Suppr超能文献

一些研究人员穿着黄色裤子,但阅读同意书的参与者更少:探索和改进人体研究中的同意书阅读情况。

Some researchers wear yellow pants, but even fewer participants read consent forms: Exploring and improving consent form reading in human subjects research.

作者信息

Douglas Benjamin D, McGorray Emma L, Ewell Patrick J

机构信息

Behavioral Lab, Stanford University Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.

Department of Psychology, Northwestern University.

出版信息

Psychol Methods. 2021 Feb;26(1):61-68. doi: 10.1037/met0000267. Epub 2020 Mar 19.

Abstract

Though consent forms include important information, those experienced with behavioral research often observe that participants do not carefully read consent forms. Three studies examined participants' reading of consent forms for in-person experiments. In each study, we inserted the phrase "some researchers wear yellow pants" into sections of the consent form and measured participants' reading of the form by testing their recall of the color yellow. In Study 1, we found that the majority of participants did not read consent forms thoroughly. This suggests that overall, participants sign consent forms that they have not read, confirming what has been observed anecdotally and documented in other research domains. Study 2 examined which sections of consent forms participants read and found that participants were more likely to read the first 2 sections of a consent form (procedure and risks) than later sections (benefits and anonymity and confidentiality). Given that rates of recall of the target phrase were under 70% even when the sentence was inserted into earlier sections of the form, we explored ways to improve participant reading in Study 3. Theorizing that the presence of a researcher may influence participants' retention of the form, we assigned participants to read the form with or without a researcher present. Results indicated that removing the researcher from the room while participants read the consent form decreased recall of the target phrase. Implications of these results and suggestions for future researchers are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

尽管同意书包含重要信息,但那些有行为研究经验的人常常观察到参与者不会仔细阅读同意书。三项研究考察了参与者对面对面实验同意书的阅读情况。在每项研究中,我们在同意书的部分内容中插入了“一些研究人员穿黄色裤子”这句话,并通过测试他们对黄色的记忆来衡量参与者对同意书的阅读情况。在研究1中,我们发现大多数参与者没有彻底阅读同意书。这表明总体而言,参与者签署了他们未读过的同意书,证实了在其他研究领域所观察到的轶事及记录。研究2考察了参与者阅读同意书的哪些部分,发现参与者更有可能阅读同意书的前两部分(程序和风险),而不是后面的部分(益处、匿名性和保密性)。鉴于即使将句子插入同意书的前面部分,目标短语的记忆率仍低于70%,我们在研究3中探索了提高参与者阅读的方法。基于研究人员的在场可能会影响参与者对同意书的记忆这一理论,我们让参与者在有或没有研究人员在场的情况下阅读同意书。结果表明,在参与者阅读同意书时让研究人员离开房间会降低对目标短语的记忆。讨论了这些结果的意义以及对未来研究人员的建议。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2021美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验