Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Marshall B. Ketchum University, Fullerton, CA, United States.
Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Marshall B. Ketchum University, Fullerton, CA, United States.
Front Immunol. 2020 Feb 28;11:351. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00351. eCollection 2020.
Just-In-Time Teaching (JiTT) active learning pedagogy is utilized by various disciplines, but its value in a professional pharmacy curriculum has not yet been demonstrated. The purpose of our research study is to implement and evaluate JiTT in a Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) program. The impetus in implementing JiTT into a PharmD curriculum was to provide students with an out-of-classroom learning opportunity to enhance knowledge-based skills. The current study summarizes the implementation of JiTT in four distinct instances: two iterations of the required courses "Integrated Microbiology and Virology" (Fall 2016 and Fall 2017) and "Integrated Immunology" (Winter 2016-2017 and Winter 2017-2018). JiTT included knowledge-based questions in multiple-choice format, integrated case studies, and student responses prior to the actual lecture session. After the conclusion of each course, students were asked to provide feedback on the utilization of JiTT by way of an anonymous survey. Following the Fall 2016 iteration of the Microbiology & Virology course, students found the integrated case studies to be beneficial (mean = 3.27 out of a maximum of 4, = 0.62), and their overall endorsement of JiTT was high (mean = 3.61 out of 4, = 0.50). For the other three courses included in this study, the primary dependent variable was the student's average rating of JiTT, rated on a five-point scale. Aggregating the scores from the Fall 2017 iteration of the Integrated Microbiology & Virology course and both instances of the Immunology course, students rated JiTT very favorably (mean = 4.17 out of a maximum of 5, = 0.77). Students' performances in JiTT-based courses were compared against non-JiTT-based courses. Analysis of assessment data for student's performance on knowledge-based questions showed JiTT was helpful for student learning and JiTT-based courses had more consistent exam scores compared to non-JiTT-based courses. The current results are a promising initial step in validating the usefulness of JiTT in a pharmacy program and lays the foundation for future studies aimed at a direct comparison between a traditional lecture style and JiTT pedagogy implemented into PharmD curricula.
及时教学(JiTT)主动学习教学法被各种学科所采用,但它在专业药学课程中的价值尚未得到证明。我们的研究目的是在药学博士(PharmD)课程中实施和评估 JiTT。在 PharmD 课程中实施 JiTT 的动力是为学生提供课堂外学习机会,以增强基于知识的技能。本研究总结了 JiTT 在四个不同实例中的实施情况:两门必修课程“综合微生物学和病毒学”(2016 年秋季和 2017 年秋季)和“综合免疫学”(2016-2017 年冬季和 2017-2018 年冬季)的两个迭代。JiTT 包括多项选择题形式的基于知识的问题、综合案例研究以及实际讲座之前的学生回答。每门课程结束后,学生通过匿名调查就 JiTT 的使用情况提供反馈。在 2016 年秋季的微生物学和病毒学课程迭代之后,学生发现综合案例研究是有益的(最高分为 4,平均值为 3.27, = 0.62),他们对 JiTT 的总体认可程度很高(最高分为 4,平均值为 3.61, = 0.50)。对于本研究中包含的其他三门课程,主要的因变量是学生对 JiTT 的平均评价,评价标准为五分制。综合 2017 年秋季的综合微生物学和病毒学课程迭代以及免疫学课程的两个实例的分数,学生对 JiTT 的评价非常高(最高分为 5,平均值为 4.17, = 0.77)。将基于 JiTT 的课程的学生表现与非基于 JiTT 的课程进行比较。对学生基于知识问题的表现进行评估分析表明,JiTT 对学生学习有帮助,基于 JiTT 的课程的考试成绩比非基于 JiTT 的课程更一致。目前的结果是验证 JiTT 在药学课程中的有用性的一个有希望的初步步骤,并为未来的研究奠定了基础,这些研究旨在直接比较传统的讲座式教学法和 JiTT 教学法在 PharmD 课程中的应用。