Ayaz Basnama, Dozois Graham, Baumann Andrea L, Fuseini Adam, Nelson Sioban
Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Sep 6;4(9):e0003646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003646. eCollection 2024.
In healthcare settings worldwide, workplace violence (WPV) has been extensively studied. However, significantly less is known about gender-based WPV and the characteristics of perpetrators. We conducted a comprehensive scoping review on Type II (directed by consumers) and Type III (perpetuated by healthcare workers) gender based-WPV among nurses and physicians globally. For the review, we followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta Analyses extension for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR). The protocol for the comprehensive review was registered on the Open Science Framework on January 14, 2022, at https://osf.io/t4pfb/. A systematic search in five health and social science databases yielded 178 relevant studies that indicated types of perpetrators, with only 34 providing descriptive data for perpetrators' gender. Across both types of WPV, men (65.1%) were more frequently responsible for perpetuating WPV compared to women (28.2%) and both genders (6.7%). Type II WPV, demonstrated a higher incidence of violence against women; linked to the gendered roles, stereotypes, and societal expectations that allocate specific responsibilities based on gender. Type III WPV was further categorized into Type III-A (horizontal) and Type III-B (vertical). With Type III WPV, gendered power structures and stereotypes contributed to a permissive environment for violence by men and women that victimized more women. These revelations emphasize the pressing need for gender-sensitive strategies for addressing WPV within the healthcare sector. Policymakers must prioritize the security of healthcare workers, especially women, through reforms and zero-tolerance policies. Promoting gender equality and empowerment within the workforce and leadership is pivotal. Additionally, creating a culture of inclusivity, support, and respect, led by senior leadership, acknowledging WPV as a structural issue and enabling an open dialogue across all levels are essential for combating this pervasive problem.
在全球范围内的医疗环境中,工作场所暴力(WPV)已得到广泛研究。然而,对于基于性别的工作场所暴力以及施暴者的特征,我们所知甚少。我们对全球护士和医生中基于性别的第二类(由消费者主导)和第三类(由医护人员实施)工作场所暴力进行了全面的范围界定审查。对于此次审查,我们遵循了系统评价与Meta分析扩展版的范围界定审查首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)。全面审查的方案于2022年1月14日在开放科学框架(https://osf.io/t4pfb/)上进行了注册。在五个健康和社会科学数据库中进行的系统检索产生了178项相关研究,这些研究表明了施暴者的类型,其中只有34项提供了施暴者性别的描述性数据。在这两类工作场所暴力中,男性(65.1%)比女性(28.2%)和两性(6.7%)更频繁地实施工作场所暴力。第二类工作场所暴力显示出针对女性的暴力发生率更高;这与基于性别的角色、刻板印象以及根据性别分配特定责任的社会期望有关。第三类工作场所暴力进一步分为第三类-A(横向)和第三类-B(纵向)。对于第三类工作场所暴力,基于性别的权力结构和刻板印象为男性和女性实施暴力营造了一种宽容的环境,而受害女性更多。这些发现强调了在医疗保健部门应对工作场所暴力时迫切需要采取对性别问题有敏感认识的策略。政策制定者必须通过改革和零容忍政策,将医护人员尤其是女性的安全作为优先事项。在劳动力队伍和领导层中促进性别平等和赋权至关重要。此外,由高层领导引领营造一种包容、支持和尊重的文化,将工作场所暴力视为一个结构性问题并促成各级之间的开放对话,对于解决这一普遍问题至关重要。