Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (K.C.S., N.B., B.K.N.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Dr Siontis' current affiliation is the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Circulation. 2018 Oct 9;138(15):1519-1529. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035418.
Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on dialysis were excluded from clinical trials of direct oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation (AF). Recent data have raised concerns regarding the safety of dabigatran and rivaroxaban, but apixaban has not been evaluated despite current labeling supporting its use in this population. The goal of this study was to determine patterns of apixaban use and its associated outcomes in dialysis-dependent patients with ESKD and AF.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries included in the United States Renal Data System (October 2010 to December 2015). Eligible patients were those with ESKD and AF undergoing dialysis who initiated treatment with an oral anticoagulant. Because of the small number of dabigatran and rivaroxaban users, outcomes were only assessed in patients treated with apixaban or warfarin. Apixaban and warfarin patients were matched (1:3) based on prognostic score. Differences between groups in survival free of stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and death were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were derived from Cox regression analyses.
The study population consisted of 25 523 patients (45.7% women; 68.2±11.9 years of age), including 2351 patients on apixaban and 23 172 patients on warfarin. An annual increase in apixaban prescriptions was observed after its marketing approval at the end of 2012, such that 26.6% of new anticoagulant prescriptions in 2015 were for apixaban. In matched cohorts, there was no difference in the risks of stroke/systemic embolism between apixaban and warfarin (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.69-1.12; P=0.29), but apixaban was associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.87; P<0.001). In sensitivity analyses, standard-dose apixaban (5 mg twice a day; n=1034) was associated with significantly lower risks of stroke/systemic embolism and death as compared with either reduced-dose apixaban (2.5 mg twice a day; n=1317; HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.37-0.98; P=0.04 for stroke/systemic embolism; HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45-0.92; P=0.01 for death) or warfarin (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.42-0.97; P=0.04 for stroke/systemic embolism; HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46-0.85; P=0.003 for death).
Among patients with ESKD and AF on dialysis, apixaban use may be associated with a lower risk of major bleeding compared with warfarin, with a standard 5 mg twice a day dose also associated with reductions in thromboembolic and mortality risk.
接受透析治疗的终末期肾病(ESKD)患者被排除在心房颤动(AF)的直接口服抗凝剂临床试验之外。最近的数据引起了对达比加群和利伐沙班安全性的担忧,但阿哌沙班尚未进行评估,尽管目前的标签支持在该人群中使用。本研究的目的是确定阿哌沙班在接受透析治疗的 ESKD 和 AF 患者中的使用模式及其相关结局。
我们对美国肾脏病数据系统(2010 年 10 月至 2015 年 12 月)中包含的 Medicare 受益人的回顾性队列研究进行了分析。符合条件的患者是接受透析治疗且患有 ESKD 和 AF 的患者,他们开始接受口服抗凝剂治疗。由于达比加群和利伐沙班的使用者数量较少,因此仅评估了接受阿哌沙班或华法林治疗的患者的结局。根据预后评分,阿哌沙班和华法林患者(1:3)进行匹配。使用 Kaplan-Meier 分析评估无中风或全身性栓塞、大出血、胃肠道出血、颅内出血和死亡的生存差异。使用 Cox 回归分析得出风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。
研究人群包括 25523 名患者(45.7%为女性;68.2±11.9 岁),其中 2351 名患者使用阿哌沙班,23172 名患者使用华法林。在 2012 年底获得市场批准后,阿哌沙班的处方量逐年增加,因此 2015 年新抗凝剂处方中有 26.6%是阿哌沙班。在匹配队列中,阿哌沙班与华法林的中风/全身性栓塞风险无差异(HR,0.88;95%CI,0.69-1.12;P=0.29),但阿哌沙班大出血风险显著降低(HR,0.72;95%CI,0.59-0.87;P<0.001)。在敏感性分析中,与低剂量阿哌沙班(2.5mg,每日两次;n=1317)相比,标准剂量阿哌沙班(5mg,每日两次;n=1034)与中风/全身性栓塞和死亡风险降低相关(HR,0.61;95%CI,0.37-0.98;P=0.04 用于中风/全身性栓塞;HR,0.64;95%CI,0.45-0.92;P=0.01 用于死亡)或华法林(HR,0.64;95%CI,0.42-0.97;P=0.04 用于中风/全身性栓塞;HR,0.63;95%CI,0.46-0.85;P=0.003 用于死亡)。
在接受透析治疗的 ESKD 和 AF 患者中,与华法林相比,阿哌沙班的使用可能与大出血风险降低相关,标准 5mg,每日两次剂量也与血栓栓塞和死亡率降低相关。