• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Trivial or Troublesome: Experience with Coronary Heart Disease Medication from the Patient's Perspective.微不足道还是麻烦重重:从患者角度看冠心病药物治疗的体验
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Feb 27;14:411-424. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S230120. eCollection 2020.
2
Dealing with being prescribed cardiovascular preventive medication: a narrative analysis of qualitative interviews with patients with recent acute coronary heart disease in Sweden.处理被开具心血管预防药物的问题:对瑞典近期急性冠心病患者进行定性访谈的叙述分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 17;11(12):e056677. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056677.
3
Factors affecting patients' knowledge about dispensed medicines: A Qualitative study of healthcare professionals and patients in Pakistan.影响患者对配药知识了解的因素:巴基斯坦医护专业人员和患者的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 1;13(6):e0197482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197482. eCollection 2018.
4
"It's so hard taking pills when you don't know what they're for": a qualitative study of patients' medicine taking behaviours and conceptualisation of medicines in the context of rheumatoid arthritis.“当你不知道药的用途时,吃药太难了”:一项关于类风湿关节炎患者用药行为及对药物认知的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr 26;17(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2246-8.
5
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
6
Exploring Transplant Medication-Taking Behaviours in Older Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Qualitative Study of Semi-Structured Interviews.探索老年肾移植受者的移植药物服用行为:半结构化访谈的定性研究。
Drugs Aging. 2022 Nov;39(11):887-898. doi: 10.1007/s40266-022-00975-6. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
7
Patients' perceptions of depression and coronary heart disease: a qualitative UPBEAT-UK study.患者对抑郁和冠心病的认知:一项 UPBEAT-UK 的定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Mar 19;14:38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-38.
8
Patients' Experiences and Perspectives of Receiving Written Medicine Information About Medicines: A Qualitative Study.患者对接收药品书面信息的体验与看法:一项定性研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Mar 9;15:569-580. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S298563. eCollection 2021.
9
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
10
Medicine taking behaviours of people with type 2 diabetes in Indonesia: a qualitative study.印度尼西亚2型糖尿病患者的服药行为:一项定性研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2020 Feb;42(1):31-39. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00933-0. Epub 2019 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
What Are the Drug-Related Problems Still Faced by Patients in Daily Life?-A Qualitative Analysis at the Pharmacy Counter.患者在日常生活中仍面临哪些与药物相关的问题?——药房柜台的定性分析
Pharmacy (Basel). 2023 Aug 3;11(4):124. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy11040124.
2
Effects of a pharmaceutical care intervention on clinical outcomes and patient adherence in coronary heart disease: the MIMeRiC randomized controlled trial.药物治疗管理干预对冠心病临床结局和患者依从性的影响:MIMeRiC 随机对照试验。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Aug 1;21(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02178-0.
3
The Medication Experience: A Concept Analysis.用药体验:一项概念分析
Pharmacy (Basel). 2020 Dec 31;9(1):7. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9010007.

本文引用的文献

1
Challenges adhering to a medication regimen following first-time percutaneous coronary intervention: A patient perspective.初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后坚持药物治疗方案的挑战:患者视角。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Dec;88:16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
2
Motivational Interviewing and Medication Review in Coronary Heart Disease (MIMeRiC): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating Effects on Clinical Outcomes, Adherence, and Quality of Life.冠心病中的动机性访谈与药物评估(MIMeRiC):一项关于临床结局、依从性和生活质量影响的随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Feb 20;7(2):e57. doi: 10.2196/resprot.8659.
3
The impact of cardiovascular medication use on patients' daily lives: a cross-sectional study.心血管药物使用对患者日常生活的影响:一项横断面研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Apr;40(2):412-420. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0601-4. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
4
Motivational Interviewing and Medication Review in Coronary Heart Disease (MIMeRiC): Intervention Development and Protocol for the Process Evaluation.冠心病中的动机性访谈与药物评估(MIMeRiC):干预措施开发及过程评估方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Jan 30;7(1):e21. doi: 10.2196/resprot.8660.
5
Effects of person-centred care after an event of acute coronary syndrome: Two-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.急性冠状动脉综合征事件后以人为本的护理效果:一项随机对照试验的两年随访。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Dec 15;249:42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.08.069. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
6
Trends in the epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in the UK.英国心血管疾病流行病学趋势
Heart. 2016 Dec 15;102(24):1945-1952. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309573. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
7
2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR).2016年欧洲临床实践心血管疾病预防指南:欧洲心脏病学会和其他学会关于临床实践心血管疾病预防的第六联合工作组(由10个学会的代表和特邀专家组成)由欧洲心血管预防与康复协会(EACPR)特别贡献制定。
Eur Heart J. 2016 Aug 1;37(29):2315-2381. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw106. Epub 2016 May 23.
8
Change in Medication Adherence and Beliefs in Medicines Over Time in Older Adults.老年人用药依从性及对药物信念随时间的变化
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Sep 1;8(5):39-47. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n5p39.
9
The necessity-concerns framework predicts adherence to medication in multiple illness conditions: A meta-analysis.必要性-关注框架预测多种疾病状况下的药物依从性:一项荟萃分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 May;99(5):706-17. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.11.004. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
10
Patients' beliefs and attitudes about their treatment for inflammatory bowel disease in Korea.韩国患者对炎症性肠病治疗的信念和态度。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Mar;31(3):575-80. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13155.

微不足道还是麻烦重重:从患者角度看冠心病药物治疗的体验

Trivial or Troublesome: Experience with Coronary Heart Disease Medication from the Patient's Perspective.

作者信息

Östbring Malin Johansson, Hellström Lina, Mårtensson Jan

机构信息

Pharmaceutical Department Region Kalmar County, Kalmar, Sweden.

eHealth Institute, Department of Medicine and Optometry, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Feb 27;14:411-424. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S230120. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.2147/PPA.S230120
PMID:32184571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7053281/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Living with coronary heart disease (CHD) usually means being prescribed several medications to help prevent new cardiac events. Using medicines for long-term conditions impacts on day-to-day life, and coping with medicines can be burdensome and can affect the quality of life. To enable better support of these patients, we need to understand their collective medicine-related experience.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to describe patients' medicine-related experience 1 year after the diagnosis of CHD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A qualitative, descriptive study using semi-structured interviews was conducted in 19 patients in their homes or at Linnaeus University, Sweden. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative content analysis with an inductive approach was used.

RESULTS

Patients' experiences with using their medicines after diagnosis of CHD differed considerably. Some patients found handling the medicines and administering their treatment very easy, natural and straightforward, while others found that it was distressing or troublesome, and influenced their lives extensively. There was a varied sense of personal responsibility about the treatment and use of medicines. The patients' experiences were classified into one of seven categories: a sense of security, unproblematic, learning to live with it, taking responsibility for it, somewhat uncertain, troublesome, or distressing. Participants in the study who expressed an unproblematic view of medicine taking also often revealed that they had dilemmas or uncertainties.

CONCLUSION

Patients' medicine-related experiences after CHD vary greatly. The findings of this study highlight a need for more individualized support for patients using medicines for secondary prevention. The patients often needed better dialogue with healthcare providers to optimally manage their medicines. Medicine-related support for these patients should encompass various aspects of medicine-taking.

摘要

背景

患有冠心病(CHD)通常意味着需要服用多种药物来预防新的心脏事件。长期使用药物会影响日常生活,应对药物治疗可能会很繁琐,并会影响生活质量。为了能更好地支持这些患者,我们需要了解他们与药物相关的总体经历。

目的

本研究的目的是描述冠心病诊断后1年患者与药物相关的经历。

患者与方法

采用半结构式访谈进行了一项定性描述性研究,研究对象为瑞典林奈大学或其家中的19名患者。访谈进行了录音并逐字转录。采用归纳法进行定性内容分析。

结果

冠心病诊断后患者使用药物的经历差异很大。一些患者觉得处理药物和进行治疗非常容易、自然且直接,而另一些患者则觉得这令人痛苦或麻烦,并对他们的生活产生了广泛影响。患者对治疗和药物使用的个人责任感各不相同。患者的经历被分为七类之一:安全感、没问题、学会适应、承担责任、有些不确定、麻烦或痛苦。研究中对服药持没问题看法的参与者也常常表示他们存在困境或不确定性。

结论

冠心病患者与药物相关的经历差异很大。本研究结果凸显了对使用药物进行二级预防的患者需要提供更个性化支持的必要性。患者通常需要与医疗服务提供者进行更好的沟通,以优化药物管理。对这些患者的药物相关支持应涵盖服药的各个方面。