050240. Epub 2022 May 1.
10
Faculty development programs improve the quality of Multiple Choice Questions items' writing.教师发展项目提高了多项选择题写作的质量。
Sci Rep. 2015 Apr 1;5:9556. doi: 10.1038/srep09556.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of Faculty Development Training Workshops (FDTWs) on Writing High-Quality Multiple-Choice Questions at Northern Border University (NBU) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).沙特阿拉伯王国(KSA)北部边境大学(NBU)教师发展培训工作坊(FDTWs)在编写高质量多项选择题方面的成效。
Cureus. 2024 Jun 18;16(6):e62607. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62607. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
The interrelationship between confidence and correctness in a multiple-choice assessment: pointing out misconceptions and assuring valuable questions.多项选择题评估中信心与正确性之间的相互关系:指出误解并确保问题有价值。
BDJ Open. 2021 Feb 12;7(1):10. doi: 10.1038/s41405-021-00067-4.