Law Jonathan P, Pickup Luke, Townend Jonathan N, Ferro Charles J
University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
Clin Med (Lond). 2020 Mar;20(2):151-155. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0445.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global health problem affecting up to 14% of the adult population in developed countries. On the basis of current guidelines, patients with CKD will often fulfil criteria for both short-term and long-term anticoagulation. Paradoxically, patients with CKD are not only at a higher risk of thrombosis, they are also at increased risk of bleeding. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of many anticoagulant therapies are significantly affected by renal dysfunction. In addition, patients with advanced CKD are often systematically excluded from major clinical trials. As such, the decision on whether to anticoagulate or not, and if so with what agent, poses significant challenges. A solid understanding of the condition in question and the available treatments is required to make an informed judgement call. An in-depth appreciation of the advantages and disadvantages of the currently available anticoagulants is a key element in the decision-making process.
慢性肾脏病(CKD)是一个全球性的健康问题,在发达国家影响着高达14%的成年人口。根据现行指南,CKD患者常常符合短期和长期抗凝的标准。矛盾的是,CKD患者不仅血栓形成风险更高,出血风险也增加。此外,许多抗凝治疗的药代动力学和药效学受到肾功能不全的显著影响。另外,晚期CKD患者常常被系统性地排除在主要临床试验之外。因此,决定是否进行抗凝以及如果进行抗凝使用何种药物,带来了重大挑战。需要对相关病情和可用治疗方法有扎实的了解,才能做出明智的判断。深入了解当前可用抗凝剂的优缺点是决策过程中的关键要素。