Fujimoto Hiroki, Morioka Daichi, Akamine Syuryo, Takagi Shinsuke, Tosa Yasuyoshi, Kadomatsu Koichi, Ohkubo Fumio
From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Kanagawa.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Showa University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Aug;85(2):180-184. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002358.
In most children with a unilateral cleft lip (UCL), because lateral lip tissue on the cleft side is congenitally short, the lateral lip element should be appropriately excised during primary cheiloplasty so that symmetric nasolabial features are obtained after surgery. The purpose of this study was to measure how much of the lateral lip element is removed during primary cheiloplasty and compare the amount of sacrifice between different incision designs.
Preoperative 3-dimensional images of 50 infants with UCL were randomly selected. The incision designs of 3 representative techniques (Millard, Onizuka, and Fisher) were drawn on the images that were obtained before the primary repair. The lateral lip tissue excised by each technique was estimated as a percentage of the surface area of the sacrificed lateral lip to the entire lateral lip of the cleft side.
In the case of incomplete UCL, the median values (range) were 3.2% (1.1%-5.9%), 11.6% (8.3%-20.1%), and 27.2% (15.1%-42.3%) for the Millard, Onizuka, and Fisher repairs, respectively. In cases of complete UCL, no sacrifice was needed for the Millard repair, whereas the median values (range) were 10.6% (5.2%-28.9%) and 22.5% (11.5%-48.6%) for the Onizuka and Fisher repairs, respectively. In Millard repair, the median values (range) of the lateral lip element that was resected before skin closure according to the "cut-as-you-go" policy were 5.8% (2.2%-11.8%) in cases with an incomplete UCL and 4.9% (2.7%-9.1%) in cases with a complete UCL.
Our study demonstrated that sacrifice of the lateral lip element was minimal in the Millard repair, whereas it could exceed 20% in the Fisher repair. However, additional sacrifice of the advancement flap was needed in the Millard-type repair. The ratio of the lateral lip sacrifice varied between patients. Although UCL repair techniques should not be evaluated with the sacrifice ratio, excessive sacrifice of the lateral lip tissue can complicate the secondary lip correction. We recommend that surgeons estimate preoperatively how much lateral lip element will be sacrificed with each incision design using a 3-dimensional image for each child with a UCL.
在大多数单侧唇裂(UCL)患儿中,由于患侧的外侧唇组织先天性短小,在一期唇裂修复术中应适当切除外侧唇组织,以便术后获得对称的鼻唇形态。本研究的目的是测量一期唇裂修复术中切除的外侧唇组织量,并比较不同切口设计之间的切除量。
随机选取50例UCL婴儿的术前三维图像。在一期修复术前获得的图像上绘制3种代表性技术(Millard、Onizuka和Fisher)的切口设计。每种技术切除的外侧唇组织估计为患侧外侧唇牺牲面积占整个外侧唇面积的百分比。
在不完全性UCL病例中,Millard、Onizuka和Fisher修复术的中位数(范围)分别为3.2%(1.1%-5.9%)、11.6%(8.3%-20.1%)和27.2%(15.1%-42.3%)。在完全性UCL病例中,Millard修复术无需切除,而Onizuka和Fisher修复术的中位数(范围)分别为10.6%(5.2%-28.9%)和22.5%(11.5%-48.6%)。在Millard修复术中,根据“边切边整”原则,在皮肤缝合前切除的外侧唇组织中位数(范围)在不完全性UCL病例中为5.8%(2.2%-11.8%),在完全性UCL病例中为4.9%(2.7%-9.1%)。
我们的研究表明,Millard修复术中外侧唇组织的切除量最小,而Fisher修复术中可能超过20%。然而,Millard式修复术中需要额外切除推进瓣。外侧唇切除比例在患者之间有所不同。虽然不应以外侧唇切除比例来评估UCL修复技术,但外侧唇组织的过度切除会使二期唇矫正复杂化。我们建议外科医生术前使用三维图像估计每个UCL患儿每种切口设计将切除多少外侧唇组织。