Riegas-Villalobos Aurora, Martínez-Morales Fernando, Tinoco-Valencia Raunel, Serrano-Carreón Leobardo, Bertrand Brandt, Trejo-Hernández María R
1Laboratorio de Biotecnología Ambiental, Centro de Investigación en Biotecnología, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Av. Universidad 1001, CP 62209 Cuernavaca, Morelos Mexico.
2Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Morelos Mexico.
3 Biotech. 2020 Apr;10(4):146. doi: 10.1007/s13205-020-2150-5. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
In this study, the exact contribution of fungal biomass and laccase in the removal of the Orange II dye from liquid culture was determined. Biomass and laccase were produced with three different carbon sources [bran flakes (BF), wheat bran (WB) and wheat flour (WF)]. The contribution of the biomass and the laccase enzyme in the removal of the Orange II dye was assessed as follows: (A) in vivo treatment with fungal biomass; in vivo treatment with fungal biomass and inhibited laccase (using 0.6 mM sodium azide); and (B) in vitro treatment with crude laccase. The results of fungal biomass production were similar for all the carbon sources evaluated, while laccase volumetric activities were different. The highest enzyme production was obtained with WB, followed by BF and WF. In the in vivo treatment with fungal biomass-laccase, dye removal was over 84% for all the carbon sources. Dye adsorption by fungal biomass varied from 1.5-2%, presenting enzymatic activities ranging from 62 to 163 U L. In the in vivo treatment with fungal biomass-inhibited laccase, the removal of the dye varied from 30 to 72%. In this case, the percentage of dye adsorption by fungal biomass was significantly increased and ranged from 18 to 53%. In the in vitro treatment with laccase, the removal ranged from 80 to 84%. The best treatment for dye removal involved the use of both fungal biomass and laccase. The carbon source for biomass and laccase production had an impact on dye removal.
在本研究中,确定了真菌生物量和漆酶在从液体培养物中去除橙II染料方面的确切贡献。使用三种不同的碳源[麸皮片(BF)、麦麸(WB)和小麦粉(WF)]生产生物量和漆酶。评估了生物量和漆酶在去除橙II染料方面的贡献,具体如下:(A)用真菌生物量进行体内处理;用真菌生物量和抑制的漆酶(使用0.6 mM叠氮化钠)进行体内处理;以及(B)用粗漆酶进行体外处理。对于所有评估的碳源,真菌生物量的产生结果相似,而漆酶的体积活性不同。使用WB获得的酶产量最高,其次是BF和WF。在用真菌生物量-漆酶进行体内处理时,所有碳源的染料去除率均超过84%。真菌生物量对染料的吸附率在1.5%-2%之间,酶活性范围为62至163 U/L。在用真菌生物量-抑制的漆酶进行体内处理时,染料去除率在30%至72%之间。在这种情况下,真菌生物量对染料的吸附百分比显著增加,范围为18%至53%。在用漆酶进行体外处理时,去除率在80%至84%之间。去除染料的最佳处理方法是同时使用真菌生物量和漆酶。用于生产生物量和漆酶的碳源对染料去除有影响。