• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国著名动物福利和兽医护理组织的认知情况。

Perceptions of Prominent Animal Welfare and Veterinary Care Organizations in the United States.

作者信息

Ortez Mario, Bir Courtney, Widmar Nicole Olynk, Wolf Christopher A

机构信息

Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.

Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2020 Mar 12;10(3):472. doi: 10.3390/ani10030472.

DOI:10.3390/ani10030472
PMID:32178242
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7143340/
Abstract

U.S. residents' perceptions of the impact of prominent animal welfare and veterinary care organizations on pet animal well-being and health care may not be linked to the organization's stated mission and effectiveness in advancing it, but to the level of recognition people have for the groups. An online survey of 1000 U.S. residents was used to understand the perceived impact of organizations with self-stated dedication to pet animal well-being. Using a Likert-scale, respondents ranked 13 prominent organizations as having a low to high impact on pet animal well-being and health care. The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) had the highest perceived average impact, while People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) had the lowest. A best-worst scaling (BWS) choice experiment was conducted with 7 of the initial 13 organizations to elicit relative rankings by forcing tradeoffs by respondents. Consistent with the Likert-scale results, the ASPCA was ranked as the most impactful organization. The ASPCA's perceived impact on pet animal well-being and health care may be linked to their high level of recognition among respondents, as this was the organization that respondents most frequently reported having seen/heard stories related to animal well-being and health care.

摘要

美国居民对知名动物福利和兽医护理组织对宠物动物福祉和医疗保健影响的认知,可能并非与该组织宣称的使命及其在推进该使命方面的成效相关,而是与人们对这些组织的认知程度有关。一项针对1000名美国居民的在线调查,旨在了解那些自称致力于宠物动物福祉的组织所产生的感知影响。受访者使用李克特量表,将13个知名组织对宠物动物福祉和医疗保健的影响从低到高进行了排名。美国防止虐待动物协会(ASPCA)的感知平均影响最高,而善待动物组织(PETA)的影响最低。对最初13个组织中的7个进行了最佳-最差标度法(BWS)选择实验,通过迫使受访者进行权衡来得出相对排名。与李克特量表结果一致,美国防止虐待动物协会被评为最具影响力的组织。美国防止虐待动物协会对宠物动物福祉和医疗保健的感知影响,可能与其在受访者中的高认知度有关,因为该组织是受访者最常报告听说过与动物福祉和医疗保健相关故事的组织。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ec8/7143340/8061f16d54a0/animals-10-00472-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ec8/7143340/90bb598c4c59/animals-10-00472-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ec8/7143340/8061f16d54a0/animals-10-00472-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ec8/7143340/90bb598c4c59/animals-10-00472-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ec8/7143340/8061f16d54a0/animals-10-00472-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceptions of Prominent Animal Welfare and Veterinary Care Organizations in the United States.美国著名动物福利和兽医护理组织的认知情况。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Mar 12;10(3):472. doi: 10.3390/ani10030472.
2
Perceptions of Social Responsibility of Prominent Animal Welfare Groups.知名动物福利组织的社会责任认知。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2018 Jan-Mar;21(1):27-39. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2017.1365000. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
3
US Residents' Perceptions of Dog Welfare Needs and Canine Welfare Information Sources.美国居民对犬类福利需求及犬类福利信息来源的看法。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2019 Jan-Mar;22(1):42-68. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2018.1476862. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
4
Effects of demographic factors and information sources on United States consumer perceptions of animal welfare.人口因素和信息来源对美国消费者动物福利认知的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2014 Jul;92(7):3161-73. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-6874.
5
Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies: A Comparison of Discrete Choice and Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling Methods.澳大利亚公众对新医疗技术资金投入的偏好:离散选择法与轮廓案例最佳-最差尺度法的比较
Med Decis Making. 2014 Jul;34(5):638-54. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14526640. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
6
BIOETHICS SYMPOSIUM II: current factors influencing perceptions of animals and their welfare.生物伦理学研讨会二:影响动物认知及其福利的当前因素
J Anim Sci. 2014 May;92(5):1821-31. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-7586. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
7
Grooming-Related Concerns Among Companion Animals: Preliminary Data on an Overlooked Topic and Considerations for Animals' Access to Health-Related Services.伴侣动物中与梳理相关的问题:关于一个被忽视主题的初步数据以及动物获得健康相关服务的考量
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Feb 24;9:827348. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.827348. eCollection 2022.
8
Stated Preferences for Dog Characteristics and Sources of Acquisition.对犬类特征及获取来源的陈述性偏好。
Animals (Basel). 2017 Aug 5;7(8):59. doi: 10.3390/ani7080059.
9
Exploring Social Desirability Bias in Perceptions of Dog Adoption: All's Well that Ends Well? Or Does the Method of Adoption Matter?探索对狗狗领养认知中的社会期望偏差:结局好就一切都好?还是领养方式很重要?
Animals (Basel). 2018 Sep 13;8(9):154. doi: 10.3390/ani8090154.
10
Perceptions of Animal Welfare With a Special Focus on Turkeys.对动物福利的认知,特别关注火鸡。
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Nov 21;6:413. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00413. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Just Love Me, Feed Me, Never Leave Me: Understanding Pet Food Anxiety, Feeding and Shopping Behavior of US Pet Owners in Covidian Times.只要爱我、喂养我、永不离开我:了解新冠疫情时期美国宠物主人的宠物食品焦虑、喂养及购物行为。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Oct 30;11(11):3101. doi: 10.3390/ani11113101.

本文引用的文献

1
Traditional attributes moo-ve over for some consumer segments: Relative ranking of fluid milk attributes.传统属性让位于某些消费群体:液态奶属性的相对排名。
Appetite. 2019 Mar 1;134:162-171. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.12.007. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
2
US Residents' Perceptions of Dog Welfare Needs and Canine Welfare Information Sources.美国居民对犬类福利需求及犬类福利信息来源的看法。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2019 Jan-Mar;22(1):42-68. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2018.1476862. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
3
Perceptions of Social Responsibility of Prominent Animal Welfare Groups.
知名动物福利组织的社会责任认知。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2018 Jan-Mar;21(1):27-39. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2017.1365000. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
4
Effects of demographic factors and information sources on United States consumer perceptions of animal welfare.人口因素和信息来源对美国消费者动物福利认知的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2014 Jul;92(7):3161-73. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-6874.
5
Impact of the owner-pet and client-veterinarian bond on the care that pets receive.主人与宠物以及客户与兽医之间的关系对宠物所接受护理的影响。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2008 Feb 15;232(4):531-40. doi: 10.2460/javma.232.4.531.
6
Using grounded theory to examine people's attitudes toward how animals are used.运用扎根理论来研究人们对动物使用方式的态度。
Soc Anim. 2003;11(4):307-27. doi: 10.1163/156853003322796064.