Tai Kentaro, Kuramitsu Kaori, Kido Masahiro, Tanaka Motofumi, Komatsu Shohei, Awazu Masahide, Gon Hidetoshi, So Shinichi, Tsugawa Daisuke, Mukubo Hideyo, Terai Sachio, Yanagimoto Hiroaki, Toyama Hirochika, Ajiki Tetsuo, Fukumoto Takumi
Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe City, Hyogo, Japan.
Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe City, Hyogo, Japan.
Transplant Proc. 2020 Apr;52(3):910-919. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.01.020. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade, stratified from the ALBI score, may have prognostic value in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. We aim to evaluate the prognostic abilities of the ALBI score/grade among living-donor liver transplantation patients.
We retrospectively collected data of 81 patients who underwent living-donor liver transplant at Kobe University Hospital between June 2000 and October 2018. The efficacy of the ALBI score/grade as a prognostic factor was assessed and compared with that of the well-established Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score.
Multivariate analysis indicated that recipient age (P = .003), donor age (P = .003), ALBI score ≥ -1.28 (P = .002), and ALBI grade III (P = .004) were independently associated with post-transplant survival. A high MELD score was not associated with post-transplant survival in univariate or multivariate analyses. Although there was no significant difference in the overall survival rate relative to recipient and donor age, ALBI score/grade was significantly associated with the 1- and 5-year survival rates (P = .023, P = .005). ALBI scores specifically detected fatal complications of post-transplant graft dysfunction (P = .031) and infection (P = .020).
ALBI score/grade predicted patient survival more precisely than the MELD score did, suggesting that it is a more useful prognostic factor compared to the MELD score in living-donor liver transplantation cases.
从白蛋白-胆红素(ALBI)评分分层而来的ALBI分级,可能对肝细胞癌患者具有预后价值。我们旨在评估ALBI评分/分级在活体肝移植患者中的预后能力。
我们回顾性收集了2000年6月至2018年10月期间在神户大学医院接受活体肝移植的81例患者的数据。评估了ALBI评分/分级作为预后因素的有效性,并与成熟的终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分进行比较。
多因素分析表明,受者年龄(P = 0.003)、供者年龄(P = 0.003)、ALBI评分≥ -1.28(P = 0.002)和ALBI III级(P = 0.004)与移植后生存独立相关。在单因素或多因素分析中,高MELD评分与移植后生存无关。尽管相对于受者和供者年龄,总体生存率没有显著差异,但ALBI评分/分级与1年和5年生存率显著相关(P = 0.023,P = 0.005)。ALBI评分特别检测到移植后移植物功能障碍(P = 0.031)和感染(P = 0.020)的致命并发症。
ALBI评分/分级比MELD评分更精确地预测了患者生存,表明在活体肝移植病例中,与MELD评分相比,它是一个更有用的预后因素。