López-Medina Clementina, Gorlier Clémence, Orbai Ana-Maria, Coates Laura C, Kiltz Uta, Leung Ying-Ying, Palominos Penelope, Cañete Juan D, Scrivo Rossana, Balanescu Andra, Dernis Emmanuelle, Meisalu Sandra, Ruyssen-Witrand Adeline, Soubrier Martin, Aydin Sibel Zehra, Eder Lihi, Gaydukova Inna, Lubrano Ennio, Kalyoncu Umut, Richette Pascal, Husni M Elaine, Smolen Josef S, de Wit Maarten, Gossec Laure
Medical and Surgical Sciences Department, University of Cordoba, Reina Sofia Hospital, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Cordoba, Spain.
Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 May 1;64(5):3090-3094. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaf002.
To explore thresholds for the Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Impact of Disease questionnaire (PsAID12) score against disease activity measures in an observational setting, in patients with PsA.
The baseline data from the ReFlaP observational, prospective, multicentre and international study were used (NCT03119805). Cutoffs for PsAID12 were determined against disease activity scores, defining disease impact states (i.e. remission, low impact, moderate impact and high impact). Statistics used to assess the optimal cutoff point included Youden's index and the 75th percentile method, with external anchors (i.e. Disease Activity index for Psoriatic Arthritis [DAPSA], very low disease activity [VLDA]/minimal disease activity [MDA] and single questions for both patients and physicians) serving as gold standards. The diagnostic performance of these cutoffs was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses.
A total of 410 patients were analysed. Mean (s.d.) PsAID12 score was 3.4 (2.5). The prevalence of remission varied between 12.4% and 36.1%, while low disease activity ranged from 37.8% to 59.8%. PsAID12 performed well against external anchors, with high areas under the ROC curves ranging from 0.75 to 0.94. Using the DAPSA as external anchor, the proposed PsAID12 cutoffs were <1.7 for remission, ≥1.7 to ≤3.1 for low impact, >3.1 to <4.8 for moderate impact and ≥4.8 for high impact. Compared with composite scores, patient and physician opinions performed less stringently.
This study established cutoffs for PsAID12 in a clinical practice observational population, corresponding to remission and varying levels of disease impact. However, these proposed cutoffs need further validation, and an expert consensus is essential to confirm the most accurate thresholds for future use.
在一项观察性研究中,探索银屑病关节炎(PsA)疾病影响问卷(PsAID12)评分相对于疾病活动度指标的阈值,研究对象为PsA患者。
使用ReFlaP观察性、前瞻性、多中心国际研究的基线数据(NCT03119805)。根据疾病活动度评分确定PsAID12的截断值,定义疾病影响状态(即缓解、低影响、中度影响和高影响)。用于评估最佳截断点的统计方法包括约登指数和第75百分位数法,以外在参照标准(即银屑病关节炎疾病活动指数[DAPSA]、极低疾病活动度[VLDA]/最小疾病活动度[MDA]以及患者和医生的单项问题)作为金标准。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估这些截断值的诊断性能。
共分析了410例患者。PsAID12评分的均值(标准差)为3.4(2.5)。缓解率在12.4%至36.1%之间变化,而低疾病活动度范围为37.8%至59.8%。PsAID12相对于外在参照标准表现良好,ROC曲线下面积较高,范围为0.75至0.94。以DAPSA作为外在参照标准,建议的PsAID12截断值为:缓解时<1.7,低影响时≥1.7至≤3.1,中度影响时>3.1至<4.8,高影响时≥4.8。与综合评分相比,患者和医生的意见标准较宽松。
本研究在临床实践观察人群中确定了PsAID12的截断值,对应于缓解以及不同程度的疾病影响。然而,这些建议的截断值需要进一步验证,专家共识对于确认未来使用的最准确阈值至关重要。