• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于糖尿病患者的口腔健康素养量表的心理测量学特性。

Psychometric properties of an oral health literacy scale for people living with diabetes.

机构信息

Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros - Unimontes, Center of Health and Biological Sciences, Department of Dentistry, Montes Claros, MG, Brazil.

Faculdades Unidas do Norte de Minas - Funorte, Montes Claros, MG, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz Oral Res. 2023 Mar 31;37:e022. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0022. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0022
PMID:37018804
Abstract

This study evaluated the construct validity of the instrument Oral Health Literacy among diabetics. A probabilistic random sample of 239 diabetics from an infinite population answered the 10 items of the questionnaire. The structural validity was assessed by confirmatory factor analysis and goodness of fit, chi-square per degrees of freedom ratio (X2/df), comparative fit index (CFI), goodness-of-fit index (GFI), and root-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA). Internal consistency was estimated by the average variance extracted (AVE) and composite reliability (CR). The scores were dichotomized with the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval as the cutoff point. The three-dimensional model presented good quality parameters (X2 /df = 2.459; CFI = 0.988; TLI = 0.981) and poor RMSEA (0.078). Internal consistency was adequate; AVE for the Access, Understand/appraise, and Apply subscales were 0.831, 0.981, and 0.954 and the CR for these subscales were 0.893, 0.962, and 0.822, respectively. Inadequate literacy ranged from 41.8 to 48.1%. The three-dimensional model identified (access, understand/appraise, and apply) showed structural validity, good internal consistency, and understandability.

摘要

本研究评估了糖尿病患者口腔健康素养工具的结构效度。从无限总体中采用概率随机抽样方法抽取了 239 例糖尿病患者对问卷的 10 个条目进行回答。结构效度通过验证性因素分析和拟合优度、卡方自由度比(X2/df)、比较拟合指数(CFI)、拟合优度指数(GFI)和近似均方根误差(RMSEA)进行评估。内部一致性通过平均方差抽取(AVE)和综合可靠性(CR)进行估计。将得分分为两个等级,95%置信区间上限为截断点。三维模型具有良好的质量参数(X2/df=2.459;CFI=0.988;TLI=0.981)和较差的 RMSEA(0.078)。内部一致性适中;Access、Understand/appraise 和 Apply 分量表的 AVE 分别为 0.831、0.981 和 0.954,这些分量表的 CR 分别为 0.893、0.962 和 0.822。阅读能力不足的比例为 41.8%至 48.1%。三维模型确定的(获取、理解/评价和应用)具有结构有效性、良好的内部一致性和可理解性。

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of an oral health literacy scale for people living with diabetes.用于糖尿病患者的口腔健康素养量表的心理测量学特性。
Braz Oral Res. 2023 Mar 31;37:e022. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0022. eCollection 2023.
2
Confirmatory factor analysis of the health literacy in dentistry scale (HeLD) in the Australian population.澳大利亚人群口腔健康素养量表(HeLD)的验证性因素分析
Community Dent Health. 2018 Aug 30;35(3):140-147. doi: 10.1922/CDH_4325Ju08.
3
Psychometrics and measurement invariance: Health Literacy Scale for Vietnamese and Indonesian married immigrants.心理计量学和测量不变性:越南和印度尼西亚已婚移民的健康素养量表。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Jun;78(6):1836-1847. doi: 10.1111/jan.15241. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
4
Investigating the structural validity and reliability of the sexual health literacy for adults (SHELA) questionnaire among a sample of women in Qazvin, Iran.调查伊朗卡兹温女性样本中成人性健康素养量表(SHELA)问卷的结构效度和信度。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 Dec 16;22(1):524. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-02112-2.
5
The transcultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the Oral Health Literacy Scale for Diabetic Patients.《中文版糖尿病患者口腔健康素养量表的跨文化调适与验证》。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 7;24(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03965-9.
6
Cross-cultural psychometric assessment of an appetite questionnaire for patients with cancer.针对癌症患者的食欲问卷进行跨文化心理测量评估。
Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2018 Apr-Jun;40(2):152-159. doi: 10.1590/2237-6089-2017-0093. Epub 2018 May 14.
7
Psychometric characteristics of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General when applied to Brazilian cancer patients: a cross-cultural adaptation and validation.癌症治疗功能评估通用版应用于巴西癌症患者时的心理测量学特征:跨文化适应与验证
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Jan 13;14:8. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0400-8.
8
Severity of temporomandibular disorders in women: validity and reliability of the Fonseca Anamnestic Index.女性颞下颌关节紊乱严重程度:Fonseca 病史指数的效度和信度。
Braz Oral Res. 2014;28:16-21. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242013005000026.
9
Psychometric properties of Health Literacy in Dentistry scale in an elderly Brazilian population.牙科学健康素养量表在巴西老年人群中的心理测量特性。
Braz Oral Res. 2020 Mar 16;34:e021. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0021. eCollection 2020.
10
Psychometric properties of the Georgian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: a cross-sectional study.格鲁吉亚版安全态度问卷的心理测量特性:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 13;10(2):e034863. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034863.

引用本文的文献

1
The transcultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the Oral Health Literacy Scale for Diabetic Patients.《中文版糖尿病患者口腔健康素养量表的跨文化调适与验证》。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 7;24(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03965-9.