Universidade Estadual de Campinas - Unicamp, Piracicaba Dental School , Department of Health Science and Pediatric Dentistry , Piracicaba , SP , Brazil .
University of Adelaide , Adelaide Dental School , Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health , Adelaide , South Australia , Australia .
Braz Oral Res. 2020 Mar 16;34:e021. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0021. eCollection 2020.
This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of Brazilian-Portuguese versions of the Health Literacy in Dentistry (HeLD) scale in a sample of elderly Brazilian participants. HeLD was initially translated into and cross-culturally adapted to the Brazilian Portuguese language. The reliability and validity of HeLD were then assessed in a sample of 535 non-institutionalized older persons who also completed a questionnaire containing sociodemographic and health information. Data were then randomly separated into two sub-datasets, and Confirmatory Factor Analysis was performed through structural equation modelling, with a maximum likelihood estimate to test the fit of the data to the factor structure of the long-and short-form HeLD (HeLD-29 and HeLD-14) versions of the instrument. The models were compared using the Akaike Information Criterion to assess goodness-of-fit and to determine which models were preferred. Internal consistency of HeLD was evaluated using Cronbach´s coefficient α. Both versions of HeLD were observed to demonstrate high internal reliability (Cronbach´s α ≥ 0.87 for all seven subscales), acceptable convergent (estimates of ≥ 0.50 for AVE and ≥ 0.70 for CR) and discriminant validity. However, the goodness-of-fit of the confirmatory factor analysis models demonstrated satisfactory results only for HeLD-14 subsamples (x2/df = 1.8-2.3; CFI = 0.97-0.98; GFI/NFI = 0.98-0.99; RMSEA = 0.05 and SRMR = 0.03). In conclusion, HeLD-14 was shown to be a reliable and valid instrument to measure oral health literacy in elderly Brazilian participants.
本研究旨在评估巴西-葡萄牙语版健康素养在牙科(HeLD)量表在巴西老年参与者样本中的信度和效度。HeLD 最初被翻译并跨文化适应为巴西葡萄牙语。然后,在 535 名非机构化的老年人样本中评估了 HeLD 的信度和效度,这些老年人还完成了一份包含社会人口统计学和健康信息的问卷。然后将数据随机分为两个子数据集,并通过结构方程模型进行验证性因素分析,使用最大似然估计来测试数据与长式和短式 HeLD(HeLD-29 和 HeLD-14)版本工具的因子结构的拟合度。使用赤池信息量准则(Akaike Information Criterion)比较模型,以评估拟合度并确定哪些模型更优。HeLD 的内部一致性使用 Cronbach 系数α进行评估。两种版本的 HeLD 均表现出较高的内部可靠性(所有七个子量表的 Cronbach 系数α均≥0.87),可接受的收敛性(AVE 的估计值≥0.50,CR 的估计值≥0.70)和区分效度。然而,验证性因素分析模型的拟合优度仅对 HeLD-14 子样本表现出令人满意的结果(x2/df=1.8-2.3;CFI=0.97-0.98;GFI/NFI=0.98-0.99;RMSEA=0.05 和 SRMR=0.03)。总之,HeLD-14 被证明是一种可靠且有效的工具,可用于测量巴西老年参与者的口腔健康素养。