Tropical Diseases, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
PLoS Med. 2021 Nov 10;18(11):e1003849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003849. eCollection 2021 Nov.
Scabies is a neglected tropical disease hyperendemic to many low- and middle-income countries. Scabies can be successfully controlled using mass drug administration (MDA) using 2 doses of ivermectin-based treatment. If effective, a strategy of 1-dose ivermectin-based MDA would have substantial advantages for implementing MDA for scabies at large scale.
We did a cluster randomised, noninferiority, open-label, 3-group unblinded study comparing the effectiveness of control strategies on community prevalence of scabies at 12 months. All residents from 35 villages on 2 Fijian islands were eligible to participate. Villages were randomised 1:1:1 to 2-dose ivermectin-based MDA (IVM-2), 1-dose ivermectin-based MDA (IVM-1), or screen and treat with topical permethrin 5% for individuals with scabies and their household contacts (SAT). All groups also received diethylcarbamazine and albendazole for lymphatic filariasis control. For IVM-2 and IVM-1, oral ivermectin was dosed at 200 μg/kg and when contraindicated substituted with permethrin. We designated a noninferiority margin of 5%. We enrolled 3,812 participants at baseline (July to November 2017) from the 35 villages with median village size of 108 (range 18 to 298). Age and sex of participants were representative of the population with 51.6% male and median age of 25 years (interquartile range 10 to 47). We enrolled 3,898 at 12 months (July to November 2018). At baseline, scabies prevalence was similar in all groups: IVM-2: 11.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 8.5 to 16.0); IVM-1: 15.2% (95% CI 9.4 to 23.8); SAT: 13.6% (95% CI 7.9 to 22.4). At 12 months, scabies decreased substantially in all groups: IVM-2: 1.3% (95% CI 0.6 to 2.5); IVM-1: 2.7% (95% CI 1.1 to 6.5); SAT: 1.1% (95% CI 0.6 to 2.0). The risk difference in scabies prevalence at 12 months between the IVM-1 and IVM-2 groups was 1.2% (95% CI -0.2 to 2.7, p = 0.10). Limitations of the study included the method of scabies diagnosis by nonexperts, a lower baseline prevalence than anticipated, and the addition of diethylcarbamazine and albendazole to scabies treatment.
All 3 strategies substantially reduced prevalence. One-dose was noninferior to 2-dose ivermectin-based MDA, as was a screen and treat approach, for community control of scabies. Further trials comparing these approaches in varied settings are warranted to inform global scabies control strategies.
Clinitrials.gov NCT03177993 and ANZCTR N12617000738325.
疥疮是一种被忽视的热带病,在许多低收入和中等收入国家高度流行。使用基于伊维菌素的 2 剂药物治疗(MDA)可以成功控制疥疮。如果有效,1 剂基于伊维菌素的 MDA 策略将为大规模实施疥疮 MDA 带来巨大优势。
我们进行了一项群组随机、非劣效性、开放性、3 组盲法研究,比较了在 12 个月时控制策略对社区疥疮流行率的有效性。斐济两个岛屿上的 35 个村庄的所有居民都有资格参加。村庄以 1:1:1 的比例随机分为 2 剂伊维菌素为基础的 MDA(IVM-2)、1 剂伊维菌素为基础的 MDA(IVM-1)或对有疥疮和其家庭接触者(SAT)的个体进行筛查和使用 5%扑灭司林治疗(SAT)。所有组还接受乙胺嗪和阿苯达唑以控制淋巴丝虫病。对于 IVM-2 和 IVM-1,口服伊维菌素的剂量为 200 μg/kg,如有禁忌则用扑灭司林替代。我们指定了 5%的非劣效性边界。我们从 35 个村庄中招募了 3812 名参与者,基线时(2017 年 7 月至 11 月),村庄的中位数大小为 108(范围为 18 至 298)。参与者的年龄和性别具有代表性,其中 51.6%为男性,中位数年龄为 25 岁(四分位距为 10 至 47)。我们在 12 个月时(2018 年 7 月至 11 月)招募了 3898 名参与者。基线时,所有组的疥疮患病率相似:IVM-2:11.7%(95%置信区间(CI)为 8.5 至 16.0);IVM-1:15.2%(95%CI 为 9.4 至 23.8);SAT:13.6%(95%CI 为 7.9 至 22.4)。在 12 个月时,所有组的疥疮均显著减少:IVM-2:1.3%(95%CI 为 0.6 至 2.5);IVM-1:2.7%(95%CI 为 1.1 至 6.5);SAT:1.1%(95%CI 为 0.6 至 2.0)。IVM-1 组和 IVM-2 组在 12 个月时疥疮患病率的风险差异为 1.2%(95%CI 为 -0.2 至 2.7,p=0.10)。研究的局限性包括非专家进行的疥疮诊断方法、低于预期的基线患病率以及在疥疮治疗中添加乙胺嗪和阿苯达唑。
所有 3 种策略均显著降低了患病率。1 剂与 2 剂基于伊维菌素的 MDA 一样,筛查和治疗方法在社区疥疮控制方面具有非劣效性。需要在不同环境中比较这些方法的进一步试验,为全球疥疮控制策略提供信息。
Clinitrials.gov NCT03177993 和 ANZCTR N12617000738325。