Suppr超能文献

一项开放性标签、随机临床试验,旨在比较伊维菌素加乙胺嗪和阿苯达唑与乙胺嗪加阿苯达唑治疗印度尼西亚班氏丝虫病的耐受性和疗效。

An open label, randomized clinical trial to compare the tolerability and efficacy of ivermectin plus diethylcarbamazine and albendazole vs. diethylcarbamazine plus albendazole for treatment of brugian filariasis in Indonesia.

机构信息

Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Program Studi Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Nusa Cendana, Kupang, Lasiana, Kelapa lima, Kota Kupang, Indonesia.

出版信息

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Mar 29;15(3):e0009294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009294. eCollection 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Improved treatments for lymphatic filariasis (LF) could accelerate the global elimination program for this disease. A triple drug combination of the anti-filarial drugs ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine (DEC) and albendazole (IDA) has been shown to be safe and effective for achieving sustained clearance of microfilariae (Mf) of the filarial parasite Wuchereria bancrofti from human blood. However, the triple drug combination has not been previously been evaluated for treatment of brugian filariasis, which accounts for about 10% of the global LF burden. This hospital-based clinical trial compared the safety and efficacy of IDA with that of the standard treatment (DEC plus albendazole, DA) in persons with Brugia timori infections on Sumba island, Indonesia. Fifty-five asymptomatic persons with B. timori Mf were treated with either a single oral dose of IDA (28 subjects) or with DEC plus albendazole (DA, 27 subjects). Participants were actively monitored for adverse events (AE) for two days after treatment by nurses and physicians who were masked regarding treatment assignments. Passive monitoring was performed by clinical teams that visited participant's home villages for an additional five days. Microfilaremia was assessed by membrane filtration of 1 ml night blood at baseline, at 24h and one year after treatment. IDA was more effective than DA for completely clearing Mf at 24 hours (25/28, 89% vs. 8/27, 30%, P < 0.001). By 12 months after treatment, only one of 27 IDA recipients had Mf in their blood (4%) vs. 10 of 25 (40%) in persons treated with DA (P = 0.002). Approximately 90% of participants had antibodies to recombinant filarial antigen BmR1 at baseline. Antibody prevalence decreased to approximately 30% in both treatment groups at 12 months. About 45% of persons in both treatment groups experienced AE such as fever, muscle aches, lower back, joint and abdominal pain. These were mostly mild and most common during the first two days after treatment. No participant experienced a severe or serious AE. This study showed that IDA was well-tolerated and significantly more effective for clearing B. timori Mf from the blood than DA. Larger studies should be performed to further assess the safety and efficacy of IDA as a mass drug administration regimen to eliminate brugian filariasis. Trial Registration: NCT02899936.

摘要

改良的淋巴丝虫病 (LF) 治疗方法可以加速该疾病的全球消除计划。一种抗丝虫药物伊维菌素、乙胺嗪(DEC)和阿苯达唑(IDA)的三联药物组合已被证明对实现班氏吴策线虫微丝蚴(Mf)从人血中持续清除是安全有效的。然而,这种三联药物组合以前尚未在布尼亚丝虫病的治疗中进行过评估,而布尼亚丝虫病约占全球 LF 负担的 10%。这项基于医院的临床试验比较了伊维菌素与标准治疗(DEC 加阿苯达唑,DA)在印度尼西亚松巴岛患有班氏吴策线虫感染的人的安全性和疗效。55 名无症状的班氏吴策线虫微丝蚴感染者接受了单次口服伊维菌素(28 名受试者)或 DEC 加阿苯达唑(DA,27 名受试者)治疗。护士和医生在治疗后两天内对参与者进行了不良反应 (AE) 的主动监测,他们对治疗分配情况不知情。临床团队在另外五天内对参与者的家乡村庄进行了被动监测。基线时,通过膜过滤 1 毫升夜间血液评估微丝蚴血症,在 24 小时和治疗后 1 年时进行。伊维菌素在 24 小时内完全清除 Mf 的效果优于 DA(25/28,89% vs. 8/27,30%,P < 0.001)。治疗后 12 个月时,伊维菌素组仅 1 名(4%)接受治疗的患者血液中仍有微丝蚴,而 DA 组 25 名(40%)中有 10 名(P = 0.002)。大约 90%的参与者在基线时对重组丝虫抗原 BmR1 有抗体。两组的抗体患病率在 12 个月时均降至约 30%。两组约有 45%的人出现发热、肌肉疼痛、下背部、关节和腹痛等不良事件。这些大多是轻度的,最常见于治疗后前两天。没有参与者经历严重或严重的不良事件。这项研究表明,伊维菌素耐受性良好,清除班氏吴策线虫 Mf 的效果明显优于 DA。应开展更大规模的研究,进一步评估伊维菌素作为消除布尼亚丝虫病的大规模药物管理方案的安全性和疗效。

试验注册

NCT02899936。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2b2/8031952/85c8d44c9264/pntd.0009294.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验