College of Nursing and Midwifery, Holy Family Hospital, RMU, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Faculty of Nursing, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada; Shifa College of Nursing, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 May;88:104389. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104389. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
The ethical and moral complexities are inherent to nursing practice. Ethical dilemmas of professional nurses and nursing students' ethical concerns with their preceptors are well-documented. No reviews have synthesized students' ethical dilemmas regarding patient care.
This review aimed to develop a comprehensive understanding of nursing students' ethical dilemmas regarding patient care in clinical settings.
An integrative review based on Whittemore and Knafl's methodology.
Literature was searched within PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Science Direct databases and 13 articles including eight qualitative, three quantitative, one mixed methods and one secondary data analysis were reviewed. The articles were published from January 2000-March 2019.
The Mixed Methods Critical Appraisal Tool was used for quality assessment. Two reviewers independently reviewed the articles and the third reviewer validated the extracted and synthesized findings. Literature summary tables were developed for data extraction and thematic synthesis techniques and narratives were used for data synthesis. For synthesis, findings from strongly and moderately rated studies were given more weight and those from the low-quality studies were used to support the synthesized themes.
Three themes emerged: a) applying learned ethical values vs. accepting unethical practices, b) desiring to provide ethical care but lacking autonomous decision making, and c) Silence vs. whistleblowing patient care neglects.
Nursing students feel torn between the conflicts of whether to provide ethical care or accept unethical practices, stay silent about patient care neglect or confront and report it, provide ethical and quality care or adapt to the culture due to lack of autonomous decision making. Such conflicts can be detrimental to students' professional learning and mental health. Therefore, educators and nursing institutions should develop programs to support students and help them develop ethical competence and courage to confront such dilemmas.
伦理和道德的复杂性是护理实践固有的。专业护士的伦理困境和护理学生对其导师的伦理关注已有大量记录。但目前尚无文献综合分析学生在临床护理中面临的伦理困境。
本综述旨在全面了解护理学生在临床环境中关于患者护理的伦理困境。
基于 Whittemore 和 Knafl 方法的综合综述。
在 PubMed、CINAHL、Google Scholar、Scopus 和 Science Direct 数据库中搜索文献,共综述了 13 篇文章,包括 8 篇定性研究、3 篇定量研究、1 篇混合方法研究和 1 篇二次数据分析。这些文章的发表时间为 2000 年 1 月至 2019 年 3 月。
使用混合方法关键评估工具进行质量评估。两名评审员独立评审文章,第三名评审员验证提取和综合的结果。为数据提取和主题综合技术开发了文献总结表,并使用叙述进行数据综合。对于综合分析,给予强评和中评研究的结果更多权重,同时参考低质量研究的结果来支持综合主题。
出现了三个主题:a)应用所学的伦理价值观与接受不道德的实践,b)渴望提供伦理护理但缺乏自主决策,以及 c)沉默与忽视患者护理的举报。
护理学生在提供伦理护理或接受不道德实践、对患者护理忽视保持沉默或直面并举报、提供伦理和高质量护理或因缺乏自主决策而适应文化之间感到左右为难。这种冲突可能对学生的专业学习和心理健康造成不利影响。因此,教育者和护理机构应制定支持学生的计划,帮助他们发展伦理能力和勇气,以应对这些困境。