Universidad del Desarrollo, Facultad de Gobierno, CICS, Av. Plaza 680, San Carlos de Apoquindo, Las Condes, Santiago de Chile, 7610658, Chile.
University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3UD, United Kingdom.
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 17;10(1):4859. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61330-6.
Although friendship as a social behaviour is an evolved trait that shares many similarities with kinship, there is a key difference: to choose friends, one must select few from many. Homophily, i.e., a similarity-based friendship choice heuristic, has been shown to be the main factor in selecting friends. Its function has been associated with the efficiency of collective action via synchronised mental states. Recent empirical results question the general validity of this explanation. Here I offer an alternative hypothesis: similarity-based friendship choice is an individual-level adaptive response to falling clustering coefficient of the social network typical during urbanisation, falling fertility, increased migration. The mathematical model shows how homophily as a friend-choice heuristic affects the network structure: (1) homophilic friendship choice increases the clustering coefficient; (2) network proximity-based and similarity-based friendship choices have additive effects on the clustering coefficient; and (3) societies that face falling fertility, urbanisation, and migration, are likely go through a u-shaped transition period in terms of clustering coefficient. These findings suggest that social identity can be seen as an emergent phenomenon and is the consequence, rather than the driver of, homophilic social dynamics, and offer an alternative explanation for the rise of "fake news" as a societal phenomenon.
虽然友谊作为一种社会行为是一种与亲属关系有许多相似之处的进化特征,但它也有一个关键的区别:选择朋友时,必须从众多人中选出少数几个。同质性,即基于相似性的友谊选择启发式,已被证明是选择朋友的主要因素。它的功能与通过同步心理状态提高集体行动的效率有关。最近的实证结果质疑了这一解释的普遍有效性。在这里,我提出了一个替代假设:基于相似性的友谊选择是个体层面上对城市化、生育率下降、移民增加导致的社交网络聚类系数下降的适应性反应。该数学模型展示了作为朋友选择启发式的同质性如何影响网络结构:(1)同质性友谊选择增加聚类系数;(2)基于网络接近度和基于相似性的友谊选择对聚类系数有相加效应;(3)面临生育率下降、城市化和移民的社会可能会经历聚类系数的 U 型过渡阶段。这些发现表明,社会认同可以被视为一种涌现现象,是同质性社会动态的结果,而不是原因,并为“假新闻”作为一种社会现象的出现提供了另一种解释。