Suppr超能文献

左乙拉西坦与苯妥英钠治疗已确立的癫痫持续状态:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Levetiracetam versus phenytoin for the treatment of established status epilepticus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Seizure. 2020 May;78:43-48. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Mar 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam and phenytoin for the treatment of established status epilepticus.

METHODS

In this systematic review, we searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases from their inception with no language restrictions until May 8, 2019 and updated on February 5, 2020, for randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam and phenytoin for the treatment of established status epilepticus. A Meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the risk ratio (RR) using random-effects models.

RESULTS

We identified 7 trials with a total of 1028 participants. Levetiracetam was not associated with an increased rate of clinical seizure cessation within 60 min compared with phenytoin (RR, 1.02; 95 %CI, 0.92-1.13; I = 3%; 60.0 % [309/515] vs 59.3 % [275/463];12 more events [95 % CI, -48 to 77] per 1000 participants; moderate-quality evidence). Results were similar in the subgroup analysis of adults and children. The sample size met the optimum size in trial sequential analysis. There were also no statistically significant effects on good functional outcome (RR, 1.05; 95 % CI, 0.90-1.23), admission to critical care (RR, 1.09; 95 % CI, 0.95-1.24), or all-cause mortality (RR, 1.09; 95 % CI, 0.55-2.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate-quality evidence suggested that levetiracetam was not significantly superior to phenytoin in seizure cessation in patients with established status epilepticus.

摘要

目的

比较左乙拉西坦和苯妥英治疗已确立的癫痫持续状态的疗效和安全性。

方法

在这项系统评价中,我们检索了 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库,检索时间均从建库开始,无语言限制,最后检索日期为 2019 年 5 月 8 日,并于 2020 年 2 月 5 日更新,以纳入比较左乙拉西坦和苯妥英治疗已确立的癫痫持续状态的疗效和安全性的随机对照试验。采用随机效应模型计算风险比(RR)进行 Meta 分析。

结果

我们确定了 7 项试验,共纳入 1028 名参与者。与苯妥英相比,左乙拉西坦在 60 分钟内临床癫痫发作停止率没有增加(RR,1.02;95%CI,0.92-1.13;I ² = 3%;60.0%[309/515] vs 59.3%[275/463];每 1000 名参与者多 12 例事件[95%CI,-48 至 77];中等质量证据)。在成人和儿童的亚组分析中,结果相似。试验序贯分析的样本量符合最佳大小。在良好的功能结局(RR,1.05;95%CI,0.90-1.23)、入住重症监护病房(RR,1.09;95%CI,0.95-1.24)或全因死亡率(RR,1.09;95%CI,0.55-2.16)方面也没有统计学意义的影响。

结论

中等质量证据表明,在已确立的癫痫持续状态患者中,左乙拉西坦在癫痫发作停止方面并不明显优于苯妥英。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验