Effects and safety of preparation in the adjuvant treatment for dialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

(), a genus of ascomycete fungi, has been widedly used in China as a dietary supplement or natural remedy and intensively studied in various disease models with its immunomodulatory potentials. It is a rich source of various bioactive compounds and used for treating end-stage renal disease. This systematic review with clinical evidence aimed to highlight the efficacy and safety of as an adjuvant treatment for patients undergoing dialysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search through nine electronic databases up to 31 April 2024, was conducted for related studies. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to evaluate the quality of studies. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system was used to assess the certainty of evidence. Two researchers independently searched the literature and evaluated the risk of bias.

RESULTS

After the screening, 35 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2,914 patients were eventually included. The meta-analysis showed that using effectively reduced the following outcomes in patients undergoing dialysis: C-reactive protein (15RCTs, MD = -2.22, 95% CI -3.24 to -1.20; very low certainty evidence); creatinine (22RCTs, MD =1.33, 95% CI -1.79 to -0.87; very low certainty evidence); blood urea nitrogen (21RCTs, MD = -1.57, 95% CI -2.07 to -1.07; low certainty evidence);. It could also effectively improve the following outcomes in patients undergoing dialysis: albumin (20RCTs, MD = -0.81, 95% CI -1.21 to -0.41; low certainty evidence); hemoglobin (19RCTs, MD = -1.00, 95% CI -1.43 to -0.57; low certainty evidence). The rate of adverse drug reactions was higher in the control group than in the experimental group (4RCTs, MD = 1.81, 95% CI 0.88-3.74).

CONCLUSION

The current evidence indicates that patients with dialysis receiving in the adjuvant treatment may improve nutritional and micro-inflammatory status and renal function for both hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. However, some limitation affected the generalizability of our findings. High-quality studies evaluating mortality outcomes of patients with different dialytic modalities in CKD are warranted in future.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022324508, registration number CRD42022324508.