• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沙特阿拉伯王国(KSA)北部边境大学(NBU)教师发展培训工作坊(FDTWs)在编写高质量多项选择题方面的成效。

Efficacy of Faculty Development Training Workshops (FDTWs) on Writing High-Quality Multiple-Choice Questions at Northern Border University (NBU) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).

作者信息

Agarwal Anshoo, Khattak Osama, Esmaeel Safya Ebraheem, Fahmy Eslam, Bayomy Naglaa Ahmed, Mehmood Syed Imran, Mohamed Hamza, Bawadekji Abdulhakim, Alotibi Fahad Abdullah J, Alanazi Malek Saad M, Younes Abeer

机构信息

Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Northern Border University, Arar, SAU.

Restorative Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakakah, SAU.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Jun 18;16(6):e62607. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62607. eCollection 2024 Jun.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.62607
PMID:39027751
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11257642/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A multiple-choice question (MCQ) is a frequently used assessment tool in medical education for both certification and competitive examinations. Well-constructed MCQs impact the utility of the assessment and, thus, the fate of the examinee.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To analyze the basic science faculty perceptions of writing high-quality MCQs, to create awareness of item-writing flaws in constructing high-quality MCQs, and to determine the impact of faculty development training workshops (FDTWs) on MCQ writing skills.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An online workshop was held over two weeks for basic science faculty to learn high-quality MCQ construction. Faculty-made MCQs were analyzed for flaws, and a questionnaire assessed the impact of the workshop on MCQ construction. Pre- and post-workshop responses were compared to evaluate the necessity of such workshops for improving faculty skills in MCQ assessments.

RESULTS

A total of 47 (83.2%) of participating faculty believed the workshop could reduce MCQ construction errors. The participants agreed that a series of workshops were needed for lasting improvements in MCQ construction.

CONCLUSIONS

One-day short-duration workshops, such as the current one alone, cannot achieve the objectives of training participants to write high-quality MCQs. To improve student assessment through high-quality MCQs, the faculty needs to be exposed to continuous and frequent sessions that will help them.

摘要

背景

多项选择题(MCQ)是医学教育中认证考试和竞争性考试常用的评估工具。精心构建的多项选择题会影响评估的效用,进而影响考生的命运。

目的

分析基础科学教师对撰写高质量多项选择题的看法,提高对构建高质量多项选择题时题目编写缺陷的认识,并确定教师发展培训工作坊(FDTWs)对多项选择题编写技能的影响。

材料与方法

为基础科学教师举办了为期两周的在线工作坊,以学习高质量多项选择题的构建。分析教师编写的多项选择题中的缺陷,并通过问卷调查评估工作坊对多项选择题构建的影响。比较工作坊前后的反馈,以评估此类工作坊对提高教师在多项选择题评估方面技能的必要性。

结果

共有47名(83.2%)参与教师认为该工作坊可以减少多项选择题构建中的错误。参与者一致认为,需要一系列工作坊才能在多项选择题构建方面实现持久改进。

结论

像本次这样为期一天的短期工作坊,仅靠它本身无法实现培训参与者撰写高质量多项选择题的目标。为了通过高质量的多项选择题改进学生评估,教师需要参加持续且频繁的相关课程,这将对他们有所帮助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38db/11257642/adcd8399fce4/cureus-0016-00000062607-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38db/11257642/24e588ada4ed/cureus-0016-00000062607-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38db/11257642/da2186f0bd0a/cureus-0016-00000062607-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38db/11257642/adcd8399fce4/cureus-0016-00000062607-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38db/11257642/24e588ada4ed/cureus-0016-00000062607-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38db/11257642/da2186f0bd0a/cureus-0016-00000062607-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38db/11257642/adcd8399fce4/cureus-0016-00000062607-i03.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of Faculty Development Training Workshops (FDTWs) on Writing High-Quality Multiple-Choice Questions at Northern Border University (NBU) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).沙特阿拉伯王国(KSA)北部边境大学(NBU)教师发展培训工作坊(FDTWs)在编写高质量多项选择题方面的成效。
Cureus. 2024 Jun 18;16(6):e62607. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62607. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Effect of Faculty Training on Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions.教师培训对多项选择题质量的影响。
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2020 Jul-Sep;10(3):210-214. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_30_20. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
3
Will a Short Training Session Improve Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Quality by Dental School Faculty? A Pilot Study.短期培训课程能否提高牙科学院教师编写选择题的质量?一项试点研究。
J Dent Educ. 2017 Aug;81(8):948-955. doi: 10.21815/JDE.017.047.
4
Evaluating the impact of faculty development programme initiative: Are we really improving skills in MCQ writing?评估教师发展计划倡议的影响:我们真的在提高 MCQ 写作技能吗?
J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Oct;71(10):2434-2438. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.1207.
5
Effectiveness of longitudinal faculty development programs on MCQs items writing skills: A follow-up study.纵向教师发展计划对多项选择题编写技能的有效性:一项随访研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 10;12(10):e0185895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185895. eCollection 2017.
6
Does Educator Training or Experience Affect the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions?教育工作者的培训或经验会影响多项选择题的质量吗?
Acad Radiol. 2015 Oct;22(10):1317-22. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
7
A One-Day Dental Faculty Workshop in Writing Multiple-Choice Questions: An Impact Evaluation.一场关于编写选择题的为期一天的牙科学院研讨会:影响评估。
J Dent Educ. 2015 Nov;79(11):1305-13.
8
The Effect of a One-Day Workshop on the Quality of Framing Multiple Choice Questions in Physiology in a Medical College in India.一日研讨会对印度一所医学院生理学多项选择题编制质量的影响。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 24;15(8):e44049. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44049. eCollection 2023 Aug.
9
Writing Multiple Choice Questions-Has the Student Become the Master?编写多项选择题——学生是否已经成为主人?
Teach Learn Med. 2023 Jun-Jul;35(3):356-367. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2050240. Epub 2022 May 1.
10
The Role of Faculty Development in Improving the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions in Dental Education.教师发展在提高牙医学教育多项选择题质量中的作用。
J Dent Educ. 2020 Mar;84(3):316-322. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.189.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the impact of faculty development programme initiative: Are we really improving skills in MCQ writing?评估教师发展计划倡议的影响:我们真的在提高 MCQ 写作技能吗?
J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Oct;71(10):2434-2438. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.1207.
2
Medical students' perception on the usefulness of online formative assessment: A single-center, mixed-method, pilot study.医学生对在线形成性评估有用性的认知:一项单中心、混合方法的试点研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Jul 30;10:243. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1198_20. eCollection 2021.
3
Examining Bloom's Taxonomy in Multiple Choice Questions: Students' Approach to Questions.
在多项选择题中审视布鲁姆教育目标分类法:学生对问题的应对方式
Med Sci Educ. 2021 May 25;31(4):1311-1317. doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01305-y. eCollection 2021 Aug.
4
Evaluation of One-Day Multiple-Choice Question Workshop for Anesthesiology Faculty Members.针对麻醉学教员的一日多项选择题研讨会评估
Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Dec 13;10(6):e111607. doi: 10.5812/aapm.111607. eCollection 2020 Dec.
5
Faculty development program assists the new faculty in constructing high-quality short answer questions; a quasi-experimental study.教师发展项目协助新教师构建高质量的简答题;一项准实验研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 29;16(3):e0249319. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249319. eCollection 2021.
6
Impact of a longitudinal faculty development program on the quality of multiple-choice question item writing in medical education.纵向教师发展计划对医学教育中多项选择题编写质量的影响。
Ann Afr Med. 2021 Jan-Mar;20(1):46-51. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_14_20.
7
E-Workshop on Writing Multiple-Choice Questions: Online Experience during the Period of COVID-19 Crisis.多项选择题写作电子工作坊:新冠疫情危机期间的在线体验
J Microsc Ultrastruct. 2020 Dec 10;8(4):207-210. doi: 10.4103/JMAU.JMAU_30_20. eCollection 2020 Oct-Dec.
8
Evaluating the effectiveness of 'MCQ development workshop using cognitive model framework: A pre-post study.评估“使用认知模型框架的多项选择题开发工作坊”的有效性:一项前后对照研究。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Jan;71(1(A)):119-121. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.1068.
9
Effect of Faculty Training on Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions.教师培训对多项选择题质量的影响。
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2020 Jul-Sep;10(3):210-214. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_30_20. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
10
How to assess? Perceptions and preferences of undergraduate medical students concerning traditional assessment methods.如何评估?本科医学生对传统评估方法的看法和偏好。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Sep 17;20(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02239-6.