Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Hand Surg Am. 2020 Jun;45(6):488-494.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.01.005. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
In the future, it is expected that treatment of Dupuytren disease (DD) may shift toward control of early disease. Ultrasound might be an accurate method to measure the outcome of such treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of sonographic measurement of palmar nodules.
Fifty patients with nodules characteristic for early disease were assessed with ultrasound by 2 observers. Four different aspects of DD nodules were measured in the transversal and sagittal planes, width, depth, circumference, and area. The intra- and interobserver reliabilities were calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The standard error of measurement (SEM) and the smallest detectable change (SDC) were also calculated for each aspect.
The intraobserver reliability was good (ICC, 0.724 [0.562-0.833] to 0.886 [0.808-0.934]), except for width in the sagittal direction (ICC, 0.671 [0.484-0.799]). The interobserver reliability was moderate (ICC, 0.385 [0.126-0.596] to 0.757 [0.538-0.869]). The intraobserver ICCs of area were highest (transverse, 0.847 [0.744-0.893]; sagittal, 0.886 [0.808-0.934]). The SEM and SDC of area were 6.1 and 16.9 mm in the transverse and 8.0 and 22.2 mm in the sagittal plane.
The intraobserver reliability of sonographic assessment of DD nodules is good. The measurement of area is the most reliable and is, therefore, recommended for future studies. However, even single-observer measurements have a clear dispersion, and a change beyond 16.9 (61%) and 22.2 mm (79%) has to be observed in the transverse and sagittal planes, respectively, before it can be considered as regression or progression.
Repeated ultrasonographic measurements in DD should ideally be done by a single observer, using area of the nodule in the sagittal plane. Change beyond 16.9 (transverse) and 22.2 (sagittal) mm2 can be considered as a real change in nodule size.
未来,治疗掌腱膜挛缩症(DD)可能会转向早期疾病的控制。超声可能是一种准确的方法来测量这种治疗的结果。本研究的目的是评估超声测量掌部结节的可靠性。
50 名患有早期疾病结节特征的患者接受了 2 名观察者的超声评估。在横切面和矢状面测量 DD 结节的四个不同方面,宽度、深度、周长和面积。使用组内相关系数(ICC)计算观察者内和观察者间的可靠性。还为每个方面计算了测量标准误差(SEM)和最小可检测变化(SDC)。
观察者内的可靠性较好(ICC,0.724[0.562-0.833]至 0.886[0.808-0.934]),除了矢状面的宽度(ICC,0.671[0.484-0.799])。观察者间的可靠性为中度(ICC,0.385[0.126-0.596]至 0.757[0.538-0.869])。观察者内的面积 ICC 最高(横切面,0.847[0.744-0.893];矢状面,0.886[0.808-0.934])。横切面和矢状面的 SEM 和 SDC 分别为 6.1 和 16.9mm 和 8.0 和 22.2mm。
超声评估 DD 结节的观察者内可靠性良好。面积的测量是最可靠的,因此推荐用于未来的研究。然而,即使是单观察者测量也有明显的分散性,因此,在横切面和矢状面分别观察到 16.9(61%)和 22.2mm(79%)的变化后,才能被认为是退行性或进展性改变。
DD 的重复超声测量理想情况下应由单个观察者进行,使用矢状面结节的面积。结节大小的变化超过 16.9(横切面)和 22.2(矢状面)mm2 可被认为是真正的结节大小变化。