Zoriah Aziz, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603,Malaysia.
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603,Malaysia.
J Tradit Chin Med. 2019 Feb;39(1):1-14.
To evaluate current evidence on the efficacy and safety of Cordyceps sinensis (cordyceps) or its fermented products used as an adjunctive treatment in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.
The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, MEDLINE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang Database were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials up to March 2016. Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion, extracted data, assessed the methodological quality and rated the quality of evidence with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.
Twelve studies involving 655 participants were included. Evidence of low to moderate-quality showed that cordyceps plus conventional treatment compared to conventional treatment alone significantly improved C-reactive protein [standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.61; 95% confidence intervals (CI) -1.00 to -0.22], high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [weighted mean difference (WMD) -3.44 mg/L; 95% CI -3.89 to -2.99], serum albumin (WMD 3.07 g/L; 95% CI 1.59 to 4.55), malondialdehyde (WMD -1.95 nmol/L; 95% CI -2.24 to -1.66), and hemoglobin (WMD 9.56 g/L; 95% CI 3.65 to 15.47) levels. However, there was no significant improvement for serum creatinine and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Overall, most trials either did not monitor adverse events or poorly documented them.
Given the small number of trials included, the unclear methodological quality of the included trials, and the high heterogeneity in pooled analyses, the evidence obtained in this review is insufficient to recommend the use of cordyceps as adjunctive treatment in hemodialysis patients.
评估冬虫夏草(虫草)或其发酵产品作为辅助治疗用于维持性血液透析患者的疗效和安全性的现有证据。
检索 Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库(CENTRAL)、EMBASE、MEDLINE、中国知网(CNKI)和万方数据库,查找截至 2016 年 3 月的相关随机对照试验。两位综述作者独立筛选试验纳入、提取数据、评估方法学质量,并采用推荐分级的评估、制定与评价方法评估证据质量。
纳入 12 项研究,共 655 名参与者。证据质量为低到中等,表明虫草加常规治疗与单纯常规治疗相比,显著改善 C 反应蛋白[标准化均数差(SMD) -0.61;95%置信区间(CI) -1.00 至-0.22]、高敏 C 反应蛋白[加权均数差(WMD) -3.44 mg/L;95% CI -3.89 至-2.99]、血清白蛋白(WMD 3.07 g/L;95% CI 1.59 至 4.55)、丙二醛(WMD -1.95 nmol/L;95% CI -2.24 至-1.66)和血红蛋白(WMD 9.56 g/L;95% CI 3.65 至 15.47)水平。然而,血清肌酐和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇没有显著改善。总体而言,大多数试验要么没有监测不良事件,要么没有很好地记录。
鉴于纳入的试验数量较少,纳入试验的方法学质量不明确,以及汇总分析中的高度异质性,本综述获得的证据不足以推荐虫草作为血液透析患者的辅助治疗。