• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教师发展项目提高了多项选择题写作的质量。

Faculty development programs improve the quality of Multiple Choice Questions items' writing.

作者信息

Abdulghani Hamza Mohammad, Ahmad Farah, Irshad Mohammad, Khalil Mahmoud Salah, Al-Shaikh Ghadeer Khalid, Syed Sadiqa, Aldrees Abdulmajeed Abdurrahman, Alrowais Norah, Haque Shafiul

机构信息

Department of Medical Education, King Saud University, Riyadh-11321, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Obstetrics &Gynecology, King Saud University, Riyadh-11321, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2015 Apr 1;5:9556. doi: 10.1038/srep09556.

DOI:10.1038/srep09556
PMID:25828516
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4381327/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the utility of long term faculty development programs (FDPs) in order to improve the quality of multiple choice questions (MCQs) items' writing. This was a quasi-experimental study, conducted with newly joined faculty members. The MCQ items were analyzed for difficulty index, discriminating index, reliability, Bloom's cognitive levels, item writing flaws (IWFs) and MCQs' nonfunctioning distractors (NFDs) based test courses of respiratory, cardiovascular and renal blocks. Significant improvement was found in the difficulty index values of pre- to post-training (p = 0.003). MCQs with moderate difficulty and higher discrimination were found to be more in the post-training tests in all three courses. Easy questions were decreased from 36.7 to 22.5%. Significant improvement was also reported in the discriminating indices from 92.1 to 95.4% after training (p = 0.132). More number of higher cognitive level of Bloom's taxonomy was reported in the post-training test items (p<0.0001). Also, NFDs and IWFs were reported less in the post-training items (p<0.02). The MCQs written by the faculties without participating in FDPs are usually of low quality. This study suggests that newly joined faculties need active participation in FDPs as these programs are supportive in improving the quality of MCQs' items writing.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估长期教师发展项目(FDPs)在提高多项选择题(MCQs)命题质量方面的效用。这是一项针对新入职教师开展的准实验研究。基于呼吸、心血管和肾脏模块的测试课程,对MCQs的难度指数、区分指数、信度、布鲁姆认知水平、命题缺陷(IWFs)和MCQs的无效选项(NFDs)进行了分析。结果发现,培训前后的难度指数值有显著改善(p = 0.003)。在所有三门课程的培训后测试中,中等难度和区分度较高的MCQs更多。简单题从36.7%降至22.5%。培训后区分指数也有显著改善,从92.1%提高到95.4%(p = 0.132)。培训后测试题中布鲁姆分类法中更高认知水平的题目数量更多(p<0.0001)。此外,培训后题目的NFDs和IWFs也更少(p<0.02)。未参加FDPs的教师所命制的MCQs质量通常较低。本研究表明,新入职教师需要积极参与FDPs,因为这些项目有助于提高MCQs的命题质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59f5/4381327/16794cfafcda/srep09556-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59f5/4381327/16794cfafcda/srep09556-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59f5/4381327/16794cfafcda/srep09556-f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Faculty development programs improve the quality of Multiple Choice Questions items' writing.教师发展项目提高了多项选择题写作的质量。
Sci Rep. 2015 Apr 1;5:9556. doi: 10.1038/srep09556.
2
Effectiveness of longitudinal faculty development programs on MCQs items writing skills: A follow-up study.纵向教师发展计划对多项选择题编写技能的有效性:一项随访研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 10;12(10):e0185895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185895. eCollection 2017.
3
Writing Multiple Choice Questions-Has the Student Become the Master?编写多项选择题——学生是否已经成为主人?
Teach Learn Med. 2023 Jun-Jul;35(3):356-367. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2050240. Epub 2022 May 1.
4
Effect of Faculty Training on Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions.教师培训对多项选择题质量的影响。
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2020 Jul-Sep;10(3):210-214. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_30_20. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
5
Evaluation of Cognitive levels and Item writing flaws in Medical Pharmacology Internal Assessment Examinations.医学药理学内部评估考试中认知水平及试题编写缺陷的评估
Pak J Med Sci. 2017 Jul-Aug;33(4):866-870. doi: 10.12669/pjms.334.12887.
6
Will a Short Training Session Improve Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Quality by Dental School Faculty? A Pilot Study.短期培训课程能否提高牙科学院教师编写选择题的质量?一项试点研究。
J Dent Educ. 2017 Aug;81(8):948-955. doi: 10.21815/JDE.017.047.
7
Item Analysis of Single Best Response Type Multiple Choice Questions for Formative Assessment in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.妇产科形成性评估中单项最佳答案型多项选择题的项目分析
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2024 Jun;74(3):256-264. doi: 10.1007/s13224-023-01904-2. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
8
The Role of Faculty Development in Improving the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions in Dental Education.教师发展在提高牙医学教育多项选择题质量中的作用。
J Dent Educ. 2020 Mar;84(3):316-322. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.189.
9
Examining the impact of specific types of item-writing flaws on student performance and psychometric properties of the multiple choice question.考察特定类型的命题缺陷对学生成绩以及多项选择题心理测量特性的影响。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2018 Oct 2;7:225. doi: 10.15694/mep.2018.0000225.1. eCollection 2018.
10
Climbing Bloom's taxonomy pyramid: Lessons from a graduate histology course.攀登布鲁姆教育目标分类学金字塔:研究生组织学课程的经验教训。
Anat Sci Educ. 2017 Sep;10(5):456-464. doi: 10.1002/ase.1685. Epub 2017 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
AI-generated multiple-choice questions in health science education: Stakeholder perspectives and implementation considerations.健康科学教育中人工智能生成的多项选择题:利益相关者的观点及实施考量
Curr Res Physiol. 2025 Aug 1;8:100160. doi: 10.1016/j.crphys.2025.100160. eCollection 2025.
2
The Generation and Use of Medical MCQs: A Narrative Review.医学多项选择题的生成与应用:一篇叙述性综述
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025 Aug 5;16:1331-1340. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S513119. eCollection 2025.
3
Progress test in the undergraduate nursing course at a São Paulo public university: progressive knowledge gain reflects curricular characteristics.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of use of a single best answer format in an undergraduate medical examination.本科医学考试中单一最佳答案格式的使用分析。
Qatar Med J. 2013 Nov 1;2013(1):3-6. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2013.1. eCollection 2013.
2
A Comprehensive, Multi-modal Evaluation of the Assessment System of an Undergraduate Research Methodology Course: Translating Theory into Practice.本科研究方法课程评估体系的全面、多模态评价:理论到实践的转化。
Pak J Med Sci. 2014 Mar;30(2):227-32.
3
Research methodology workshops evaluation using the Kirkpatrick's model: translating theory into practice.
圣保罗一所公立大学本科护理课程的进展测试:知识的逐步积累反映了课程特点。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):935. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07346-w.
4
Evaluating the multiple-choice questions quality at the College of Medicine, University of Bisha, Saudi Arabia: a three-year experience.评估沙特阿拉伯比沙大学医学院多项选择题的质量:三年经验
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 13;25(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06700-2.
5
Diagnosing students' misconception in Hydrostatic Pressure through a 4-tier test.通过四级测试诊断学生在流体静力学压力方面的错误概念。
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 20;10(23):e40425. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40425. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.
6
Faculty Perception of Scenario-Based MCQs, SAQs, and MEQs in Medical Education at an Apex Institute.顶尖机构中教员对医学教育中基于情景的选择题、简答题和论述题的看法。
Med Sci Educ. 2024 May 2;34(4):865-871. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02052-6. eCollection 2024 Aug.
7
The impact of repeated item development training on the prediction of medical faculty members' item difficulty index.重复项目开发训练对预测医学教师项目难度指数的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 30;24(1):599. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05577-x.
8
Questioning the questions: Methods used by medical schools to review internal assessment items.质疑这些问题:医学院校用于审查内部评估项目的方法。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2021 Feb 5;10:37. doi: 10.15694/mep.2021.000037.1. eCollection 2021.
9
Assessment of the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions in the Surgery Course for an Integrated Curriculum, University of Bisha College of Medicine, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯比沙大学医学院综合课程外科学课程中多项选择题质量评估
Cureus. 2023 Dec 13;15(12):e50441. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50441. eCollection 2023 Dec.
10
Examining the impact of specific types of item-writing flaws on student performance and psychometric properties of the multiple choice question.考察特定类型的命题缺陷对学生成绩以及多项选择题心理测量特性的影响。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2018 Oct 2;7:225. doi: 10.15694/mep.2018.0000225.1. eCollection 2018.
研究方法学工作坊评估使用 Kirkpatrick 模型:将理论转化为实践。
Med Teach. 2014 Apr;36 Suppl 1:S24-9. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.886012.
4
Identification of technical item flaws leads to improvement of the quality of single best Multiple Choice Questions.发现技术项目缺陷可提高单项最佳选择题的质量。
Pak J Med Sci. 2013 May;29(3):715-8. doi: 10.12669/pjms.293.2993.
5
Analysis of one-best MCQs: the difficulty index, discrimination index and distractor efficiency.单项最佳选择题分析:难度指数、区分指数及干扰项效率
J Pak Med Assoc. 2012 Feb;62(2):142-7.
6
A framework for improving the quality of multiple-choice assessments.提高选择题质量的框架。
Nurse Educ. 2012 May-Jun;37(3):98-104. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e31825041d0.
7
Faculty development program: a guide for medical schools in Arabian Gulf (GCC) countries.院校发展项目:阿拉伯海湾(GCC)国家医学院校指南。
Med Teach. 2012;34 Suppl 1:S61-6. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.656748.
8
Faculty development on item writing substantially improves item quality.开展教师项目写作工作能显著提高试题质量。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012 Aug;17(3):369-76. doi: 10.1007/s10459-011-9315-2. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
9
Further insights into the roles of the medical educator: the importance of scholarly management.对医学教育工作者角色的进一步洞察:学术管理的重要性。
Acad Med. 2009 Aug;84(8):1161-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ace633.
10
An assessment of functioning and non-functioning distractors in multiple-choice questions: a descriptive analysis.评估多选题中的干扰项的功能和非功能:描述性分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2009 Jul 7;9:40. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-9-40.