• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿布扎比一家三级护理医院的“即看即治”诊所服务评估

'See and Treat' Clinic Service Evaluation at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Abu Dhabi.

作者信息

Ghaleb Ward Ebrahim Abdullah, Almemari Ayesha, Qayyum Hasan

机构信息

Emergency Medicine, Mafraq Hospital, Abu Dhabi, UAE.

Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, Mafraq Hospital, Abu Dhabi, UAE.

出版信息

Oman Med J. 2020 Mar 8;35(2):e104. doi: 10.5001/omj.2020.22. eCollection 2020 Mar.

DOI:10.5001/omj.2020.22
PMID:32181006
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7060901/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the performance provided at a 'See and Treat' (ST) clinic at a tertiary hospital emergency department (ED) in Abu Dhabi, UAE, and to assess its impact on ED crowding.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective electronic medical chart review and database analyses. We included patients triaged as triage level 4 (T4) and triage level 5 (T5) as per the Emergency Severity Index treated at ED in the ST clinic and other ED areas, including the off-site Urgent Care Centre (UCC) between 1 June 2016 and 30 June 2017. We analyzed a group of process and outcome measures at our ST clinic and compared them to the same measures in other areas of our ED and the co-located UCC. The process measure analyzed was the door-to-doctor time. In addition, the outcome measures analyzed were the door-to-door time, unplanned return within 72 hours, and feedback from T4 and T5 triaged patients treated at the clinic.

RESULTS

The number of patients enrolled in the study was 43 109. Of these, 11 329 (26.3%) patients were treated at the ST clinic, 6328 (14.7%) were treated at the UCC, and 25 452 (59.0%) were treated at the main ED. The door-to-doctor time was within 30 minutes for 89.0% of ST clinic patients, and 94.0% of patients experienced a door-to-door time of within two hours; 2.1% of these patients returned within 72 hours. Among these, 78.7% returned for an issue related to their first visit. However, none of the patients were admitted on their return visit. For patients presenting to UCC and other parts of our ED, we recorded a door-to-doctor time of within 30 minutes for 80.5% of patients and a door-to-door time of within two hours for 73.0% of patients. We found the difference in waiting times (i.e., door-to-doctor times between ST clinic patients and the rest of ED) to be statistically significant ( < 0.001, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56-0.63). However, on comparing door-to-door times, we found the difference between ST clinic patients and the rest of ED patients was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Door-to-doctor times were shorter in ST clinics compared to other parts of our ED, but there was no statistically significant difference in door-to-door times when comparing ST clinics to the rest of the ED. ST clinic patients had a lower rate of unplanned return within 72 hours, of which, none required admission on the return attendance. We believe ST clinics have a positive impact on reducing ED crowding but acknowledge they are one of the many plausible solutions attributing to optimized patient flow in the ED.

摘要

目的

我们试图评估阿联酋阿布扎比一家三级医院急诊科(ED)的“即看即治”(ST)诊所所提供的服务,并评估其对急诊科拥挤情况的影响。

方法

我们进行了回顾性电子病历审查和数据库分析。纳入了2016年6月1日至2017年6月30日期间在ST诊所和急诊科其他区域(包括场外紧急护理中心(UCC))按照急诊严重程度指数分诊为4级(T4)和5级(T5)的患者。我们分析了ST诊所的一组过程和结果指标,并将其与急诊科其他区域和同地的UCC的相同指标进行比较。分析的过程指标是门到医生时间。此外,分析的结果指标是门到门时间、72小时内非计划复诊以及在诊所接受治疗的T4和T5分诊患者的反馈。

结果

纳入研究的患者有43109例。其中,11329例(26.3%)在ST诊所接受治疗,6328例(14.7%)在UCC接受治疗,25452例(59.0%)在主急诊科接受治疗。ST诊所89.0%的患者门到医生时间在30分钟内,94.0%的患者门到门时间在两小时内;这些患者中有2.1%在72小时内复诊。其中,78.7%的患者因首次就诊相关问题复诊。然而,复诊患者均未被收治。对于在UCC和急诊科其他区域就诊的患者,我们记录到80.5%的患者门到医生时间在30分钟内,73.0%的患者门到门时间在两小时内。我们发现等待时间(即ST诊所患者与急诊科其他患者的门到医生时间)的差异具有统计学意义(<0.001,95%置信区间(CI):0.56 - 0.63)。然而,在比较门到门时间时,我们发现ST诊所患者与急诊科其他患者之间的差异无统计学意义。

结论

与急诊科其他区域相比,ST诊所的门到医生时间更短,但将ST诊所与急诊科其他区域比较时,门到门时间无统计学显著差异。ST诊所患者72小时内非计划复诊率较低,其中复诊时均无需收治。我们认为ST诊所对缓解急诊科拥挤有积极影响,但也承认它们是优化急诊科患者流程的众多可行解决方案之一。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d39/7060901/f1cef9d3f6a2/OMJ-35-02-1800174-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d39/7060901/f1cef9d3f6a2/OMJ-35-02-1800174-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d39/7060901/f1cef9d3f6a2/OMJ-35-02-1800174-f1.jpg

相似文献

1
'See and Treat' Clinic Service Evaluation at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Abu Dhabi.阿布扎比一家三级护理医院的“即看即治”诊所服务评估
Oman Med J. 2020 Mar 8;35(2):e104. doi: 10.5001/omj.2020.22. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
Medical Team Evaluation: Effect on Emergency Department Waiting Time and Length of Stay.医疗团队评估:对急诊科候诊时间和住院时间的影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 22;11(4):e0154372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154372. eCollection 2016.
3
Assessing sensitivity and specificity of the Manchester Triage System in the evaluation of acute coronary syndrome in adult patients in emergency care: a systematic review protocol.评估曼彻斯特分诊系统在急诊护理中评估成年急性冠状动脉综合征患者时的敏感性和特异性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):64-73. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2213.
4
A method for improving arrival-to-electrocardiogram time in emergency department chest pain patients and the effect on door-to-balloon time for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.一种提高急诊科胸痛患者心电图到达时间的方法及其对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者门球时间的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Oct;16(10):921-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00493.x. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
5
Variability of door-to-device times at a rural tertiary care center.农村三级医疗中心门到设备时间的可变性。
Clin Med Res. 2014 Dec;12(3-4):138-46. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2014.1221. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
6
The Effectiveness and Relevance of the Canadian Triage System at Times of Overcrowding in the Emergency Department of a Private Tertiary Hospital: A United Arab Emirates (UAE) Study.一家私立三级医院急诊科拥挤时加拿大分诊系统的有效性及相关性:阿拉伯联合酋长国(阿联酋)的一项研究
Cureus. 2024 Jan 25;16(1):e52921. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52921. eCollection 2024 Jan.
7
Emergency department triage of acute myocardial infarction patients and the effect on outcomes.急性心肌梗死患者的急诊科分诊及其对预后的影响。
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Jun;53(6):736-45. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.11.011. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
8
To GP or not to GP: a natural experiment in children triaged to see a GP in a tertiary paediatric emergency department (ED).是否看全科医生:在三级儿科急诊分诊看全科医生的儿童自然试验。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Jul;27(7):521-528. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006605. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
9
Association of Emergency Department Length of Stay and Crowding for Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者急诊科住院时间与拥挤情况的关联
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;16(7):1067-72. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.8.27908. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
10
Appropriateness of cases presenting in the emergency department following ambulance service secondary telephone triage: a retrospective cohort study.救护车服务二级电话分诊后在急诊科就诊病例的适宜性:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 15;7(10):e016845. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016845.

引用本文的文献

1
Enlightening Hidden Nursing Care in Nurse-Led Clinics and See & Treat: An Observational Multicenter Protocol Study in Italy.探索护士主导诊所和即看即治模式中的隐性护理:意大利一项多中心观察性方案研究
Nurs Rep. 2024 Nov 29;14(4):3754-3764. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14040274.

本文引用的文献

1
Emergency department crowding: A systematic review of causes, consequences and solutions.急诊科拥挤:原因、后果和解决方案的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 30;13(8):e0203316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203316. eCollection 2018.
2
Effect of crowding on length of stay for common chief complaints in the emergency department: A STROBE cohort study.急诊科常见主诉拥挤对住院时间的影响:一项STROBE队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Nov;96(44):e8457. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008457.
3
The impact of ED crowding on early interventions and mortality in patients with severe sepsis.
急诊拥挤对严重脓毒症患者早期干预及死亡率的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Jul;35(7):953-960. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.01.061. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
4
Door-to-Imaging Time for Acute Stroke Patients Is Adversely Affected by Emergency Department Crowding.急诊科拥挤对急性卒中患者的门到影像检查时间产生不利影响。
Stroke. 2017 Jan;48(1):49-54. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015131. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
5
Improving emergency department patient flow.改善急诊科患者流程。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2016 Jun 30;3(2):63-68. doi: 10.15441/ceem.16.127. eCollection 2016 Jun.
6
Overcrowding in emergency department: an international issue.急诊科过度拥挤:一个国际性问题。
Intern Emerg Med. 2015 Mar;10(2):171-5. doi: 10.1007/s11739-014-1154-8. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
7
Increases in emergency department occupancy are associated with adverse 30-day outcomes.急诊科占用率的增加与30天不良结局相关。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;21(10):1092-100. doi: 10.1111/acem.12480.
8
Emergency Department Crowding is Associated with Reduced Satisfaction Scores in Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department.急诊科拥挤与急诊科出院患者满意度评分降低有关。
West J Emerg Med. 2013 Feb;14(1):11-5. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2011.11.11456.
9
An association between occupancy rates in the emergency department and rates of violence toward staff.急诊科的占用率与针对工作人员的暴力发生率之间的关联。
J Emerg Med. 2012 Oct;43(4):736-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.06.131. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
10
High hospital occupancy is associated with increased risk for patients boarding in the emergency department.高医院入住率与急诊患者留观的风险增加相关。
Am J Med. 2012 Apr;125(4):416.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.07.030. Epub 2012 Feb 3.