• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

土耳其语中是否存在特定的 RC 附着偏好?语义因素的协商。

Is There a Particular RC Attachment Preference in Turkish? Negotiating the Effects of Semantic Factors.

机构信息

Division of English Translation and Interpreting, Department of Western Languages and Literature, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Kırıkkale University, 71450, Kirikkale, Turkey.

Institute of Cognitive Science, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany.

出版信息

J Psycholinguist Res. 2020 Aug;49(4):511-539. doi: 10.1007/s10936-020-09698-4.

DOI:10.1007/s10936-020-09698-4
PMID:32189183
Abstract

The goal of this study is to investigate whether or not Turkish has a particular preference in ambiguity resolution of relative clause attachment when two possible NPs are available as in "Someone shot [NP1 the servant] of [NP2 the actress] [RC who was on the balcony]ˮ. The relevant literature has showed that RC attachment preferences-whether NP1 or NP2-vary across languages, which results in contradictory evidence if some universal processing principle is assumed. Turkish differs typologically from English and other European languages in the construction of RC using complex "genitive-possessor" construction. In order to make a valid cross-linguistic comparison it is therefore of particular importance to carefully control potential extraneous factors which might obstruct true attachment preferences-if they exist. The present study, which controls various confounding factors, reveals that both syntactic and non-syntactic factors should be taken into consideration when constructing the stimulus sentences for testing attachment ambiguity resolution. Specifically, we propose that the semantic relations (e.g. part-whole relations) between the noun phrases of the genitive-possessive construction and the semantic associations with the proximal as well as with the distal predicate play a key role in the attachment preferences of monolingual Turkish native speakers in this type of ambiguous sentences. When these extraneous factors were controlled, no preference was observed.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨在“某人枪击了[NP1 女演员的仆人] [RC 他在阳台上]”这样的存在两个可能的 NP 时,土耳其语是否对关系从句附着的歧义消解有特殊偏好。相关文献表明,RC 附着偏好(无论是 NP1 还是 NP2)在不同语言之间存在差异,如果假设存在普遍的处理原则,则会得出相互矛盾的证据。土耳其语在使用复杂的“属格-所有格”结构构造 RC 方面与英语和其他欧洲语言在类型上存在差异。因此,为了进行有效的跨语言比较,仔细控制可能存在的阻碍真实附着偏好的额外因素非常重要。本研究控制了各种混杂因素,揭示了在构建用于测试附着歧义消解的刺激句子时,应考虑句法和非句法因素。具体来说,我们提出属格所有格结构中的名词短语之间的语义关系(例如部分-整体关系)以及与近端和远端谓词的语义关联在这种类型的歧义句中对单语土耳其语母语者的附着偏好起着关键作用。当控制了这些额外因素时,没有观察到偏好。

相似文献

1
Is There a Particular RC Attachment Preference in Turkish? Negotiating the Effects of Semantic Factors.土耳其语中是否存在特定的 RC 附着偏好?语义因素的协商。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2020 Aug;49(4):511-539. doi: 10.1007/s10936-020-09698-4.
2
Emotional nouns affect attachment decisions in sentence completion tasks.情感名词在句子完成任务中会影响依恋决策。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(9):1740-59. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.662989. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
3
Testing the online reading effects of emotionality on relative clause attachment.测试情感因素对关系从句附着的在线阅读效果。
Cogn Process. 2017 Nov;18(4):543-553. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0811-z. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
4
The correspondence between sentence production and corpus frequencies in modifier attachment.修饰语附着中句子生成与语料库频率之间的对应关系。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2002 Jul;55(3):879-96. doi: 10.1080/02724980143000604.
5
Semantic support and parallel parsing in Chinese.中文中的语义支持与并行解析。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2015 Jun;44(3):251-76. doi: 10.1007/s10936-014-9296-4.
6
Sentence complexity and working memory effects in ambiguity resolution.歧义消解中的句子复杂性与工作记忆效应。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2013 Oct;42(5):393-411. doi: 10.1007/s10936-012-9224-4.
7
Cross-structural priming: prepositional phrase attachment primes relative clause attachment.跨结构启动:介词短语附着启动关系从句附着。
Exp Psychol. 2011;58(3):227-34. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000089.
8
Individual word and phrase frequency effects in collocational processing: Evidence from typologically different languages, English and Turkish.词汇和短语频率在搭配处理中的影响:来自不同类型语言的证据,英语和土耳其语。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2024 Aug;50(8):1287-1314. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001324. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
9
Syntactic complexity and ambiguity resolution in a free word order language: behavioral and electrophysiological evidences from Basque.一种词序自由语言中的句法复杂性与歧义消解:来自巴斯克语的行为和电生理证据
Brain Lang. 2009 Apr;109(1):1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.12.003. Epub 2009 Feb 14.
10
Highs and Lows in English Attachment.英语依恋中的高潮与低谷。
Cognition. 2015 Nov;144:116-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.07.018. Epub 2015 Aug 8.