Tropical Diseases Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Mar 16;14(3):e0008106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008106. eCollection 2020 Mar.
Lymphatic filariasis has remained endemic in Fiji despite repeated mass drug administration using the well-established and safe combination of diethylcarbamazine and albendazole (DA) since 2002. In certain settings the addition of ivermectin to this combination (IDA) remains a safe strategy and is more efficacious. However, the safety has yet to be described in scabies and soil-transmitted helminth endemic settings like Fiji. Villages of Rotuma and Gau islands were randomised to either DA or IDA. Residents received weight-based treatment unblinded with standard exclusions. Participants were actively found and asked by a nurse about their health daily for the first two days and then asked to seek review for the next five days if unwell. Anyone with severe symptoms were reviewed by a doctor and any serious adverse event was reported to the Medical Monitor and Data Safety Monitoring Board. Of 3612 enrolled and eligible participants, 1216 were randomised to DA and 2396 to IDA. Age and sex in both groups were representative of the population. Over 99% (3598) of participants completed 7 days follow-up. Adverse events were reported by 600 participants (16.7%), distributed equally between treatment groups, with most graded as mild (93.2%). There were three serious adverse events, all judged not attributable to treatment by an independent medical monitor. Fatigue was the most common symptom reported by 8.5%, with headache, dizziness, nausea and arthralgia being the next four most common symptoms. Adverse events were more likely in participants with microfilaremia (43.2% versus 15.7%), but adverse event frequency was not related to the presence of scabies or soil-transmitted helminth infection. IDA has comparable safety to DA with the same frequency of adverse events experienced following community mass drug administration. The presence of co-endemic infections did not increase adverse events. IDA can be used in community programs where preventative chemotherapy is needed for control of lymphatic filariasis and other neglected tropical diseases.
尽管自 2002 年以来,斐济一直在使用经过充分验证和安全的乙胺嗪和阿苯达唑(DA)联合药物进行反复的大规模药物治疗,但淋巴丝虫病仍然在当地流行。在某些情况下,在这种联合用药中添加伊维菌素(IDA)仍然是一种安全的策略,并且更有效。然而,在斐济等存在疥疮和土壤传播性蠕虫流行的环境中,其安全性尚未得到描述。罗图马和高岛的村庄被随机分配到 DA 或 IDA 组。居民根据体重接受不设盲的标准排除法治疗。在头两天,护士每天主动寻找并询问参与者的健康状况,如果感到不适,则在接下来的五天内要求他们寻求复查。任何有严重症状的人都由医生进行复查,并向医疗监测员和数据安全监测委员会报告任何严重不良事件。在 3612 名入组和符合条件的参与者中,有 1216 名被随机分配到 DA 组,2396 名被分配到 IDA 组。两组的年龄和性别均代表了当地的人口情况。超过 99%(3598 名)的参与者完成了 7 天的随访。有 600 名参与者(16.7%)报告了不良事件,两组之间分布均匀,大多数为轻度(93.2%)。有 3 例严重不良事件,均由独立医疗监测员判定与治疗无关。疲劳是最常见的报告症状,占 8.5%,其次是头痛、头晕、恶心和关节痛。微丝蚴血症参与者(43.2%)更有可能出现不良事件,但不良事件的发生频率与疥疮或土壤传播性蠕虫感染无关。IDA 在社区药物治疗中具有与 DA 相同的安全性,且不良反应的发生率相同。同时存在共流行感染并不会增加不良反应的发生。在需要预防化疗来控制淋巴丝虫病和其他被忽视的热带病的社区项目中,可以使用 IDA。