• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

寰枢椎脱位的定量复位:寰齿轴夹角的矫正目标。

Quantitative Reduction of Basilar Invagination: Correction Target of Clivo-Axial Angle.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Department of Neurosurgery, King Edward VII Memorial Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

Clin Spine Surg. 2020 Oct;33(8):E386-E390. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000971.

DOI:10.1097/BSD.0000000000000971
PMID:32187082
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A mechanism-based reasoning and case-control study.

OBJECTIVE

To introduce correction target of clivo-axial angle (CXA) in quantitative surgical reduction of basilar invagination (BI).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The exact mechanism of BI with or without atlantoaxial dislocation is still unclear. Sagittal deformity is a key feature of BI. Correction of CXA directly influences subaxial cervical lordosis (increase of CXA equals the decrease of cervical lordosis). However, a quantitative reference for correction surgery has not been established.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CXA was divided by Chamberlain line into clivus tilt (CT) and axial tilt (AT). Patients diagnosed with BI were retrospectively included. Patients with degenerative cervical spine diseases or vascular diseases (without BI) were included as controls. CT, AT, and other common parameters were measured and analyzed with t test and multiple linear regression. Demonstration case was presented.

RESULTS

A total of 42 BI patients and 23 controls were included. Normal references for CXA, AT, and CT were 162.3±7.1, 93.8±6.5, and 68.6±3.8 degrees, respectively. BI patients had a 30.3-degree smaller CXA, a 15.5-degree smaller AT, and a 14.9-degree smaller CT. Basal angle (P=0.002) independently had a significant influence on extent of BI, while CT and AT did not. Demonstration case showed that CT was fixed and correcting AT to an ideal 94 degrees was optimal for an individual patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Proper quantitative correction of CXA needs to be individualized in consideration of CT and AT. The difference between actual AT and its ideal value (about 94 degrees) is the optimal target of CXA correction to decompress neural elements ventrally and recover better subaxial cervical lordosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

摘要

研究设计

基于机制推理的病例对照研究。

目的

介绍颅底凹陷症伴或不伴寰枢椎脱位患者定量手术复位时的枕髁-轴角(CXA)校正目标。

背景资料概要

颅底凹陷症伴或不伴寰枢椎脱位的确切机制仍不清楚。矢状面畸形是颅底凹陷症的一个关键特征。CXA 的矫正直接影响下颈椎的前凸(CXA 的增加等于颈椎前凸的减少)。然而,尚未建立定量矫正手术的参考标准。

材料和方法

通过 Chamberlain 线将 CXA 分为斜坡倾斜角(CT)和轴倾斜角(AT)。回顾性纳入诊断为颅底凹陷症的患者。将患有退行性颈椎疾病或血管疾病(无颅底凹陷症)的患者纳入对照组。采用 t 检验和多元线性回归分析测量和分析 CT、AT 和其他常见参数。展示了一个病例。

结果

共纳入 42 例颅底凹陷症患者和 23 例对照组。CXA、AT 和 CT 的正常参考值分别为 162.3±7.1、93.8±6.5 和 68.6±3.8 度。颅底凹陷症患者的 CXA 小 30.3 度,AT 小 15.5 度,CT 小 14.9 度。基底角(P=0.002)对颅底凹陷症的严重程度有独立的显著影响,而 CT 和 AT 没有。病例展示表明 CT 是固定的,将 AT 矫正到理想的 94 度对个体患者是最佳的。

结论

在考虑 CT 和 AT 的情况下,需要个体化适当的 CXA 定量矫正。实际 AT 与其理想值(约 94 度)之间的差异是 CXA 矫正的最佳目标,以实现对神经结构的减压和更好的下颈椎前凸的恢复。

证据等级

IV 级。

相似文献

1
Quantitative Reduction of Basilar Invagination: Correction Target of Clivo-Axial Angle.寰枢椎脱位的定量复位:寰齿轴夹角的矫正目标。
Clin Spine Surg. 2020 Oct;33(8):E386-E390. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000971.
2
Quantitative Correction of Cervical Sagittal Deformity in Atlanto-Axial Dislocation.寰枢椎脱位颈椎矢状面畸形的定量矫正
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Jul 15;44(14):975-981. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002999.
3
[Reduction of the atlantoaxial dislocation associated with basilar invagination through single-stage posterior approach: using Xuanwu occipital-cervical reduction surgical suite].[单阶段后路手术治疗伴基底凹陷的寰枢椎脱位:应用宣武医院枕颈复位手术套件]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Oct 1;57(10):63-68. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2019.10.012.
4
Basilar Invagination: A Tilt of the Foramen Magnum.颅底凹陷症:枕骨大孔倾斜。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Aug;164:e629-e635. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.05.027. Epub 2022 May 14.
5
Progressive halo-vest traction preceding posterior occipitocervical instrumented fusion for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation and basilar invagination.在进行后路枕颈器械融合术治疗不可复位的寰枢椎脱位和基底凹陷之前,先行渐进性头环背心牵引。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017 Nov;162:41-46. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
6
Subaxial lordosis loss and influence factors after posterior atlantoaxial fusion.寰枢后路融合术后下颈椎前凸丢失及其影响因素。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Mar 28;17(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03077-6.
7
[Geometric model of reduction in basilar invagination with atlantoaxial dislocation and its clinical application].
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Mar 1;59(3):216-221. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20200922-00720.
8
The reversibility of swan neck deformity in chronic atlantoaxial dislocations.慢性寰枢椎脱位中天鹅颈畸形的可复性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Apr 1;38(7):E379-85. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828625e4.
9
Clivopalate angle: a new diagnostic method for basilar invagination at magnetic resonance imaging.Clivopalate 角:磁共振成像诊断颅底凹陷症的新方法。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Jul;29(7):3450-3457. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5972-3. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
10
A device for three-dimensional quantitative assessment and alignment of C1-2 vertebrae during posterior distraction and fusion technique for atlantoaxial dislocation and/or basilar invagination.一种用于寰枢椎脱位和/或基底凹陷后路撑开融合技术中C1-2椎体三维定量评估及复位的装置。
Neurol India. 2018 Jan-Feb;66(1):181-187. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.222847.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of Failed Atlantoaxial Reduction: Causes of Failure and Strategies for Revision.寰枢椎复位失败分析:失败原因与翻修策略。
Orthop Surg. 2024 Nov;16(11):2741-2750. doi: 10.1111/os.14197. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
2
Reference values of four measures of craniocervical stability using upright dynamic magnetic resonance imaging.采用直立动态磁共振成像技术测量颅颈稳定性的四项指标参考值。
Radiol Med. 2023 Mar;128(3):330-339. doi: 10.1007/s11547-023-01588-8. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
3
Establish a new parameter "horizontal view-axial angle" and explore its role in the treatment of atlantoaxial instability diseases.
建立一个新的参数“水平视野-轴角”,并探讨其在寰枢椎不稳疾病治疗中的作用。
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:947462. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.947462. eCollection 2022.
4
Normal range of clivoaxial angle in adults using flexion and extension cervical magnetic resonance imaging scans.成人颈椎屈伸位磁共振成像扫描枢椎斜角的正常范围。
Neuroradiol J. 2021 Aug;34(4):348-354. doi: 10.1177/1971400921998982. Epub 2021 Mar 8.