Communication Disorders and Sciences Program, University of Oregon, Eugene.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Mar 23;63(3):764-773. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00036. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
Purpose The primary purpose of this study was to examine the development of past tense counterfactual (PTCF) sentences ("If the dog had stayed in the house, he would not have bitten the police officer") in young adolescents and young adults, addressing both production and comprehension. The goal was to determine if growth occurs during the years between early adolescence and early adulthood and when or if mastery of these sentences occurs. We also examined the development of past tense irregular verbs to determine growth and mastery. Method The participants included one group of young adolescents ( = 12.44 years, = 80) and one group of young adults ( = 21.30 years, = 80). All were monolingual speakers of Mainstream American English. Using a written language task, each participant completed a set of 40 sentences. For each sentence, the missing element affected the main clause (present perfect verb omitted), the subordinate clause (past perfect verb omitted), or either the main or the subordinate clause (past tense irregular verb omitted). To examine differences in production versus comprehension, half the participants in each group used a fill-in response format (production task), and half used a multiple-choice response format (comprehension task). Results On the PTCF sentences, the adults outperformed the adolescents, comprehension exceeded production, both groups experienced greater difficulty with the past perfect compared to the present perfect verb form, and the adults were more likely to show mastery of PTCF sentences than were the adolescents. Similarly, on the past irregular verbs, the adults outperformed the adolescents, and the adults were more likely to show mastery of these verbs. Implications The findings of this study contribute to the knowledge base in later syntactic development and suggest that some adolescents and adults may require formal instruction in subtle aspects of English grammar used in literate contexts, such as PTCF sentences. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.11971872.
目的 本研究的主要目的是考察青少年和年轻成年人过去时反事实句(“如果狗呆在房子里,它就不会咬警察”)的发展,包括生成和理解。目标是确定从青春期早期到成年早期期间是否存在发展,以及是否掌握这些句子。我们还检查了过去时不规则动词的发展情况,以确定是否存在发展和掌握。 方法 参与者包括一组青少年( = 12.44 岁, = 80)和一组年轻成年人( = 21.30 岁, = 80)。所有参与者均为母语为美式英语的单语者。他们使用书面语言任务完成了 40 个句子。对于每个句子,缺失的元素会影响主句(现在完成时动词省略)、从句(过去完成时动词省略)或主句和从句(过去时不规则动词省略)。为了检查生成和理解之间的差异,每组有一半的参与者使用填空反应格式(生成任务),另一半使用多项选择反应格式(理解任务)。 结果 在反事实句中,成年人的表现优于青少年,理解优于生成,两组对过去完成时的理解都比现在完成时的动词形式困难,成年人更有可能掌握反事实句,而青少年则不太可能掌握。同样,在过去不规则动词方面,成年人的表现优于青少年,并且成年人更有可能掌握这些动词。 意义 本研究的发现有助于丰富后期句法发展的知识基础,并表明一些青少年和成年人可能需要在英语语法的细微方面进行正式指导,例如反事实句。 补充材料 https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.11971872.