• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Safety analysis over time: seven major changes to adverse event investigation.随着时间的推移进行安全性分析:不良事件调查的 7 大变化。
Implement Sci. 2017 Dec 28;12(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0695-4.
2
Incident reporting in one UK accident and emergency department.英国一家急诊科的事件报告。
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006 Jan;14(1):27-37. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2005.10.001.
3
Can Patient Safety Incident Reports Be Used to Compare Hospital Safety? Results from a Quantitative Analysis of the English National Reporting and Learning System Data.患者安全事件报告能否用于比较医院安全性?对英国国家报告与学习系统数据的定量分析结果
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 9;10(12):e0144107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144107. eCollection 2015.
4
Critical incident monitoring in anaesthesia.麻醉中的危急事件监测
Med J Malaysia. 2006 Dec;61(5):577-85.
5
6
Applied Use of Safety Event Occurrence Control Charts of Harm and Non-Harm Events: A Case Study.伤害与非伤害事件安全事件发生控制图的应用:一项案例研究。
Am J Med Qual. 2017 May/Jun;32(3):285-291. doi: 10.1177/1062860616646197. Epub 2016 May 9.
7
Best practices in incident investigation in the chemical process industries with examples from the industry sector and specifically from Nova Chemicals.化工行业事故调查的最佳实践,并列举行业领域特别是诺瓦化学公司的实例。
J Hazard Mater. 2004 Jul 26;111(1-3):161-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.02.051.
8
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
9
Critical incident monitoring in paediatric and adult critical care: from reporting to improved patient outcomes?儿科和成人重症监护中的关键事件监测:从报告到改善患者结局?
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2010 Dec;16(6):649-53. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32834044d8.
10
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions and Experiences of Consumer Representatives on Patient Safety Investigation Teams: A Qualitative Analysis.消费者代表对患者安全调查团队的认知与体验:一项定性分析
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70281. doi: 10.1111/hex.70281.
2
Reconciling Safety and Safeguarding in Health and Social Care: Implications for Just Culture.协调健康与社会护理中的安全保障:对公正文化的影响。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 21;13(7):690. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13070690.
3
Requirements for effective investigation and learning after suicide: the views of persons with lived experience and professionals.自杀后有效调查与学习的要求:有实际经历者和专业人士的观点
Front Health Serv. 2025 Feb 25;5:1519124. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1519124. eCollection 2025.
4
Systems analysis of clinical incidents: development of a new edition of the London Protocol.临床事件的系统分析:新版《伦敦协议》的制定
BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 May 19;34(6):413-420. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017987.
5
'They Take the Mum Off You When You Come In': An Ethnographic Study of Parent Experiences of Medicines Safety Systems in English Hospitals.“你入院时他们就把你妈妈带走了”:一项关于英国医院药品安全系统中家长经历的人种志研究
Health Expect. 2025 Feb;28(1):e70161. doi: 10.1111/hex.70161.
6
Humanising processes after harm part 2: compounded harm experienced by patients and their families after safety incidents.伤害后的人性化进程 第2部分:安全事件后患者及其家属遭受的复合伤害
Front Health Serv. 2024 Dec 17;4:1473296. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1473296. eCollection 2024.
7
Improving health system responses when patients are harmed: a protocol for a multistage mixed-methods study.改善患者受到伤害时的卫生系统应对措施:一项多阶段混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 5;14(7):e085854. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085854.
8
Clinical Informatics Team Members' Perspectives on Health Information Technology Safety After Experiential Learning and Safety Process Development: Qualitative Descriptive Study.临床信息学团队成员对体验式学习和安全流程开发后健康信息技术安全的看法:定性描述性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Feb 5;8:e53302. doi: 10.2196/53302.
9
The process and perspective of serious incident investigations in adult community mental health services: integrative review and synthesis.成人社区心理健康服务中严重事件调查的过程与视角:综合综述与分析
BJPsych Bull. 2024 Jan 4;49(1):1-13. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2023.98.
10
Characterization of Safety Events Involving Technology in Primary and Community Care.技术在初级和社区保健中引发的安全事件的特征描述。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Oct;14(5):1008-1017. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1777454. Epub 2023 Dec 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Root-cause analysis: swatting at mosquitoes versus draining the swamp.根本原因分析:拍打蚊子与排干沼泽
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 May;26(5):350-353. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006229. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
2
Association between continuity of care in general practice and hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: cross sectional study of routinely collected, person level data.一般实践中的连续性护理与因门诊护理敏感情况而住院的关联:基于常规收集的个人层面数据的横断面研究。
BMJ. 2017 Feb 1;356:j84. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j84.
3
Patient Safety Incidents Involving Sick Children in Primary Care in England and Wales: A Mixed Methods Analysis.英格兰和威尔士初级医疗中涉及患病儿童的患者安全事件:一项混合方法分析
PLoS Med. 2017 Jan 17;14(1):e1002217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002217. eCollection 2017 Jan.
4
Our current approach to root cause analysis: is it contributing to our failure to improve patient safety?我们当前的根本原因分析方法:它是否导致了我们在改善患者安全方面的失败?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 May;26(5):381-387. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005991. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
5
Multicentre observational study of surgical system failures in aortic procedures and their effect on patient outcomes.多中心观察性研究主动脉手术中手术系统故障及其对患者结局的影响。
Br J Surg. 2016 Oct;103(11):1467-75. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10275. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
6
The problem with root cause analysis.根本原因分析的问题。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 May;26(5):417-422. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005511. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
7
Learning from incidents in healthcare: the journey, not the arrival, matters.从医疗保健事件中学习:过程很重要,而非结果。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Mar;26(3):252-256. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004853. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
8
Re-examining high reliability: actively organising for safety.重新审视高可靠性:积极组织以确保安全。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Mar;26(3):248-251. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004698. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
9
Patients' views of adverse events in primary and ambulatory care: a systematic review to assess methods and the content of what patients consider to be adverse events.患者对基层医疗和门诊医疗中不良事件的看法:一项评估方法及患者所认为不良事件内容的系统综述
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Jan 27;17:6. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0408-0.
10
A Tool for the Concise Analysis of Patient Safety Incidents.一种用于患者安全事件简明分析的工具。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2016 Jan;42(1):26-33. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(16)42003-9.

随着时间的推移进行安全性分析:不良事件调查的 7 大变化。

Safety analysis over time: seven major changes to adverse event investigation.

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, 15 Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, UK.

Jane Carthey Consulting, London, UK.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2017 Dec 28;12(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0695-4.

DOI:10.1186/s13012-017-0695-4
PMID:29282080
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5745912/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Every safety-critical industry devotes considerable time and resource to investigating and analysing accidents, incidents and near misses. The systematic analysis of incidents has greatly expanded our understanding of both the causes and prevention of harm. These methods have been widely employed in healthcare over the last 20 years but are now subject to critique and reassessment. In this paper, we reconsider the purpose and value of incident analysis and methods appropriate to the healthcare of today.

MAIN TEXT

The primary need for a revised vision of incident analysis is that healthcare itself is changing dramatically. People are living longer, often with multiple co-morbidities which are managed over very long timescales. Our vision of safety analysis needs to expand concomitantly to embrace much longer timescales. Rather than think only in terms of the prevention of specific incidents, we need to consider the balance of benefit, harm and risks over long time periods encompassing the social and psychological impact of healthcare as well as physical effects. We argued for major changes in our approach to the analysis of safety events: assume that patients and families will be partners in investigation and where possible engage them fully from the beginning, examine much longer time periods and assess contributory factors at different time points in the patient journey, be more proportionate and strategic in analysing safety issues, seek to understand success and recovery as well as failure, consider the workability of clinical processes as well as deviations from them and develop a much more structured and wide-ranging approach to recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Previous methods of incident analysis were simply adopted and disseminated with little research into the concepts, methods, reliability and outcomes of such analyses. There is a need for significant research and investment in the development of new methods. These changes are profound and will require major adjustments in both practical and cultural terms and research to explore and evaluate the most effective approaches.

摘要

背景

每个安全关键行业都投入了大量的时间和资源来调查和分析事故、事件和未遂事件。对事件的系统分析极大地扩展了我们对伤害的原因和预防的理解。这些方法在过去 20 年中在医疗保健领域得到了广泛应用,但现在正受到批评和重新评估。在本文中,我们重新考虑事件分析的目的和价值以及适合当今医疗保健的方法。

正文

重新审视事件分析的首要需求是医疗保健本身正在发生巨大变化。人们的寿命越来越长,通常患有多种合并症,这些合并症需要在很长的时间内进行管理。我们的安全分析视野需要相应地扩大,以涵盖更长的时间范围。我们不仅需要考虑特定事件的预防,还需要考虑在包含医疗保健的社会和心理影响以及身体影响的长时间段内,利益、危害和风险之间的平衡。我们主张对安全事件的分析方法进行重大改变:假设患者及其家属将成为调查的合作伙伴,并尽可能从一开始就充分参与其中,考察更长的时间段,并在患者就医过程的不同时间点评估促成因素,在分析安全问题时更加适度和具有战略性,寻求理解成功和恢复以及失败,考虑临床流程的可操作性以及对其的偏离,并制定更具结构性和广泛性的建议方法。

结论

以前的事件分析方法只是被简单地采用和传播,而对这些分析的概念、方法、可靠性和结果的研究很少。需要对新方法的开发进行重大研究和投资。这些变化是深远的,将需要在实际和文化方面以及研究方面进行重大调整,以探索和评估最有效的方法。