Holland Bone & Joint Program (Lake, Widdifield), Sunnybrook Research Institute; ICES (Yao, Hawker, Widdifield); Women's College Hospital (Gakhal, Hawker); Sinai Health System (Steiman) and Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation (Hawker, Widdifield), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
CMAJ Open. 2020 Mar 16;8(1):E184-E190. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20190148. Print 2020 Jan-Mar.
Repeat antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing may be unnecessary, potentially harmful and costly. Our aim was to assess the frequency and correlates of repeat ANA testing in Ontario.
We performed a retrospective descriptive study identifying ANA tests performed over 2008-2015 among adults within the Ontario Laboratories Information System. Our primary outcome was any ANA test performed within 1 year of a previous ANA test. Our secondary outcome was any repeat test after a previous positive result. Repeat testing overall (regardless of who performed the previous test) and repeat testing by the same provider who performed the previous test were determined separately. We assessed correlates of repeat testing (e.g., patient and physician characteristics) and of repeat testing after a positive result using separate logistic regression models by means of generalized estimating equations to account for clustering of repeat testing within patients and within physician practices.
In total, 587 357 ANA tests were performed in 437 966 patients over the study period, of which 126 322 (21.5%) gave a positive result and 164 913 (28.1%) were repeat tests. Family physicians ordered 358 422 tests (61.0%), and rheumatologists ordered 65 071 tests (11.1%). Of the repeat tests, 82 332 (49.9%) were ordered within 12 months of the previous test. Among the 73 961 repeat tests ordered by the same practitioner within 12 months, the previous test result was positive for 22 657 (30.6%). A higher proportion of rheumatologists than other physicians ordered repeat tests within 12 months (36.1% v. 11.3%). The most significant correlate of potentially redundant testing was testing among patients with suspected or confirmed connective tissue disease.
Over a quarter of ANA tests in Ontario were repeat tests; rheumatologists were most likely to order repeat testing. Our findings may be useful to inform quality-improvement initiatives related to the appropriateness of ANA testing.
重复抗核抗体(ANA)检测可能是不必要的,潜在有害且昂贵的。我们的目的是评估安大略省重复 ANA 检测的频率和相关性。
我们进行了一项回顾性描述性研究,在安大略省实验室信息系统中确定了 2008 年至 2015 年间成年人进行的 ANA 检测。我们的主要结局是在之前的 ANA 检测后 1 年内进行的任何 ANA 检测。我们的次要结局是在前一个阳性结果后进行的任何重复检测。总体而言(无论之前的检测由谁进行)和由进行之前检测的同一提供者进行的重复检测分别确定。我们使用广义估计方程通过单独的逻辑回归模型评估重复检测(例如,患者和医生特征)和阳性结果后的重复检测,以考虑患者和医生实践中重复检测的聚类。
在研究期间,共有 587357 项 ANA 检测在 437966 名患者中进行,其中 126322 项(21.5%)结果阳性,164913 项(28.1%)为重复检测。家庭医生开具了 358422 项检测(61.0%),风湿病学家开具了 65071 项检测(11.1%)。在重复检测中,82332 项(49.9%)是在前一项检测后 12 个月内进行的。在 12 个月内由同一医生开具的 73961 项重复检测中,前一项检测结果为阳性的有 22657 项(30.6%)。与其他医生相比,风湿病学家更有可能在 12 个月内开具重复检测(36.1%比 11.3%)。潜在冗余检测的最重要相关性是疑似或确诊结缔组织疾病患者的检测。
安大略省超过四分之一的 ANA 检测是重复检测;风湿病学家最有可能进行重复检测。我们的发现可能有助于为与 ANA 检测的适当性相关的质量改进计划提供信息。