San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, ASL Città di Torino, P.zza Donatore di Sangue, 3, 10154, Turin, Italy.
Department of Control and Computer Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, 10129, Turin, Italy.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 16;20(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05084-x.
The paper aims to describe the 3-year incidence (2015/17) of aggressive acts against all healthcare workers to identify risk factors associated to violence among a variety of demographic and professional determinants of assaulted, and risk factors related to the circumstances surrounding these events.
A retrospective observational study of all 10,970 health workers in a large-sized Italian university hospital was performed. The data, obtained from the "Aggression Reporting Form", which must be completed by assaulted workers within 72 h of aggression, were collected for the following domains: worker assaulted (sex, age class, years worked); profession (nurses, medical doctors, non-medical support staff, administrative staff, midwives); aggressive acts (activity type during aggressive acts, season, time and location of aggressive acts); and type of aggressive acts (verbal, non-verbal, consequences, aggressors).
Three hundred sixty-four (3.3%) workers experienced almost one aggression. The majority of the assaulted workers were female (77.5%), had worked for 6/15 years and were Nurses (64.3%). The majority of aggressive acts occurred during assistance and patient care (38.2%), in the spring and during the afternoon/morning shifts and took place in locations where patients were present (47.3%). The most prevalent aggression type was verbal (76.9%). The patient was the most common aggressor (46.7%). 56% of those assaulted experienced interruptions in their work. Being female, being < 50 years of age, having worked for 6-15 years were significant risk factors for aggression. Midwives suffered the highest risk of experiencing aggression (RR = 12.95). The risk analysis showed that non-verbally aggressive acts were related to assistance and patient care with respect to activity type, to the presence of patients and during the spring and afternoon/evening.
The findings suggest the parallel use of future qualitative studies to clarify the motivation behind aggression. These suggestions are needed for the implementation of additional adequate prevention strategies on either an organizational or a personal level.
本文旨在描述 2015/17 年针对所有医护人员的攻击行为发生率,以确定与各种人口统计学和职业决定因素相关的暴力行为风险因素,以及与这些事件相关的环境因素相关的风险因素。
对一家大型意大利大学医院的 10970 名卫生工作者进行了回顾性观察性研究。这些数据来自于“攻击报告表”,该表必须在攻击发生后 72 小时内由受攻击的工作人员填写,收集的信息包括:工作人员(性别、年龄组、工作年限);职业(护士、医生、非医疗支持人员、行政人员、助产士);攻击行为(攻击行为期间的活动类型、季节、时间和地点);以及攻击行为的类型(言语、非言语、后果、攻击者)。
364 名(3.3%)工作人员经历了近一次攻击。受攻击的工作人员大多数是女性(77.5%),工作了 6/15 年,是护士(64.3%)。大多数攻击行为发生在协助和患者护理期间(38.2%),在春季和下午/上午轮班期间,发生在有患者在场的地方(47.3%)。最常见的攻击类型是言语(76.9%)。患者是最常见的攻击者(46.7%)。56%的受攻击人员的工作受到干扰。女性、年龄<50 岁、工作 6-15 年是攻击的显著风险因素。助产士遭受攻击的风险最高(RR=12.95)。风险分析表明,非言语攻击与活动类型、患者在场情况以及春季和下午/傍晚时的协助和患者护理有关。
研究结果表明,未来需要并行使用定性研究来澄清攻击背后的动机。这些建议对于在组织或个人层面上实施额外的适当预防策略是必要的。