• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

马来西亚结直肠癌腹腔镜辅助前切除术的首次可行性研究及短期结果

First Feasibility Study and Short-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic-Assisted Anterior Resection in Colorectal Cancer in Malaysia.

作者信息

Tan Henry Chor Lip, Tan Jih Huei, Nur Dzainuddin Nur Akmalrudin, Chan Koon Khee

机构信息

Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital Sultanah Aminah, Johor Bahru, Malaysia.

Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

Ann Coloproctol. 2020 Apr;36(2):94-101. doi: 10.3393/ac.2019.05.10. Epub 2020 Mar 16.

DOI:10.3393/ac.2019.05.10
PMID:32178501
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7299566/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic-assisted anterior resection (LAAR) for colorectal cancer in a local Asian population.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of all patients with colorectal cancer operated from November 2017 to October 2018. Main variables of interest were demography, type and surgery, length of stay (LOS), and the involvement of proximal and distal doughnut. Postoperative complications were analysed using chi-square or Fisher exact and Mann-Whitney tests.

RESULTS

There were 23 patients with a mean age of 62.5 ± 12.2 years. The mean time from diagnosis to surgery was 97.1 ± 154.84 days. There were 12 patients in the LAAR group and 11 in the open anterior resection (OAR) group. Duration of surgery was shorter in OAR (129.58 ± 51.38 minutes) compared to LAAR (147.91 ± 39.37 minutes). Mean LOS was shorter in the LAAR group with 5±1.5 days compared to the OAR group of 7.42 ± 4.25 days. However, there was no significant P-value for both duration of surgery (P = 0.322) or LOS (P = 0.87). A total of 3 complications were recorded after OAR and 2 after LAAR. Both groups had clear proximal and distal margins with 16 (12-18.5) harvested lymph nodes in LAAR and 18 (16-22) in OAR, which were equal (P = 0.155).

CONCLUSION

This study reports a shorter LOS in the minimally invasive group of 2 days with similar oncologic resection outcomes. This shows that LAAR is feasible in Malaysia and has potential outcome benefits.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在证明在亚洲当地人群中,腹腔镜辅助前切除术(LAAR)治疗结直肠癌的可行性和安全性。

方法

这是一项对2017年11月至2018年10月期间所有接受结直肠癌手术患者的回顾性研究。主要关注变量包括人口统计学、手术类型、住院时间(LOS)以及近端和远端切缘情况。使用卡方检验、Fisher精确检验和曼-惠特尼检验分析术后并发症。

结果

共有23例患者,平均年龄为62.5±12.2岁。从诊断到手术的平均时间为97.1±154.84天。LAAR组有12例患者,开放前切除术(OAR)组有11例患者。与LAAR(147.91±39.37分钟)相比,OAR的手术时间更短(129.58±51.38分钟)。LAAR组的平均住院时间为5±1.5天,短于OAR组的7.42±4.25天。然而,手术时间(P = 0.322)和住院时间(P = 0.87)的P值均无统计学意义。OAR术后共记录3例并发症,LAAR术后记录2例并发症。两组的近端和远端切缘均清晰,LAAR组采集的淋巴结数量为16(12 - 18.5)枚,OAR组为18(16 - 22)枚,两组数量相当(P = 0.155)。

结论

本研究报告微创组的住院时间缩短了2天,肿瘤切除效果相似。这表明LAAR在马来西亚是可行的,且具有潜在的良好预后效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0235/7299566/11794c38cfb8/ac-2019-05-10f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0235/7299566/11794c38cfb8/ac-2019-05-10f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0235/7299566/11794c38cfb8/ac-2019-05-10f1.jpg

相似文献

1
First Feasibility Study and Short-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic-Assisted Anterior Resection in Colorectal Cancer in Malaysia.马来西亚结直肠癌腹腔镜辅助前切除术的首次可行性研究及短期结果
Ann Coloproctol. 2020 Apr;36(2):94-101. doi: 10.3393/ac.2019.05.10. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
2
The short-term outcomes of conventional and single-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.传统腹腔镜手术与单孔腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的短期疗效比较。
Ann Surg. 2011 Dec;254(6):933-40. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318237826b.
3
[Efficacy comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].机器人辅助与腹腔镜手术治疗中低位直肠癌的疗效比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):377-383. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20190401-00135.
4
Laparoscopic- vs. hand-assisted ultralow anterior resection: a prospective study.腹腔镜与手辅助超低位前切除术:一项前瞻性研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Jan;51(1):26-31. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9107-1. Epub 2007 Dec 18.
5
Prospective study of ambulation after open and laparoscopic colorectal resection.开放和腹腔镜结直肠切除术后活动能力的前瞻性研究。
Surg Innov. 2009 Mar;16(1):16-20. doi: 10.1177/1553350608330478. Epub 2009 Jan 4.
6
A novel hand-assisted laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项针对右半结肠癌的新型手辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2017 Jul 26;18(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2084-3.
7
A safety study of transumbilical single incision versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.经脐单切口与传统腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的安全性研究:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Nov 30;16:539. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1067-5.
8
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜辅助手术治疗结直肠癌:一项荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5601-5614. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4892-z. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
9
Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopic assisted right colectomy for cancer.全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌根治术的比较。
Int J Surg. 2012;10(6):290-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.04.020. Epub 2012 May 4.
10
There is no difference in outcome between laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis on short- and long-term oncologic outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗直肠癌的疗效无差异:短期和长期肿瘤学结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Aug;21(8):595-604. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1662-4. Epub 2017 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Critical adjustments and trauma surgery trends in adaptation to COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia.马来西亚在适应新冠疫情过程中的关键调整及创伤外科手术趋势
Chin J Traumatol. 2020 Aug;23(4):207-210. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2020.05.007. Epub 2020 May 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic vs open rectal excision for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹直肠切除术治疗直肠癌的短期临床结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov 28;23(44):7906-7916. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i44.7906.
2
There is no difference in outcome between laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis on short- and long-term oncologic outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗直肠癌的疗效无差异:短期和长期肿瘤学结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Aug;21(8):595-604. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1662-4. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
3
Survival rates and predictors of survival among colorectal cancer patients in a Malaysian tertiary hospital.
马来西亚一家三级医院结直肠癌患者的生存率及生存预测因素
BMC Cancer. 2017 May 18;17(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3336-z.
4
A Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗直肠癌的随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 9;373(2):194. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1505367.
5
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in learning curve: Role of implementation of a standardized technique and recovery protocol. A cohort study.学习曲线中的腹腔镜结直肠手术:标准化技术与恢复方案实施的作用。一项队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2015 Mar 20;4(2):89-94. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2015.03.003. eCollection 2015 Jun.
6
A review of colorectal cancer research in malaysia.马来西亚结直肠癌研究综述。
Med J Malaysia. 2014 Aug;69 Suppl A:23-32.
7
Laparoscopic versus open low anterior resection for rectal cancer: results from the national cancer data base.腹腔镜与开放手术行直肠癌低位前切除术:来自国家癌症数据库的结果
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Jan;19(1):124-31; discussion 131-2. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2614-1. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
8
Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancers: Current status.结直肠癌的腹腔镜手术:现状
J Minim Access Surg. 2006 Dec;2(4):205-10. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.28181.
9
Improving the quality of colon cancer surgery through a surgical education program.通过外科教育计划提高结肠癌手术质量。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Dec;53(12):1594-603. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181f433e3.
10
Laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma: complications and management in 132 consecutive patients.腹腔镜低位前切除术治疗直肠癌:132 例连续患者的并发症及处理。
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep 28;16(36):4605-10. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i36.4605.