Dipartimento di Medicina e Scienze della Salute 'Vincenzo Tiberio', Università degli Studi del Molise, Campobasso, Italy
Dipartimento di Medicina e Scienze della Salute 'Vincenzo Tiberio', Università degli Studi del Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
RMD Open. 2020 Mar;6(1). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001170.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the discriminant capability of the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) according to disease activity, remission/low disease activity indices and quality of life indices in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
Consecutive patients with PsA were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. At each visit, the patients underwent a complete physical examination and their clinical/laboratory data were collected. Disease activity was assessed using the Disease Activity Score for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) and remission/low disease activity using the DAPSA minimal disease activity (MDA) and very low disease activity (VLDA) criteria. The Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) and the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index scores were also collected. Finally, PASS was assessed by asking all patients to answer yes or no to a single question.
Patients who answered yes to PASS showed a significantly better overall mean DAPSA score than those who were not in PASS. Furthermore, patients in PASS showed a significantly lower level of systemic inflammation, lower Leeds Enthesitis Index score, a significantly lower impact of disease (PsAID), lower pain and better function than patients who answered no to PASS. A moderate to good agreement was found between PASS, MDA, DAPSA low disease activity and PsAID score ≤4. Good sensitivity and specificity were found with PASS with respect to DAPSA low disease activity, and although PASS is sensitive in the identification of patients with MDA, DAPSA remission and VLDA it lacks of specificity.
This study showed that PASS might be used as an alternative to determine disease activity in patients with PsA in real clinical practice, mainly in patients with low disease activity according to DAPSA criteria.
本研究旨在评估患者可接受的症状状态(PASS)根据疾病活动度、缓解/低疾病活动度指数和生活质量指数在银屑病关节炎(PsA)患者中的鉴别能力。
本横断面研究纳入了连续就诊的银屑病关节炎患者。在每次就诊时,患者均接受全面的体格检查,并收集其临床/实验室数据。采用银屑病关节炎疾病活动度评分(DAPSA)评估疾病活动度,采用 DAPSA 低疾病活动度(MDA)和极低疾病活动度(VLDA)标准评估缓解/低疾病活动度。还收集了银屑病关节炎对疾病的影响(PsAID)和健康评估问卷残疾指数评分。最后,通过询问所有患者是否对一个问题回答“是”或“否”来评估 PASS。
对 PASS 回答“是”的患者的平均总体 DAPSA 评分明显好于未通过 PASS 的患者。此外,PASS 患者的全身炎症水平明显较低,Leeds 附着点指数评分明显较低,疾病影响(PsAID)明显较低,疼痛明显较低,功能明显较好,对 PASS 的回答“否”的患者。在 PASS、MDA、DAPSA 低疾病活动度和 PsAID 评分≤4 之间发现了中度至良好的一致性。PASS 对 DAPSA 低疾病活动度具有良好的敏感性和特异性,尽管 PASS 在识别 MDA、DAPSA 缓解和 VLDA 患者方面具有敏感性,但缺乏特异性。
本研究表明,PASS 可在真实临床实践中替代确定银屑病关节炎患者的疾病活动度,特别是在符合 DAPSA 标准的低疾病活动度患者中。