Amin Reshma, Jahnke Nikki, Waters Valerie
The Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Pediatric Respirology, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5G 1X8.
University of Liverpool, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Eaton Road, Liverpool, UK, L12 2AP.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 18;3(3):CD009249. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009249.pub5.
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is one of the most common emerging multi-drug resistant organisms found in the lungs of people with cystic fibrosis and its prevalence is increasing. Chronic infection with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia has recently been shown to be an independent predictor of pulmonary exacerbation requiring hospitalization and antibiotics. However, the role of antibiotic treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection in people with cystic fibrosis is still unclear. This is an update of a previously published review.
The objective of our review is to assess the effectiveness of antibiotic treatment for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in people with cystic fibrosis. The primary objective is to assess this in relation to lung function and pulmonary exacerbations in the setting of acute pulmonary exacerbations. The secondary objective is to assess this in relation to the eradication of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books. We also searched a registry of ongoing trials and the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews. Date of latest search: 03 March 2020.
Randomized controlled trials of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia mono-infection or Stenotrophomonas maltophilia co-infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in either the setting of an acute pulmonary exacerbation or a chronic infection treated with suppressive antibiotic therapy.
Both authors independently assessed the trials identified by the search for potential inclusion in the review.
We identified only one trial of antibiotic treatment of pulmonary exacerbations that included people with cystic fibrosis with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. However, this trial had to be excluded because data was not available per pathogen.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review did not identify any evidence regarding the effectiveness of antibiotic treatment for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in people with cystic fibrosis. Until such evidence becomes available, clinicians need to use their clinical judgement as to whether or not to treat Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection in people with cystic fibrosis. Randomized clinical trials are needed to address these unanswered clinical questions.
嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌是在囊性纤维化患者肺部发现的最常见的新出现的多重耐药菌之一,其患病率正在上升。最近研究表明,嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌慢性感染是需要住院治疗并使用抗生素的肺部病情加重的独立预测因素。然而,抗生素治疗嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染在囊性纤维化患者中的作用仍不明确。这是对之前发表的一篇综述的更新。
我们综述的目的是评估抗生素治疗对囊性纤维化患者嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染的有效性。主要目的是在急性肺部病情加重的情况下,评估其对肺功能和肺部病情加重的影响。次要目的是评估其对嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌根除的影响。
我们检索了Cochrane囊性纤维化试验注册库,该注册库通过电子数据库检索以及对期刊和会议摘要书籍的手工检索编制而成。我们还检索了正在进行的试验登记册以及相关文章和综述的参考文献列表。最新检索日期:2020年3月3日。
在急性肺部病情加重或采用抑制性抗生素治疗的慢性感染情况下,针对嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌单一感染或嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌与铜绿假单胞菌合并感染的随机对照试验。
两位作者独立评估检索到的试验,以确定其是否可能纳入本综述。
我们仅发现一项关于抗生素治疗肺部病情加重的试验,该试验纳入了患有嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染的囊性纤维化患者。然而,由于无法按病原体提供数据,该试验不得不被排除。
本综述未发现任何关于抗生素治疗对囊性纤维化患者嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染有效性的证据。在获得此类证据之前,临床医生需要运用临床判断来决定是否治疗囊性纤维化患者的嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染。需要进行随机临床试验来解决这些未解答的临床问题。