Dong Wenxuan, Zhang Gang, Li Zhongchao, Liu Ling, Zhang Shuai, Li Defa
State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Animals (Basel). 2020 Mar 16;10(3):495. doi: 10.3390/ani10030495.
This study was conducted to determine and compare digestible energy (DE) and metabolizable energy (ME) values and the apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of energy and nutrients in eight ingredients fed to both growing pigs and sows. Two experiments with 48 crossbred barrows or six non-pregnant sows were allotted to eight treatments in a completely randomized design or a pseudo Latin square with six replicated pigs per dietary treatment. The dietary treatments were formulated with two cereal ingredients: corn and wheat; two ingredients with a high protein level and a low fiber level (HPLF): soybean meal (SBM) and cottonseed meal (CSM); two ingredients with medium protein level and medium fiber level (MPMF): corn distiller' dried grains with solubles (DDGS) and corn germ meal (CGM); and two ingredients with a low protein level and a high fiber level (LPHF): wheat bran (WB) and palm kernel meal (PKM), respectively. Adult sows had greater DE and ME values and ATTD of energy and nutrients when fed cereal ingredients compared with growing pigs, and had lower DE and ME contents and ATTD of energy and nutrients except for acid detergent fiber (ADF) when fed HPLF ingredients compared with growing pigs. Moreover, no differences were observed between adult sows and growing pigs in DE and ME contents and ATTD of energy and nutrients when fed MPMF and LPHF ingredients, except that adult sows showed a greater ATTD of crude protein (CP) when fed MPMF ingredients compared with growing pigs. Our results indicate that sows had a lower available energy and nutrient digestibility when fed SBM or CSM compared with growing pigs. Crude protein contents in ingredients should be considered when predicting DE and ME values in sows based on the DE and ME values measured from growing pigs.
本研究旨在测定和比较生长猪和母猪饲喂的8种饲料原料中可消化能量(DE)、代谢能(ME)值以及能量和养分的表观全肠道消化率(ATTD)。两个试验分别选用48头杂交公猪或6头非妊娠母猪,采用完全随机设计或伪拉丁方设计,每种日粮处理设6头重复猪,分为8种处理。日粮处理由两种谷物原料(玉米和小麦)、两种高蛋白低纤维原料(HPLF)(豆粕(SBM)和棉籽粕(CSM))、两种中等蛋白中等纤维原料(MPMF)(玉米干酒糟及其可溶物(DDGS)和玉米胚芽粕(CGM))以及两种低蛋白高纤维原料(LPHF)(麦麸(WB)和棕榈仁粕(PKM))组成。与生长猪相比,成年母猪饲喂谷物原料时能量和养分的DE和ME值以及ATTD更高;与生长猪相比,成年母猪饲喂HPLF原料时能量和养分的DE和ME含量以及ATTD更低,但酸性洗涤纤维(ADF)除外。此外,成年母猪和生长猪饲喂MPMF和LPHF原料时,能量和养分的DE和ME含量以及ATTD没有差异,但成年母猪饲喂MPMF原料时粗蛋白(CP)的ATTD比生长猪更高。我们的结果表明,与生长猪相比,母猪饲喂SBM或CSM时可利用能量和养分消化率较低。基于生长猪测得的DE和ME值预测母猪的DE和ME值时,应考虑原料中的粗蛋白含量。