Mahmoud Mona, Abdallah Nagwa A, El-Shafei Kawther, Tawfik Nabil F, El-Sayed Hoda S
Dairy Department (Microbiology lab.), National Research Centre, Dokki, 12622, Cairo, Egypt.
Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, 11566, Cairo, Egypt.
Heliyon. 2020 Mar 10;6(3):e03541. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03541. eCollection 2020 Mar.
A comparison between the most investigated alginate-based encapsulating agents was performed in the current study. Here, the survivability of microencapsulated with alginate (Alg) combined with skim milk (Sm), dextrin (Dex), denatured whey protein (DWP) or coated with chitosan (Ch) was evaluated after exposure to different heat treatments and in presence of some food additives, during storage and under simulated gastrointestinal condition. In addition, the encapsulated cells were evaluated for production of different bioactive compounds such as exopolysacchar. ides and antimicrobial substances compared with the unencapsulated cells. The results showed that only Alg-Sm maintained the viability of the cells >10 cfu/g at the pasteurization temperature (65 °C for 30 min). Interestingly, storage under refrigeration conditions increased the viability of entrapped within all the tested encapsulating agents for 4 weeks. However, under freezing condition, only Alg-DWP and Alg-Sm enhanced the survival of the entrapped cells for 3 months. All the microencapsulated cells were capable of growing at the different NaCl concentrations (1%-5%) except for cells encapsulated with Alg-Dex, showed viability loss at 3% and 5% NaCl concentrations. Tolerance of the microencapsulated cells toward organic acids was varied depending on the type of organic acid. Alg-Ch and Alg-Sm provide better survival for the cells under simulated gastric juice; however, all offer a good survival for the cells under simulated intestinal condition. Our findings indicated that Alg-Sm proved to be the most promising encapsulating combination that maintains the survivability of to the recommended dose level under almost all the stress conditions adopted in the current study. Interestingly, the results also revealed that microencapsulation does not affect the metabolic activity of the entrapped cells and there was no significant difference in production of bioactive compounds between the encapsulated and the unencapsulated cells.
本研究对研究最多的基于藻酸盐的包封剂进行了比较。在此,评估了用藻酸盐(Alg)与脱脂牛奶(Sm)、糊精(Dex)、变性乳清蛋白(DWP)组合微囊化或用壳聚糖(Ch)包被的微囊化细胞在经过不同热处理后、在存在一些食品添加剂的情况下、储存期间以及模拟胃肠道条件下的存活率。此外,与未包封的细胞相比,评估了包封细胞产生不同生物活性化合物(如胞外多糖和抗菌物质)的情况。结果表明,只有Alg-Sm在巴氏杀菌温度(65℃,30分钟)下能使细胞活力维持在>10 cfu/g。有趣的是,在冷藏条件下储存4周可提高所有测试包封剂中包封细胞的活力。然而,在冷冻条件下,只有Alg-DWP和Alg-Sm能使包封细胞的存活率提高3个月。除了用Alg-Dex包封的细胞在3%和5% NaCl浓度下活力丧失外,所有微囊化细胞都能在不同NaCl浓度(1%-5%)下生长。微囊化细胞对有机酸的耐受性因有机酸类型而异。Alg-Ch和Alg-Sm在模拟胃液中能为细胞提供更好的存活率;然而,在模拟肠道条件下,所有包封剂都能为细胞提供良好的存活率。我们的研究结果表明,在本研究采用的几乎所有应激条件下,Alg-Sm被证明是最有前景的包封组合,能将细胞的存活率维持在推荐剂量水平。有趣的是,结果还表明微囊化不会影响包封细胞的代谢活性,并且包封细胞和未包封细胞之间生物活性化合物的产生没有显著差异。