• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在伊朗普通人群中开发和验证功能性、沟通性及批判性健康素养问卷。

Developing and Validating the Functional, Communicative, and Critical Health Literacy Questionnaire among the Iranian General Population.

作者信息

Miri Mohammad Reza, Moghadam Hakimeh Malaki, Eftekhari Hedieh, Yousefi Azam, Norozi Ensiyeh

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.

Department of Statistics, Birjand University, Birjand, Iran.

出版信息

Oman Med J. 2020 Mar 12;35(2):e106. doi: 10.5001/omj.2020.24. eCollection 2020 Mar.

DOI:10.5001/omj.2020.24
PMID:32181008
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7066379/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Many scales have been developed to assess health literacy. These scales have been developed extensively in clinical populations in developed countries. Our study describes the process of development and validation of the Health Literacy Questionnaire to measure health literacy in the general Iranian population.

METHODS

We followed the scale development process outlined by Schwab in 1980. After a comprehensive review of the research published on Nutbeam's definition of health literacy and its measurement, two focus groups were considered to generate a pool of items. We then assessed the face validity and content validity of the items. The final version of the questionnaire was subject to independent exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The internal consistency of the questionnaire was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha. Finally, construct validity was assessed using bivariate analysis between the total scores on the scale and theoretically relevant variables.

RESULTS

The results of exploratory factor analysis revealed a three-factor 14-item structure for the scale. Confirmatory factor analysis provided a good statistical and conceptual fit for the data. The analysis of the internal consistency of the scale was satisfactory (α = 0.798). Further, health literacy was significantly associated with participants' age, educational level, self-rated household income, smoking history, self-rated health, and self-rated health literacy.

CONCLUSIONS

The results we obtained indicate that this newly constructed health literacy tool is highly valid and reliable. Prospective studies are required to evaluate the predictive validity of the scale with regard to health outcomes.

摘要

目的

已开发出多种量表来评估健康素养。这些量表在发达国家的临床人群中已得到广泛开发。我们的研究描述了健康素养问卷的开发和验证过程,以测量伊朗普通人群的健康素养。

方法

我们遵循了施瓦布在1980年概述的量表开发过程。在对关于努特贝姆对健康素养的定义及其测量方法的研究进行全面综述之后,我们组织了两个焦点小组来生成一系列项目。然后,我们评估了这些项目的表面效度和内容效度。问卷的最终版本接受了独立的探索性和验证性因素分析。使用克朗巴赫α系数评估问卷的内部一致性。最后,通过对量表总分与理论相关变量之间进行双变量分析来评估结构效度。

结果

探索性因素分析的结果显示该量表具有一个包含14个项目的三因素结构。验证性因素分析为数据提供了良好的统计和概念拟合。量表内部一致性分析结果令人满意(α = 0.798)。此外,健康素养与参与者的年龄、教育水平、自评家庭收入、吸烟史、自评健康状况和自评健康素养显著相关。

结论

我们获得的结果表明,这个新构建的健康素养工具具有很高的效度和信度。需要进行前瞻性研究来评估该量表在健康结果方面的预测效度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4718/7066379/43ae45d86686/OMJ-35-02-1900041-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4718/7066379/f465b7936d07/OMJ-35-02-1900041-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4718/7066379/43ae45d86686/OMJ-35-02-1900041-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4718/7066379/f465b7936d07/OMJ-35-02-1900041-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4718/7066379/43ae45d86686/OMJ-35-02-1900041-f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing and Validating the Functional, Communicative, and Critical Health Literacy Questionnaire among the Iranian General Population.在伊朗普通人群中开发和验证功能性、沟通性及批判性健康素养问卷。
Oman Med J. 2020 Mar 12;35(2):e106. doi: 10.5001/omj.2020.24. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
Development and validation of a comprehensive health literacy tool for adults in Hong Kong.开发和验证香港成年人综合健康素养工具。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 10;10:1043197. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1043197. eCollection 2022.
3
Developing and validating a scale to measure Food and Nutrition Literacy (FNLIT) in elementary school children in Iran.开发并验证一个用于测量伊朗小学生食品与营养素养(FNLIT)的量表。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 27;12(6):e0179196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179196. eCollection 2017.
4
A new comprehensive diabetes health literacy scale: Development and psychometric evaluation.一个新的综合性糖尿病健康素养量表:编制与心理测量学评估。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Dec;88:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
5
Development and validation of a short and easy-to-use instrument for measuring health literacy: the Health Literacy Instrument for Adults (HELIA).开发和验证一种简短易用的成人健康素养测量工具:成人健康素养量表(HELIA)。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 12;20(1):656. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08787-2.
6
Design and Validation of a Health Literacy Assessment Tool for COVID-19 Among Iranian Workers.中文译文:伊朗劳动者 COVID-19 健康素养评估工具的设计与验证。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2024 Apr;8(2):e62-e68. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20240321-01. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
7
Development and validation of a multidimensional health literacy questionnaire for multiple sclerosis patients.开发和验证用于多发性硬化症患者的多维健康素养问卷。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 Oct;25:156-162. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.07.018. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
8
A modified version of the mental health literacy scale (MHLS) in Iranian people.伊朗人心理健康素养量表(MHLS)的修订版。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 23;21(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03050-3.
9
Measuring Electronic Health Literacy: Development, Validation, and Test of Measurement Invariance of a Revised German Version of the eHealth Literacy Scale.测量电子健康素养:电子健康素养量表修订版的德国版本的开发、验证和测量不变性测试。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 2;24(2):e28252. doi: 10.2196/28252.
10
Validation of the Persian version of the mental health literacy scale in Iran.验证心理健康素养量表的波斯语版本在伊朗的适用性。
Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2022 Mar;14(1):e12447. doi: 10.1111/appy.12447. Epub 2021 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Conceptualisation of critical health literacy-insights from Western and East Asian perspectives: a scoping review.从西方和东亚视角看关键健康素养的概念化:一项范围综述
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 May 15;10(5):e018232. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018232.
2
Development and psychometric validation of a novel health literacy scale for family caregivers of preschool children.一种针对学龄前儿童家庭照顾者的新型健康素养量表的开发与心理测量学验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Mar 1;23(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02349-z.
3
A new health literacy scale for staff in preschool childcare institution: development and preliminary validation.

本文引用的文献

1
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.因子数量的碎石检验
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
2
Measuring health literacy in populations: illuminating the design and development process of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q).衡量人群的健康素养:解读欧洲健康素养调查问卷(HLS-EU-Q)的设计与开发过程。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Oct 10;13:948. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-948.
3
All Aspects of Health Literacy Scale (AAHLS): developing a tool to measure functional, communicative and critical health literacy in primary healthcare settings.
一种针对学前儿童保育机构工作人员的新健康素养量表:编制与初步验证
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 7;25(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21233-x.
健康素养全方位量表(AAHLS):开发一种用于测量初级医疗保健环境中功能性、交流性和批判式健康素养的工具。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Feb;90(2):247-53. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.10.019. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
4
Validation of the Dutch functional, communicative and critical health literacy scales.荷兰功能性、交际性和批判性健康素养量表的验证。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Oct;89(1):82-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.07.014. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
5
Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models.健康素养与公共卫生:系统综述及定义与模式的整合
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 25;12:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-80.
6
Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review.低健康素养与健康结局:一项更新的系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 19;155(2):97-107. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005.
7
Critical health literacy: a review and critical analysis.关键健康素养:综述与批判性分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jul;73(1):60-7. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.004. Epub 2011 May 12.
8
Critical appraisal of health literacy indices revealed variable underlying constructs, narrow content and psychometric weaknesses.健康素养指标的批判性评价揭示了不同的潜在结构、狭窄的内容和心理测量学上的弱点。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):366-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.005. Epub 2010 Jul 17.
9
Defining and measuring health literacy: what can we learn from literacy studies?定义和衡量健康素养:我们能从素养研究中学到什么?
Int J Public Health. 2009;54(5):303-5. doi: 10.1007/s00038-009-0050-x.
10
Health literacy revisited: what do we mean and why does it matter?重新审视健康素养:我们的意思是什么,为何它很重要?
Health Promot Int. 2009 Sep;24(3):285-96. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dap014. Epub 2009 Apr 16.