• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

土耳其高年级护理专业学生自我评估智慧量表的心理测量学特性

Psychometric properties of the self-assessed wisdom scale among Turkish senior nursing students.

作者信息

Kaymak Sema, Basaran-Acil Seher, Duygulu Sergul

机构信息

Faculty of Health Science Nursing Department, Ankara Medipol University, Ankara, Türkiye.

Faculty of Nursing, Nursing Services Administration Department, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):755. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03355-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12912-025-03355-8
PMID:40598154
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12211205/
Abstract

AIM

To adapt the Self-Assessed Wisdom Scale (SAWS) into Turkish and to conduct a validity and reliability study with senior nursing students.

METHODS

This study was methodological research. Translation and back translation methods were used to translate the scale into Turkish. Seven experts' opinions in nursing field were consulted for content validity. The study was conducted with 306 senior nursing students. Data were collected using Student Information Form and SAWS. Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling were used for construct validity. Cronbach's alpha value, test-retest method, and Pearson correlation coefficient were used for reliability analysis.

RESULTS

After ensuring language equivalence, the content validity was performed. The content validity index of the scale was 0.95. The items' content validity index (CVIs) ranged between 0.83 and 0.98. The Turkish version of the SAWS (SAWS-TR) has 37 items, and five factors. The 16th, 39th, and 40th items were removed from the original scale due to their low factor loadings. The results CFA were; χ2/df 2.461, RMSEA 0.069, GFI 0.803, CFI 0.807, TLI 0.801, IFI 0.806, and SRMR 0.098. The total Cronbach's alpha value of the scale was 0.91 and the sub-dimension Cronbach's alpha values ranged between 0.78 and 0.85. Test-retest was performed one week apart and there is a statistically significant difference between the test-retest results of the scale (r = 0.668, p > 0.05). These results show that the SAWS-TR measures the same variable at different times at acceptable level.

CONCLUSIONS

The 37-item SAWS-TR is a valid and reliable tool that can be used to evaluate wisdom among Turkish senior nursing students. Nurse educators can utilize the SAWS-TR instrument to assess the wisdom of nursing students, thereby facilitating the development of their decision-making competencies during clinical practice.

摘要

目的

将自我评估智慧量表(SAWS)改编为土耳其语版本,并对高年级护理专业学生进行效度和信度研究。

方法

本研究为方法学研究。采用翻译和回译方法将量表翻译成土耳其语。咨询了7位护理领域专家的意见以进行内容效度评估。研究对象为306名高年级护理专业学生。使用学生信息表和SAWS收集数据。采用验证性因子分析和结构方程模型进行结构效度分析。使用Cronbach's α系数、重测法和Pearson相关系数进行信度分析。

结果

确保语言等效性后,进行了内容效度评估。量表的内容效度指数为0.95。各条目内容效度指数(CVI)在0.83至0.98之间。土耳其语版SAWS(SAWS-TR)有37个条目和五个因子。由于原始量表中第16、39和40个条目的因子载荷较低,故将其删除。验证性因子分析结果为:χ2/df 2.461,RMSEA 0.069,GFI 0.803,CFI 0.807,TLI 0.801,IFI 0.806,SRMR 0.098。量表的总Cronbach's α系数为0.91,各子维度的Cronbach's α系数在0.78至0.85之间。重测间隔为一周,量表重测结果之间存在统计学显著差异(r = 0.668,p > 0.05)。这些结果表明,SAWS-TR在不同时间对同一变量的测量具有可接受的水平。

结论

37个条目的SAWS-TR是一个有效且可靠的工具,可用于评估土耳其高年级护理专业学生的智慧。护理教育工作者可利用SAWS-TR工具评估护理专业学生的智慧,从而在临床实践中促进其决策能力发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/314b/12211205/4fdb7dd47545/12912_2025_3355_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/314b/12211205/4fdb7dd47545/12912_2025_3355_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/314b/12211205/4fdb7dd47545/12912_2025_3355_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the self-assessed wisdom scale among Turkish senior nursing students.土耳其高年级护理专业学生自我评估智慧量表的心理测量学特性
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):755. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03355-8.
2
Turkish adaptation of the clinical reasoning evaluation simulation tool (CREST-TR): a validity and reliability study.临床推理评估模拟工具(CREST-TR)的土耳其语改编版:一项效度和信度研究。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 2;24(1):819. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03503-0.
3
Turkish validity and reliability study of the simulation self-report cognitive load measurement tool 2.0.模拟自我报告认知负荷测量工具2.0的土耳其语效度和信度研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):919. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07504-0.
4
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Dynamic Evaluation of Motor Speech Skill (DEMSS-TR) Test for Children With Speech Sound Disorders.土耳其语版运动性言语技能动态评估(DEMSS-TR)测试对语音障碍儿童的有效性和可靠性
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70067. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70067.
5
Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Version of the Surgical Recovery Scale.《手术恢复量表土耳其语版的效度与信度研究》
J Perianesth Nurs. 2025 Jun 20. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2025.01.023.
6
Nurses' Work Methods Assessment Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study.护士工作方法评估量表:土耳其语版的效度与信度研究
Nurs Rep. 2025 Jun 17;15(6):220. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15060220.
7
Psychometric Evaluation of the Persian Version of the Professional Socialization Scale for Hospital Nurses: A Methodological Study.医院护士专业社会化量表波斯语版本的心理测量学评估:一项方法学研究
SAGE Open Nurs. 2025 Jun 19;11:23779608251345276. doi: 10.1177/23779608251345276. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
8
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the pros and cons of anorexia nervosa (P-CAN-C) scale: a validation study in patients with anorexia nervosa.神经性厌食症利弊中文版量表(P-CAN-C)的心理测量学特性:一项针对神经性厌食症患者的效度研究
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jun 16;13(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01314-x.
9
Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the autism spectrum knowledge scale.自闭症谱系知识量表土耳其语版本的效度和信度研究
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2025 Jun 25;258:105204. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105204.
10
Turkish Validity and Reliability of Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness in Youth.青少年内感受性觉知多维评估在土耳其的效度与信度
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2025 Jun 10;62(2):164-171. doi: 10.29399/npa.28855. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of game-based interventions on the nursing students' level of knowledge: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.基于游戏的干预措施对护生知识水平的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Nurse Educ Today. 2025 Aug;151:106746. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106746. Epub 2025 Apr 12.
2
A Polish adaptation of the Self-Assessed Wisdom Scale (SAWS) in older adults.老年人自我评估智慧量表(SAWS)的波兰语改编版。
Psychiatr Pol. 2022 Jun 28:1-19. doi: 10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/148203.
3
Validating the Self-assessed Wisdom Scale (SAWS) in an Iranian Sample: Psychometric and Developmental Findings.
验证伊朗样本中的自我评估智慧量表(SAWS):心理测量和发展发现。
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2021 Dec;36(4):407-429. doi: 10.1007/s10823-021-09442-y. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
4
Emotional Control among Nurses against Work Conditions and the Support Received during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic.护士在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间应对工作条件和获得的支持的情绪控制。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 6;18(17):9415. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179415.
5
Curvilinear relationship between emotional labour and work engagement in nurses: A correlational study.护士情绪劳动与工作投入的曲线关系:一项相关性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Nov;30(21-22):3355-3365. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15848. Epub 2021 May 15.
6
Nursing students' ethical dilemmas regarding patient care: An integrative review.护理学生在患者护理方面的伦理困境:综合述评。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 May;88:104389. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104389. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
7
The Relation Between Age and Three-Dimensional Wisdom: Variations by Wisdom Dimensions and Education.年龄与三维智慧的关系:智慧维度和教育的变化。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2018 Oct 10;73(8):1339-1349. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx182.
8
Decision-making in nursing practice: An integrative literature review.护理实践中的决策:综合文献回顾。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Mar;27(5-6):917-928. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14151. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
9
A new scale for assessing wisdom based on common domains and a neurobiological model: The San Diego Wisdom Scale (SD-WISE).一种基于常见领域和神经生物学模型的新的智慧评估量表:圣地亚哥智慧量表(SD-WISE)。
J Psychiatr Res. 2019 Jan;108:40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
10
Wisdom, bias, and balance: Toward a process-sensitive measurement of wisdom-related cognition.智慧、偏见和平衡:走向对与智慧相关认知的敏感过程测量。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Dec;115(6):1093-1126. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000171. Epub 2017 Sep 21.