Suppr超能文献

超声在肩袖撕裂诊断中的应用:系统评价和 Meta 分析。

Diagnostic performance of ultrasound for rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound, First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Second Clinical College of Jinan University, Shenzhen Medical Ultrasond Engineering Center,Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen ,China.

出版信息

Med Ultrason. 2020 May 11;22(2):197-202. doi: 10.11152/mu-2352. Epub 2020 Feb 16.

Abstract

AIM

Rotator cuff (RC) tears are considered to be the main reason for shoulder pain. Although ultrasound is a useful method to detect it, its effectiveness when diagnosing RC tears has been a heated discussion. Therefore, we aimed at evaluating RC tears' ultrasound accuracy by conducting a systemically review and pooled comprehensive analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Relevant articles up to May 2018 were searched from the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Pubmed databases. Either arthroscopy or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was considered as a reference standard. The results were estimated by pooled-sensitivity (P-SEN), pooled-specificity (P-SPE), pooled-diagnostic odds ratio (P-DOR), pooled-likelihood ratio+ (PLR+), pooled-likelihood ratio- (P-LR-), and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC).

RESULT

We selected seven prospective studies in accordance with the inclusion criteria that covered 554 rotator cuff tears in 868 patients. The P-SEN, P-SPE, P-LR+, P-LR-, P-DOR, area under the SROC curve of diagnostic performance of ultrasound for RC and post-test probability were 95% (95% CI: 88 - 98), 72% (95% CI: 61 - 81), 3.41 (95% CI: 2.40 - 4.84), 0.08 (95% CI: 0.03 - 0.16), 45.31 (95% CI: 21.04 - 97.59), 89% (95% CI: 0.86 - 0.91), and 46% and 2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our metaanalysis demonstrates that ultrasound has a high efficiency for RC tears' diagnosis. It can be a promising method in patients with suspected RC tears because of its high sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy.

摘要

目的

肩袖撕裂被认为是肩部疼痛的主要原因。尽管超声是一种检测肩袖撕裂的有用方法,但它在诊断肩袖撕裂方面的有效性一直存在争议。因此,我们旨在通过系统评价和汇总综合分析来评估超声诊断肩袖撕裂的准确性。

材料与方法

截至 2018 年 5 月,我们从 Cochrane 图书馆、Embase 和 Pubmed 数据库中检索到相关文章。关节镜或磁共振成像(MRI)被认为是参考标准。结果通过汇总敏感性(P-SEN)、汇总特异性(P-SPE)、汇总诊断比值比(P-DOR)、汇总似然比+(PLR+)、汇总似然比-(P-LR-)和汇总受试者工作特征曲线下面积(SROC)来评估。

结果

我们根据纳入标准选择了 7 项前瞻性研究,共纳入 868 例患者的 554 例肩袖撕裂。超声诊断肩袖撕裂的汇总敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比、阴性似然比、诊断比值比和 SROC 曲线下面积分别为 95%(95%可信区间:88% - 98%)、72%(95%可信区间:61% - 81%)、3.41(95%可信区间:2.40 - 4.84)、0.08(95%可信区间:0.03 - 0.16)、45.31(95%可信区间:21.04 - 97.59)、89%(95%可信区间:0.86 - 0.91)和 46%和 2%。

结论

我们的荟萃分析表明,超声对肩袖撕裂的诊断具有很高的效率。由于其高敏感性、特异性和诊断准确性,它可能成为疑似肩袖撕裂患者的一种有前途的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验