Suppr超能文献

是时候加大力度了。为何医疗保健领域的安全调查应更多地借鉴安全科学。

It's time to step it up. Why safety investigations in healthcare should look more to safety science.

作者信息

Wiig Siri, Braithwaite Jeffrey, Clay-Williams Robyn

机构信息

SHARE-Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, University of Stavanger, Kjell Arholms gate 41, 4036 Stavanger, Norway.

Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Balaclava Rd, 2109 Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 Jun 4;32(4):281-284. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa013.

Abstract

Accident models and theoretical foundations underpinning safety investigations are key to understanding how investigators construct causality and make recommendations. Safety science has devoted large efforts to investigating and theorizing about accidents. Why doesn't healthcare pay more interest to these theories when investigating healthcare accidents? We use established accident theories to suggest how these can support safety investigations in healthcare and provide new lenses to investigatory bodies. We reflect on examples from research and practice in healthcare systems and other high-risk industries. Investigation processes and reports serve multiple purposes. We argue there is an untapped improvement potential for healthcare safety investigations and suggest new ways of integrating different accident theoretical reflections with investigatory practice.

摘要

支撑安全调查的事故模型和理论基础是理解调查人员如何构建因果关系并提出建议的关键。安全科学在事故调查和理论化方面投入了大量精力。为什么医疗保健行业在调查医疗事故时对这些理论没有给予更多关注呢?我们运用已有的事故理论来探讨其如何支持医疗保健领域的安全调查,并为调查机构提供新的视角。我们思考了医疗系统和其他高风险行业的研究与实践中的例子。调查过程和报告具有多种目的。我们认为医疗安全调查存在尚未挖掘的改进潜力,并提出将不同事故理论思考与调查实践相结合的新方法。

相似文献

5
Strategies for dealing with resistance to recommendations from accident investigations.应对事故调查建议阻力的策略。
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Mar;45:455-67. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.08.014. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
8
DEEP SCOPE: A Framework for Safe Healthcare Design.深景:安全医疗保健设计框架。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 22;18(15):7780. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157780.

引用本文的文献

4
DEEP SCOPE: A Framework for Safe Healthcare Design.深景:安全医疗保健设计框架。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 22;18(15):7780. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157780.
5
Systems-based models for investigating patient safety incidents.用于调查患者安全事件的基于系统的模型。
BJA Educ. 2021 Aug;21(8):307-313. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2021.03.004. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
7
The patient died: What about involvement in the investigation process?患者死亡:参与调查过程如何?
Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 Jun 17;32(5):342-346. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa034.

本文引用的文献

3
Root-cause analysis: swatting at mosquitoes versus draining the swamp.根本原因分析:拍打蚊子与排干沼泽
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 May;26(5):350-353. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006229. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
5
The problem with root cause analysis.根本原因分析的问题。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 May;26(5):417-422. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005511. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
6
Resilient health care: turning patient safety on its head.韧性医疗保健:彻底转变患者安全理念。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2015 Oct;27(5):418-20. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv063. Epub 2015 Aug 20.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验