Suppr超能文献

十年之后:对平价医疗法案最糟糕情况的反思。

Ten Years Later: Reflections on Critics' Worst-Case Scenarios for the Affordable Care Act.

机构信息

Urban Institute.

出版信息

J Health Polit Policy Law. 2020 Aug 1;45(4):465-483. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8255421.

Abstract

The primary goals of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) were to increase the availability and affordability of health insurance coverage and thereby improve access to needed health care services. Numerous studies have overwhelmingly confirmed that the law has reduced uninsurance and improved affordability of coverage and care for millions of Americans. Not everyone believed that the ACA would lead to positive outcomes, however. Critics raised numerous concerns in the years leading up to the law's passage and full implementation, including about its consequences for national health spending, labor supply, employer health insurance markets, provider capacity, and overall population health. This article considers five frequently heard worst-case scenarios related to the ACA and provides research evidence that these fears did not come to pass.

摘要

平价医疗法案(ACA)的主要目标是增加医疗保险覆盖范围的可及性和负担能力,从而改善获得必要医疗服务的机会。大量研究都证实,该法律已经减少了数百万人的无保险现象,提高了保险覆盖范围和医疗服务的可负担性。然而,并非所有人都认为 ACA 会带来积极的结果。在该法律通过和全面实施之前的几年里,批评者提出了许多担忧,包括对国家卫生支出、劳动力供应、雇主健康保险市场、供应能力和整体人口健康的影响。本文考虑了与 ACA 相关的五个常见的最坏情况,并提供了研究证据,证明这些担忧并未成为现实。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验