• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测模型:用于评估急诊科下消化道出血患者 30 天结局。

Prediction Model for 30-day Outcomes Among Emergency Department Patients with Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

机构信息

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario.

University of Ottawa, School of Epidemiology, Epidemiology and Public Health, Ottawa, Ontario.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2020 Feb 24;21(2):343-347. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.1.45420.

DOI:10.5811/westjem.2020.1.45420
PMID:32191192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7081856/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There are currently no robust tools available for risk stratification of emergency department (ED) patients with lower gastrointestinal bleed (LGIB). Our aim was to identify risk factors and develop a preliminary model to predict 30-day serious adverse events among ED LGIB patients.

METHODS

We conducted a health records review including adult ED patients with acute LGIB. We used a composite outcome of 30-day all-cause death, recurrent LGIB, need for intervention to control the bleeding, and severe adverse events resulting in intensive care unit admission. One researcher collected data for variables and a second researcher independently collected 10% of the variables for inter-observer reliability. We used backward multivariable logistic regression analysis and SELECTION=SCORE option to create a preliminary risk-stratification tool. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the final model.

RESULTS

Of 372 patients, 48 experienced an adverse outcome. We found that age ≥75 years, hemoglobin ≤100 g/L, international normalized ratio ≥2.0, ongoing bleed in the ED, and a medical history of colorectal polyps were statistically significant predictors in the multivariable regression analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) for the model was 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.89). We developed a scoring system based on the logistic regression model and found a sensitivity 0.96 (0.90-1.00) and specificity 0.53 (0.48-0.59) for a cut-off score of 1.

CONCLUSION

This model showed good ability to differentiate patients with and without serious outcomes as evidenced by the high AUC and sensitivity. The results of this study could be used in the prospective derivation of a clinical decision tool.

摘要

简介

目前尚无用于急诊科(ED)下消化道出血(LGIB)患者风险分层的可靠工具。我们的目的是确定风险因素并建立预测 ED LGIB 患者 30 天严重不良事件的初步模型。

方法

我们对包括急性 LGIB 在内的成年 ED 患者进行了病历回顾。我们使用 30 天全因死亡、复发性 LGIB、需要干预控制出血、导致重症监护病房入院的严重不良事件的复合结局。一名研究人员收集变量数据,另一名研究人员独立收集 10%的变量用于观察者间可靠性。我们使用向后多变量逻辑回归分析和 SELECTION=SCORE 选项创建初步风险分层工具。我们评估了最终模型的诊断准确性。

结果

在 372 名患者中,有 48 名发生不良结局。我们发现年龄≥75 岁、血红蛋白≤100g/L、国际标准化比值≥2.0、ED 持续出血和结直肠息肉病史是多变量回归分析中的统计学显著预测因素。该模型的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.83(95%置信区间,0.77-0.89)。我们根据逻辑回归模型开发了一个评分系统,发现截断值为 1 时的敏感性为 0.96(0.90-1.00),特异性为 0.53(0.48-0.59)。

结论

该模型的 AUC 和敏感性较高,表明其具有良好的区分有严重结局和无严重结局患者的能力。该研究的结果可用于前瞻性推导临床决策工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8301/7081856/4dd67cc9c576/wjem-21-343-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8301/7081856/4dd67cc9c576/wjem-21-343-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8301/7081856/4dd67cc9c576/wjem-21-343-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction Model for 30-day Outcomes Among Emergency Department Patients with Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding.预测模型:用于评估急诊科下消化道出血患者 30 天结局。
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Feb 24;21(2):343-347. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.1.45420.
2
Comparison of clinical prediction tools and identification of risk factors for adverse outcomes in acute lower GI bleeding.比较急性下消化道出血不良结局的临床预测工具,并确定其危险因素。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 May;89(5):1005-1013.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.12.011. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
3
Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德评分系统与AIMS65评分系统在急诊科上消化道出血风险分层中的比较
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;22(1):22-30. doi: 10.1111/acem.12554. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
4
Development and Validation of a Risk Scoring System for Severe Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding.严重急性下消化道出血风险评分系统的建立与验证。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Nov;14(11):1562-1570.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.042. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
5
Risk Factors for Adverse Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized With Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding.下消化道出血住院患者不良结局的危险因素
Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Aug;90(8):1021-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.04.024. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
6
Accurate triage of lower gastrointestinal bleed (LGIB) - A cohort study.准确分诊下消化道出血(LGIB)- 一项队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2016 Jan;25:19-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.11.003. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
7
Derivation and Internal Validation of a Clinical Prediction Tool for 30-Day Mortality in Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding.下消化道出血30天死亡率临床预测工具的推导与内部验证
Am J Med. 2017 May;130(5):601.e1-601.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.12.009. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
8
A clinical predictive model for risk stratification of patients with severe acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding.一种用于严重急性下消化道出血患者风险分层的临床预测模型。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Nov 22;16(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00402-y.
9
A multicentre development and validation study of a novel lower gastrointestinal bleeding score-The Birmingham Score.一项新型下消化道出血评分-伯明翰评分的多中心研发和验证研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Feb;35(2):285-293. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03459-z. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
10
External Validation of the Oakland Score to Assess Safe Hospital Discharge Among Adult Patients With Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the US.美国急性下消化道出血成年患者安全出院的 Oakland 评分的外部验证。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e209630. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9630.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of risk scores for predicting adverse outcomes in acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding.预测急性下消化道出血不良结局的风险评分比较
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 9;10(20):e38877. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38877. eCollection 2024 Oct 30.
2
Comparison of Risk Scores for Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding.预测急性下消化道出血不良结局的风险评分比较
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2024 Mar 21;2024:3111414. doi: 10.1155/2024/3111414. eCollection 2024.
3
Comparison of Risk Scores for Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Validation of a Risk Scoring System for Severe Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding.严重急性下消化道出血风险评分系统的建立与验证。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Nov;14(11):1562-1570.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.042. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
2
Accurate triage of lower gastrointestinal bleed (LGIB) - A cohort study.准确分诊下消化道出血(LGIB)- 一项队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2016 Jan;25:19-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.11.003. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
3
Prediction of Outcome in Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding Using Gradient Boosting.
比较下消化道出血风险评分:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2214253. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14253.
使用梯度提升法预测急性下消化道出血的结局
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 14;10(7):e0132485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132485. eCollection 2015.
4
Risk Factors for Adverse Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized With Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding.下消化道出血住院患者不良结局的危险因素
Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Aug;90(8):1021-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.04.024. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
5
A survey of the practice of after-hours and emergency endoscopy in Canada.加拿大非工作时间及急诊内镜检查实践调查。
Can J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec;26(12):871-6. doi: 10.1155/2012/951071.
6
Lower gastrointestinal bleeding: incidence, etiology, and outcomes in a population-based setting.下消化道出血:基于人群的发病率、病因和结局。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Jan;25(1):37-43. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32835948e3.
7
Combining estimates of interest in prognostic modelling studies after multiple imputation: current practice and guidelines.结合多次插补后预后建模研究兴趣的估计:当前实践和指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Jul 28;9:57. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-57.
8
Predictors of utilization of early colonoscopy vs. radiography for severe lower intestinal bleeding.严重下消化道出血时早期结肠镜检查与放射检查使用情况的预测因素
Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Jan;61(1):46-52. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02227-8.
9
Early predictors of severe lower gastrointestinal bleeding and adverse outcomes: a prospective study.严重下消化道出血及不良结局的早期预测因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 Jun;2(6):485-90. doi: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00167-3.
10
Prediction of outcome in acute lower-gastrointestinal haemorrhage based on an artificial neural network: internal and external validation of a predictive model.基于人工神经网络的急性下消化道出血结局预测:预测模型的内部和外部验证
Lancet. 2003 Oct 18;362(9392):1261-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14568-0.